linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michał Mirosław" <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@gmail.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
	Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@mleia.com>
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] regulator: remove superfluous lock in regulator_resolve_coupling()
Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2020 03:07:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <169f98e7a2064a184167abc0f206f3a92513b8d8.1597107682.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1597107682.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>

The code modifies rdev, but locks c_rdev instead. The bug remains:
stored c_rdev could be freed just after unlock anyway. This doesn't blow
up because regulator_list_mutex taken outside holds it together.

Signed-off-by: Michał Mirosław <mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl>
---
 drivers/regulator/core.c | 4 ----
 1 file changed, 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index b85ec974944e..f8834559a2fb 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -4942,13 +4942,9 @@ static void regulator_resolve_coupling(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
 			return;
 		}
 
-		regulator_lock(c_rdev);
-
 		c_desc->coupled_rdevs[i] = c_rdev;
 		c_desc->n_resolved++;
 
-		regulator_unlock(c_rdev);
-
 		regulator_resolve_coupling(c_rdev);
 	}
 }
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-08-11  1:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-11  1:07 [PATCH 0/7] regulator: fix deadlock vs memory reclaim Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11  1:07 ` [PATCH 1/7] regulator: push allocation in regulator_init_coupling() outside of lock Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11 15:59   ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-08-11 16:27     ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-08-11 17:20       ` Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11 21:02         ` Dmitry Osipenko
2020-08-11  1:07 ` [PATCH 3/7] regulator: push allocations in create_regulator() " Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11  1:07 ` [PATCH 2/7] regulator: push allocation in regulator_ena_gpio_request() out " Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11  1:07 ` [PATCH 4/7] regulator: push allocation in set_consumer_device_supply() " Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11  5:23   ` kernel test robot
2020-08-11 17:28     ` Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11  1:07 ` [PATCH 6/7] regulator: cleanup regulator_ena_gpio_free() Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11  1:07 ` [PATCH 5/7] regulator: plug of_node leak in regulator_register()'s error path Michał Mirosław
2020-08-11  6:15   ` Vladimir Zapolskiy
2020-08-11  1:07 ` Michał Mirosław [this message]
2020-08-11 15:56   ` [PATCH 7/7] regulator: remove superfluous lock in regulator_resolve_coupling() Dmitry Osipenko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=169f98e7a2064a184167abc0f206f3a92513b8d8.1597107682.git.mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    --to=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=digetx@gmail.com \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=vz@mleia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).