linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>,
	Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>,
	Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
	Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask
Date: Fri,  7 Aug 2020 13:15:16 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200807074517.27957-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)

cpu_smt_mask tracks topology_sibling_cpumask. This would be good for
most architectures. One of the users of cpu_smt_mask(), would be to
identify idle-cores. On Power9, a pair of SMT4 cores can be presented by
the firmware as a SMT8 core for backward compatibility reasons.

Powerpc allows LPARs to be live migrated from Power8 to Power9. Do note
Power8 had only SMT8 cores. Existing software which has been
developed/configured for Power8 would expect to see SMT8 core.
Maintaining the illusion of SMT8 core is a requirement to make that
work.

In order to maintain above userspace backward compatibility with
previous versions of processor, Power9 onwards there is option to the
firmware to advertise a pair of SMT4 cores as a fused cores aka SMT8
core. On Power9 this pair shares the L2 cache as well. However, from the
scheduler's point of view, a core should be determined by SMT4, since
its a completely independent unit of compute. Hence allow PowerPc
architecture to override the default cpu_smt_mask() to point to the SMT4
cores in a SMT8 mode.

This will ensure the scheduler is always given the right information.

Cc: linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Michael Neuling <mikey@neuling.org>
Cc: Gautham R Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Cc: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
Cc: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Cc: Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by; Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
Changelog v1->v2:
	Update the commit msg based on the discussion in community esp
	with Peter Zijlstra and Michael Ellerman.

 include/linux/topology.h | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/topology.h b/include/linux/topology.h
index 608fa4aadf0e..ad03df1cc266 100644
--- a/include/linux/topology.h
+++ b/include/linux/topology.h
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@ static inline int cpu_to_mem(int cpu)
 #define topology_die_cpumask(cpu)		cpumask_of(cpu)
 #endif
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_SCHED_SMT
+#if defined(CONFIG_SCHED_SMT) && !defined(cpu_smt_mask)
 static inline const struct cpumask *cpu_smt_mask(int cpu)
 {
 	return topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu);
-- 
2.18.2


             reply	other threads:[~2020-08-07  7:45 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-07  7:45 Srikar Dronamraju [this message]
2020-08-07  7:45 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] powerpc/topology: Override cpu_smt_mask Srikar Dronamraju
2020-09-17 11:27 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] sched/topology: Allow archs to override cpu_smt_mask Michael Ellerman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200807074517.27957-1-srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
    --cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
    --cc=mikey@neuling.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=svaidy@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
    --cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).