linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
To: dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn, kjlu@umn.edu
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>,
	"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>,
	Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Guy Mishol <guym@ti.com>,
	Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>,
	Maital Hahn <maitalm@ti.com>,
	"Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
	Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
	linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] wlcore: fix runtime pm imbalance in wlcore_irq_locked
Date: Fri, 22 May 2020 12:49:04 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200522044906.29564-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn> (raw)

When wlcore_fw_status() returns an error code, a pairing
runtime PM usage counter decrement is needed to keep the
counter balanced. It's the same for all error paths after
wlcore_fw_status().

Signed-off-by: Dinghao Liu <dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn>
---
 drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c | 17 +++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
index f140f7d7f553..fd3608223f64 100644
--- a/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/wireless/ti/wlcore/main.c
@@ -548,7 +548,7 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 
 		ret = wlcore_fw_status(wl, wl->fw_status);
 		if (ret < 0)
-			goto out;
+			goto err_ret;
 
 		wlcore_hw_tx_immediate_compl(wl);
 
@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 			ret = -EIO;
 
 			/* restarting the chip. ignore any other interrupt. */
-			goto out;
+			goto err_ret;
 		}
 
 		if (unlikely(intr & WL1271_ACX_SW_INTR_WATCHDOG)) {
@@ -575,7 +575,7 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 			ret = -EIO;
 
 			/* restarting the chip. ignore any other interrupt. */
-			goto out;
+			goto err_ret;
 		}
 
 		if (likely(intr & WL1271_ACX_INTR_DATA)) {
@@ -583,7 +583,7 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 
 			ret = wlcore_rx(wl, wl->fw_status);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				goto out;
+				goto err_ret;
 
 			/* Check if any tx blocks were freed */
 			spin_lock_irqsave(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
@@ -596,7 +596,7 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 				 */
 				ret = wlcore_tx_work_locked(wl);
 				if (ret < 0)
-					goto out;
+					goto err_ret;
 			} else {
 				spin_unlock_irqrestore(&wl->wl_lock, flags);
 			}
@@ -604,7 +604,7 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 			/* check for tx results */
 			ret = wlcore_hw_tx_delayed_compl(wl);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				goto out;
+				goto err_ret;
 
 			/* Make sure the deferred queues don't get too long */
 			defer_count = skb_queue_len(&wl->deferred_tx_queue) +
@@ -617,14 +617,14 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 			wl1271_debug(DEBUG_IRQ, "WL1271_ACX_INTR_EVENT_A");
 			ret = wl1271_event_handle(wl, 0);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				goto out;
+				goto err_ret;
 		}
 
 		if (intr & WL1271_ACX_INTR_EVENT_B) {
 			wl1271_debug(DEBUG_IRQ, "WL1271_ACX_INTR_EVENT_B");
 			ret = wl1271_event_handle(wl, 1);
 			if (ret < 0)
-				goto out;
+				goto err_ret;
 		}
 
 		if (intr & WL1271_ACX_INTR_INIT_COMPLETE)
@@ -635,6 +635,7 @@ static int wlcore_irq_locked(struct wl1271 *wl)
 			wl1271_debug(DEBUG_IRQ, "WL1271_ACX_INTR_HW_AVAILABLE");
 	}
 
+err_ret:
 	pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(wl->dev);
 	pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(wl->dev);
 
-- 
2.17.1


             reply	other threads:[~2020-05-22  4:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-22  4:49 Dinghao Liu [this message]
2020-05-22 17:57 ` [PATCH] wlcore: fix runtime pm imbalance in wlcore_irq_locked Tony Lindgren
2020-05-29 17:38 ` Kalle Valo

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200522044906.29564-1-dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn \
    --to=dinghao.liu@zju.edu.cn \
    --cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com \
    --cc=guym@ti.com \
    --cc=johannes.berg@intel.com \
    --cc=kjlu@umn.edu \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvalo@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maitalm@ti.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony@atomide.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).