From: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Joel Fernandes (Google)" <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@google.com>,
Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
rcu@vger.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH 5/7] rcu/trace: Use rsp's gp_seq in acceleration's rcu_grace_period tracepoint
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2020 16:29:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200618202955.4024-5-joel@joelfernandes.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200618202955.4024-1-joel@joelfernandes.org>
During acceleration of CB, the rsp's gp_seq is rcu_seq_snap'd. This is
the value used for acceleration - it is the value of gp_seq at which it
is safe the execute all callbacks in the callback list.
The rdp's gp_seq is not very useful for this scenario. Make
rcu_grace_period report the rsp's gp_seq instead as it allows one to
reason about how the acceleration works.
Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes (Google) <joel@joelfernandes.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tree.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 81df1b837dd9d..c3bae7a83d792 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -1437,9 +1437,9 @@ static bool rcu_accelerate_cbs(struct rcu_node *rnp, struct rcu_data *rdp)
/* Trace depending on how much we were able to accelerate. */
if (rcu_segcblist_restempty(&rdp->cblist, RCU_WAIT_TAIL))
- trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, "rdp", rdp->gp_seq, TPS("AccWaitCB"));
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, "rsp", rcu_state.gp_seq, TPS("AccWaitCB"));
else
- trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, "rdp", rdp->gp_seq, TPS("AccReadyCB"));
+ trace_rcu_grace_period(rcu_state.name, "rsp", rcu_state.gp_seq, TPS("AccReadyCB"));
/* Count CBs for tracing. */
rcu_segcblist_countseq(&rdp->cblist, cbs, gps);
--
2.27.0.111.gc72c7da667-goog
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-06-18 20:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-06-18 20:29 [PATCH 1/7] rcu/segcblist: Prevent useless GP start if no CBs to accelerate Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-06-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 2/7] rcu/trace: Add tracing for how segcb list changes Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-06-18 22:16 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 23:52 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 3/7] rcu/trace: Add name of the source for gp_seq Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-06-18 22:19 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 23:51 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-19 0:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 0:56 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-19 1:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-19 0:01 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-06-19 1:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 4/7] rcu/trace: Print negative GP numbers correctly Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-06-18 22:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 20:29 ` Joel Fernandes (Google) [this message]
2020-06-18 22:27 ` [PATCH 5/7] rcu/trace: Use rsp's gp_seq in acceleration's rcu_grace_period tracepoint Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 23:54 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 6/7] rcutorture: Add support to get the number of wakeups of main GP kthread Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-06-18 22:40 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 0:01 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-19 0:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 1:00 ` Joel Fernandes
2020-06-19 3:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 20:29 ` [PATCH 7/7] rcutorture: Add number of GP information to reports Joel Fernandes (Google)
2020-06-18 23:27 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 22:11 ` [PATCH 1/7] rcu/segcblist: Prevent useless GP start if no CBs to accelerate Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-18 23:09 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-06-19 0:04 ` Joel Fernandes
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200618202955.4024-5-joel@joelfernandes.org \
--to=joel@joelfernandes.org \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
--cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).