From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users <linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Carsten Emde <C.Emde@osadl.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
John Kacur <jkacur@redhat.com>, Daniel Wagner <wagi@monom.org>,
Tom Zanussi <zanussi@kernel.org>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa@csail.mit.edu>,
stable-rt@vger.kernel.org,
"Luis Claudio R. Goncalves" <lclaudio@uudg.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Subject: [PATCH RT 3/6] Bluetooth: Acquire sk_lock.slock without disabling interrupts
Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2020 21:45:37 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200813014555.694818878@goodmis.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20200813014534.833107526@goodmis.org
5.4.54-rt33-rc1 stable review patch.
If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
[ Upstream commit e6da0edc24eecef2f6964d92fa9044e1821deace ]
There was a lockdep which led to commit
fad003b6c8e3d ("Bluetooth: Fix inconsistent lock state with RFCOMM")
Lockdep noticed that `sk->sk_lock.slock' was acquired without disabling
the softirq while the lock was also used in softirq context.
Unfortunately the solution back then was to disable interrupts before
acquiring the lock which however made lockdep happy.
It would have been enough to simply disable the softirq. Disabling
interrupts before acquiring a spinlock_t is not allowed on PREEMPT_RT
because these locks are converted to 'sleeping' spinlocks.
Use spin_lock_bh() in order to acquire the `sk_lock.slock'.
Cc: stable-rt@vger.kernel.org
Reported-by: Luis Claudio R. Goncalves <lclaudio@uudg.org>
Reported-by: kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> [missing unlock]
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
---
net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c | 7 ++-----
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
index 90bb53aa4bee..2c27aa2acf1c 100644
--- a/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
+++ b/net/bluetooth/rfcomm/sock.c
@@ -64,15 +64,13 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_data_ready(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, struct sk_buff *skb)
static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
{
struct sock *sk = d->owner, *parent;
- unsigned long flags;
if (!sk)
return;
BT_DBG("dlc %p state %ld err %d", d, d->state, err);
- local_irq_save(flags);
- bh_lock_sock(sk);
+ spin_lock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
if (err)
sk->sk_err = err;
@@ -93,8 +91,7 @@ static void rfcomm_sk_state_change(struct rfcomm_dlc *d, int err)
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
}
- bh_unlock_sock(sk);
- local_irq_restore(flags);
+ spin_unlock_bh(&sk->sk_lock.slock);
if (parent && sock_flag(sk, SOCK_ZAPPED)) {
/* We have to drop DLC lock here, otherwise
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-13 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-13 1:45 [PATCH RT 0/6] Linux 5.4.54-rt33-rc1 Steven Rostedt
2020-08-13 1:45 ` [PATCH RT 1/6] signal: Prevent double-free of user struct Steven Rostedt
2020-08-13 8:25 ` Rasmus Villemoes
2020-08-13 19:28 ` Steven Rostedt
2020-08-13 1:45 ` [PATCH RT 2/6] workqueue: Sync with upstream Steven Rostedt
2020-08-13 1:45 ` Steven Rostedt [this message]
2020-08-13 1:45 ` [PATCH RT 4/6] net: phy: fixed_phy: Remove unused seqcount Steven Rostedt
2020-08-13 1:45 ` [PATCH RT 5/6] rwsem: Provide down_read_non_owner() and up_read_non_owner() for -RT Steven Rostedt
2020-08-13 1:45 ` [PATCH RT 6/6] Linux 5.4.54-rt33-rc1 Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200813014555.694818878@goodmis.org \
--to=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=C.Emde@osadl.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=jkacur@redhat.com \
--cc=lclaudio@uudg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marcel@holtmann.org \
--cc=srivatsa@csail.mit.edu \
--cc=stable-rt@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=wagi@monom.org \
--cc=zanussi@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).