linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	kernel-team@android.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 3/3] driver core: Avoid deferred probe due to fw_devlink_pause/resume()
Date: Wed,  1 Jul 2020 12:42:59 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200701194259.3337652-4-saravanak@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200701194259.3337652-1-saravanak@google.com>

With the earlier patch in this series, all devices that deferred probe
due to fw_devlink_pause() will have their probes delayed till the
deferred probe thread is kicked off during late_initcall. This will also
affect all their consumers.

This delayed probing in unnecessary. So this patch just keeps track of
the devices that had their probe deferred due to fw_devlink_pause() and
attempts to probe them once during fw_devlink_resume().

Fixes: 716a7a259690 ("driver core: fw_devlink: Add support for batching fwnode parsing")
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
---
 drivers/base/core.c    | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
 include/linux/device.h |  3 ++-
 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/core.c b/drivers/base/core.c
index d1d2cdc3a8d8..05d414e9e8a4 100644
--- a/drivers/base/core.c
+++ b/drivers/base/core.c
@@ -50,6 +50,7 @@ static DEFINE_MUTEX(wfs_lock);
 static LIST_HEAD(deferred_sync);
 static unsigned int defer_sync_state_count = 1;
 static unsigned int defer_fw_devlink_count;
+static LIST_HEAD(deferred_fw_devlink);
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(defer_fw_devlink_lock);
 static bool fw_devlink_is_permissive(void);
 
@@ -1244,6 +1245,12 @@ static void fw_devlink_link_device(struct device *dev)
 			fw_ret = -EAGAIN;
 	} else {
 		fw_ret = -ENODEV;
+		/*
+		 * defer_hook is not used to add device to deferred_sync list
+		 * until device is bound. Since deferred fw devlink also blocks
+		 * probing, same list hook can be used for deferred_fw_devlink.
+		 */
+		list_add_tail(&dev->links.defer_hook, &deferred_fw_devlink);
 	}
 
 	if (fw_ret == -ENODEV)
@@ -1312,6 +1319,9 @@ void fw_devlink_pause(void)
  */
 void fw_devlink_resume(void)
 {
+	struct device *dev, *tmp;
+	LIST_HEAD(probe_list);
+
 	mutex_lock(&defer_fw_devlink_lock);
 	if (!defer_fw_devlink_count) {
 		WARN(true, "Unmatched fw_devlink pause/resume!");
@@ -1323,8 +1333,19 @@ void fw_devlink_resume(void)
 		goto out;
 
 	device_link_add_missing_supplier_links();
+	list_splice_tail_init(&deferred_fw_devlink, &probe_list);
 out:
 	mutex_unlock(&defer_fw_devlink_lock);
+
+	/*
+	 * bus_probe_device() can cause new devices to get added and they'll
+	 * try to grab defer_fw_devlink_lock. So, this needs to be done outside
+	 * the defer_fw_devlink_lock.
+	 */
+	list_for_each_entry_safe(dev, tmp, &probe_list, links.defer_hook) {
+		list_del_init(&dev->links.defer_hook);
+		bus_probe_device(dev);
+	}
 }
 /* Device links support end. */
 
diff --git a/include/linux/device.h b/include/linux/device.h
index 9bb2bc7bb8e3..5efed864b387 100644
--- a/include/linux/device.h
+++ b/include/linux/device.h
@@ -433,7 +433,8 @@ enum dl_dev_state {
  * @suppliers: List of links to supplier devices.
  * @consumers: List of links to consumer devices.
  * @needs_suppliers: Hook to global list of devices waiting for suppliers.
- * @defer_hook: Hook to global list of devices that have deferred sync_state.
+ * @defer_hook: Hook to global list of devices that have deferred sync_state or
+ *		deferred fw_devlink.
  * @need_for_probe: If needs_suppliers is on a list, this indicates if the
  *		    suppliers are needed for probe or not.
  * @status: Driver status information.
-- 
2.27.0.212.ge8ba1cc988-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-07-01 19:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-07-01 19:42 [PATCH v1 0/3] Fix dpm_list ordering issue due to fw_devlink optimization Saravana Kannan
2020-07-01 19:42 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] driver core: Don't do deferred probe in parallel with kernel_init thread Saravana Kannan
2020-07-07 15:59   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-07 21:54     ` Saravana Kannan
2020-07-01 19:42 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] driver core: Rename dev_links_info.defer_sync to defer_hook Saravana Kannan
2020-07-07 16:02   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-01 19:42 ` Saravana Kannan [this message]
2020-07-07 15:56 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] Fix dpm_list ordering issue due to fw_devlink optimization Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-07-08  8:16   ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2020-07-08 17:36     ` Saravana Kannan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200701194259.3337652-4-saravanak@google.com \
    --to=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rafael@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).