linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
To: bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com,
	linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: kernel-list@raspberrypi.com, laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org,
	Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>,
	devel@driverdev.osuosl.org
Subject: [RFC 12/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchi_msg_peek()
Date: Wed, 27 May 2020 13:53:17 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200527115400.31391-13-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200527115400.31391-1-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>

There already is a function that covers most of the functionality
vchi_msg_peek() provides: vchi_msg_hold(). The main difference being
that the later removes the message from vchu's queue while the other
does it later on, while releasing the message.

There are no users of this function that can't be trivially converted to
vchi_msg_hold(). So, for the sake of removing duplicate code, get rid of
vchi_msg_peek().

Note that the opposite change could be performed as well. But
vchi_msg_peek()'s implementation was deemed less robust as messages have
to be released in order.

Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@suse.de>
---
 .../vc04_services/interface/vchi/vchi.h       | 12 ----
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_shim.c          | 64 -------------------
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.c          | 12 ----
 .../interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.h          |  1 -
 .../vc04_services/vc-sm-cma/vc_sm_cma_vchi.c  |  7 +-
 5 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 92 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/vchi.h b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/vchi.h
index 1a981e98e82b..1daef5ad70f1 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/vchi.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchi/vchi.h
@@ -103,18 +103,6 @@ extern int32_t vchi_msg_dequeue(struct vchi_service_handle *handle,
 				uint32_t *actual_msg_size,
 				enum vchi_flags flags);
 
-// Routine to look at a message in place.
-// The message is not dequeued, so a subsequent call to peek or dequeue
-// will return the same message.
-extern int32_t vchi_msg_peek(struct vchi_service_handle *handle,
-			     void **data,
-			     uint32_t *msg_size,
-			     enum vchi_flags flags);
-
-// Routine to remove a message after it has been read in place with peek
-// The first message on the queue is dequeued.
-extern int32_t vchi_msg_remove(struct vchi_service_handle *handle);
-
 // Routine to look at a message in place.
 // The message is dequeued, so the caller is left holding it; the descriptor is
 // filled in and must be released when the user has finished with the message.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_shim.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_shim.c
index 75d87b6992c4..54c2492b7c83 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_shim.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_shim.c
@@ -18,70 +18,6 @@ struct shim_service {
 	void *callback_param;
 };
 
-/***********************************************************
- * Name: vchi_msg_peek
- *
- * Arguments:  struct vchi_service_handle *handle,
- *             void **data,
- *             uint32_t *msg_size,
-
- *             enum vchi_flags flags
- *
- * Description: Routine to return a pointer to the current message (to allow in
- *              place processing). The message can be removed using
- *              vchi_msg_remove when you're finished
- *
- * Returns: int32_t - success == 0
- *
- ***********************************************************/
-int32_t vchi_msg_peek(struct vchi_service_handle *handle,
-		      void **data,
-		      uint32_t *msg_size,
-		      enum vchi_flags flags)
-{
-	struct shim_service *service = (struct shim_service *)handle;
-	struct vchiq_header *header;
-
-	WARN_ON((flags != VCHI_FLAGS_NONE) &&
-		(flags != VCHI_FLAGS_BLOCK_UNTIL_OP_COMPLETE));
-
-	if (flags == VCHI_FLAGS_NONE)
-		if (vchiu_queue_is_empty(&service->queue))
-			return -1;
-
-	header = vchiu_queue_peek(&service->queue);
-
-	*data = header->data;
-	*msg_size = header->size;
-
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(vchi_msg_peek);
-
-/***********************************************************
- * Name: vchi_msg_remove
- *
- * Arguments:  struct vchi_service_handle *handle,
- *
- * Description: Routine to remove a message (after it has been read with
- *              vchi_msg_peek)
- *
- * Returns: int32_t - success == 0
- *
- ***********************************************************/
-int32_t vchi_msg_remove(struct vchi_service_handle *handle)
-{
-	struct shim_service *service = (struct shim_service *)handle;
-	struct vchiq_header *header;
-
-	header = vchiu_queue_pop(&service->queue);
-
-	vchiq_release_message(service->handle, header);
-
-	return 0;
-}
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(vchi_msg_remove);
-
 int vchi_queue_kernel_message(struct vchi_service_handle *handle, void *data,
 			       unsigned int size)
 {
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.c
index 644844d88fed..c1c81f9ab9e6 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.c
@@ -55,18 +55,6 @@ void vchiu_queue_push(struct vchiu_queue *queue, struct vchiq_header *header)
 	complete(&queue->push);
 }
 
-struct vchiq_header *vchiu_queue_peek(struct vchiu_queue *queue)
-{
-	while (queue->write == queue->read) {
-		if (wait_for_completion_interruptible(&queue->push))
-			flush_signals(current);
-	}
-
-	complete(&queue->push); // We haven't removed anything from the queue.
-
-	return queue->storage[queue->read & (queue->size - 1)];
-}
-
 struct vchiq_header *vchiu_queue_pop(struct vchiu_queue *queue)
 {
 	struct vchiq_header *header;
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.h b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.h
index f03a4250de0d..1c90a8da1a92 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/interface/vchiq_arm/vchiq_util.h
@@ -44,7 +44,6 @@ extern int vchiu_queue_is_empty(struct vchiu_queue *queue);
 extern void vchiu_queue_push(struct vchiu_queue *queue,
 			     struct vchiq_header *header);
 
-extern struct vchiq_header *vchiu_queue_peek(struct vchiu_queue *queue);
 extern struct vchiq_header *vchiu_queue_pop(struct vchiu_queue *queue);
 
 #endif
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vc-sm-cma/vc_sm_cma_vchi.c b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vc-sm-cma/vc_sm_cma_vchi.c
index 6a203c60bf7f..cd3f62844616 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vc-sm-cma/vc_sm_cma_vchi.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/vc04_services/vc-sm-cma/vc_sm_cma_vchi.c
@@ -180,6 +180,7 @@ static int vc_sm_cma_vchi_videocore_io(void *arg)
 	struct sm_instance *instance = arg;
 	struct sm_cmd_rsp_blk *cmd = NULL, *cmd_tmp;
 	struct vc_sm_result_t *reply;
+	struct vchi_held_msg msg;
 	u32 reply_len;
 	s32 status;
 	int svc_use = 1;
@@ -236,8 +237,8 @@ static int vc_sm_cma_vchi_videocore_io(void *arg)
 
 		} while (1);
 
-		while (!vchi_msg_peek(instance->vchi_handle[0], (void **)&reply,
-				      &reply_len, VCHI_FLAGS_NONE)) {
+		while (!vchi_msg_hold(instance->vchi_handle[0], (void **)&reply,
+				       &reply_len, VCHI_FLAGS_NONE, &msg)) {
 			if (reply->trans_id & 0x80000000) {
 				/* Async event or cmd from the VPU */
 				if (instance->vpu_event)
@@ -248,7 +249,7 @@ static int vc_sm_cma_vchi_videocore_io(void *arg)
 						      reply_len);
 			}
 
-			vchi_msg_remove(instance->vchi_handle[0]);
+			vchi_held_msg_release(&msg);
 		}
 
 		/* Go through the dead list and free them */
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-05-27 11:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-05-27 11:53 [RFC 00/50] staging: vchiq: Getting rid of the vchi/vchiq split Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 01/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchi_service_destroy() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 02/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchi_queue_user_message() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 03/50] staging: vchiq: Move copy callback handling into vchiq Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 04/50] staging: vchi: Merge vchi_msg_queue() into vchi_queue_kernel_message() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 05/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchi_service_set_option() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 06/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchiq_status_to_vchi() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 07/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of not implemented function declarations Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 08/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of C++ guards Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 09/50] staging: vchiq: move vchiq_release_message() into vchiq Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 10/50] staging: vchiq: Get rid of VCHIQ_SERVICE_OPENEND callback reason Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 11/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of all useless callback reasons Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` Nicolas Saenz Julienne [this message]
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 13/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of struct vchi_instance_handle Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 14/50] staging: vchi: Unify struct shim_service and struct vchi_service_handle Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 15/50] staging: vc04_services: bcm2835-audio: Use vchi_msg_hold() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 16/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchi_msg_dequeue() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 17/50] staging: vchi_common: Get rid of all unused definitions Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 18/50] staging: vc04_services: vc-sm-cma: Get rid of the multiple connections option Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 19/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of unnecessary defines Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 20/50] staging: vc04_services: Get rid of vchi_cfg.h Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 21/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of flags argument in vchi_msg_hold() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 22/50] staging: vchi: Use enum vchiq_bulk_mode instead of vchi's transmission flags Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 23/50] staging: vchi: Use vchiq's enum vchiq_reason Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 24/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of effect less expression Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 25/50] staging: vchiq: Introduce vchiq_validate_params() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 26/50] staging: vchiq: Move message queue into struct vchiq_service Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 27/50] staging: vchiq: Get rid of vchiq_util.h Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 28/50] staging: vchi: Expose struct vchi_service Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 29/50] staging: vchiq: Export vchiq_get_service_userdata() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 30/50] staging: vchiq: Export vchiq_msg_queue_push Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 31/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchiq_shim's message callback Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 32/50] staging: vchiq: Don't use a typedef for vchiq_callback Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 33/50] staging: vchi: Use struct vchiq_service_params Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 34/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of struct vchi_service Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 35/50] staging: vchiq: Pass vchiq's message when holding a message Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 36/50] staging: vchi: Rework vchi_msg_hold() to match vchiq_msg_hold() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 37/50] staging: vchiq: Unify fourcc definition mechanisms Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 38/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of struct vchiq_instance forward declaration Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 39/50] staging: vchi: Don't include vchiq_core.h Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 40/50] staging: vchiq: Get rid of unnecessary definitions in vchiq_if.h Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 41/50] staging: vchiq: Make vchiq_add_service() local Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 42/50] staging: vchiq: Move definitions only used by core into core header Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 43/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchi_bulk_queue_receive() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 44/50] staging: vchi: Get rid of vchi_bulk_queue_transmit() Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 45/50] staging: vchi: Move vchi_queue_kernel_message() into vchiq Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 46/50] staging: vchiq: Get rid of vchi Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 47/50] staging: vchiq: Move conditional barrier definition into vchiq_core.h Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 48/50] staging: vchiq: Use vchiq.h as the main header file for services Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 49/50] staging: vchiq: Move defines into core header Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 11:53 ` [RFC 50/50] staging: vchiq: Move vchiq.h into include directory Nicolas Saenz Julienne
2020-05-27 12:08 ` [RFC 00/50] staging: vchiq: Getting rid of the vchi/vchiq split Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200527115400.31391-13-nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --to=nsaenzjulienne@suse.de \
    --cc=bcm-kernel-feedback-list@broadcom.com \
    --cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-list@raspberrypi.com \
    --cc=laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-rpi-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).