linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>, Joerg Roedel <joro@8bytes.org>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>, Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 1/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Move flush logic from mmu_page_zap_pte() to FNAME(invlpg)
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 12:27:57 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200812192758.25587-2-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200812192758.25587-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>

Move the logic that controls whether or not FNAME(invlpg) needs to flush
fully into FNAME(invlpg) so that mmu_page_zap_pte() doesn't return a
value.  This allows a future patch to redefine the return semantics for
mmu_page_zap_pte() so that it can recursively zap orphaned child shadow
pages for nested TDP MMUs.

No functional change intended.

Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c         | 10 +++-------
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h |  7 +++++--
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 4e03841f053de..38180befce321 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -2614,7 +2614,7 @@ static void validate_direct_spte(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 *sptep,
 	}
 }
 
-static bool mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
+static void mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 			     u64 *spte)
 {
 	u64 pte;
@@ -2630,13 +2630,9 @@ static bool mmu_page_zap_pte(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *sp,
 			child = to_shadow_page(pte & PT64_BASE_ADDR_MASK);
 			drop_parent_pte(child, spte);
 		}
-		return true;
-	}
-
-	if (is_mmio_spte(pte))
+	} else if (is_mmio_spte(pte)) {
 		mmu_spte_clear_no_track(spte);
-
-	return false;
+	}
 }
 
 static void kvm_mmu_page_unlink_children(struct kvm *kvm,
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
index 4dd6b1e5b8cf7..3bb624a3dda92 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/paging_tmpl.h
@@ -895,6 +895,7 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, hpa_t root_hpa)
 {
 	struct kvm_shadow_walk_iterator iterator;
 	struct kvm_mmu_page *sp;
+	u64 old_spte;
 	int level;
 	u64 *sptep;
 
@@ -917,7 +918,8 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, hpa_t root_hpa)
 		sptep = iterator.sptep;
 
 		sp = sptep_to_sp(sptep);
-		if (is_last_spte(*sptep, level)) {
+		old_spte = *sptep;
+		if (is_last_spte(old_spte, level)) {
 			pt_element_t gpte;
 			gpa_t pte_gpa;
 
@@ -927,7 +929,8 @@ static void FNAME(invlpg)(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, gva_t gva, hpa_t root_hpa)
 			pte_gpa = FNAME(get_level1_sp_gpa)(sp);
 			pte_gpa += (sptep - sp->spt) * sizeof(pt_element_t);
 
-			if (mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, sp, sptep))
+			mmu_page_zap_pte(vcpu->kvm, sp, sptep);
+			if (is_shadow_present_pte(old_spte))
 				kvm_flush_remote_tlbs_with_address(vcpu->kvm,
 					sp->gfn, KVM_PAGES_PER_HPAGE(sp->role.level));
 
-- 
2.28.0


  reply	other threads:[~2020-08-12 19:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-08-12 19:27 [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap orphaned kids for nested TDP MMU Sean Christopherson
2020-08-12 19:27 ` Sean Christopherson [this message]
2020-08-12 19:27 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] KVM: x86/MMU: Recursively zap nested TDP SPs when zapping last/only parent Sean Christopherson
2020-08-12 21:15 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] KVM: x86/mmu: Zap orphaned kids for nested TDP MMU Ben Gardon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200812192758.25587-2-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --to=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=joro@8bytes.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).