linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Zhiqiang Hou <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
To: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, robh+dt@kernel.org,
	lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com, bhelgaas@google.com,
	shawnguo@kernel.org, kishon@ti.com, leoyang.li@nxp.com,
	gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com, arnd@arndb.de,
	gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, andrew.murray@arm.com
Cc: minghuan.Lian@nxp.com, mingkai.hu@nxp.com, roy.zang@nxp.com,
	Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>,
	Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Subject: [PATCHv8 07/12] PCI: layerscape: Modify the way of getting capability with different PEX
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2020 16:00:19 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200918080024.13639-8-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200918080024.13639-1-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>

From: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>

The different PCIe controller in one board may be have different
capability of MSI or MSIX, so change the way of getting the MSI
capability, make it more flexible.

Signed-off-by: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@nxp.com>
Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
---
V8:
 - No change.

 .../pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c    | 31 ++++++++++++++-----
 1 file changed, 23 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
index 0691d9ad1356..9601f9c09cb1 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pci-layerscape-ep.c
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@
 
 struct ls_pcie_ep {
 	struct dw_pcie		*pci;
+	struct pci_epc_features	*ls_epc;
 };
 
 #define to_ls_pcie_ep(x)	dev_get_drvdata((x)->dev)
@@ -40,26 +41,31 @@ static const struct of_device_id ls_pcie_ep_of_match[] = {
 	{ },
 };
 
-static const struct pci_epc_features ls_pcie_epc_features = {
-	.linkup_notifier = false,
-	.msi_capable = true,
-	.msix_capable = false,
-	.bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
-};
-
 static const struct pci_epc_features*
 ls_pcie_ep_get_features(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 {
-	return &ls_pcie_epc_features;
+	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
+
+	return pcie->ls_epc;
 }
 
 static void ls_pcie_ep_init(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep)
 {
 	struct dw_pcie *pci = to_dw_pcie_from_ep(ep);
+	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie = to_ls_pcie_ep(pci);
+	struct dw_pcie_ep_func *ep_func;
 	enum pci_barno bar;
 
+	ep_func = dw_pcie_ep_get_func_from_ep(ep, 0);
+	if (!ep_func)
+		return;
+
 	for (bar = 0; bar < PCI_STD_NUM_BARS; bar++)
 		dw_pcie_ep_reset_bar(pci, bar);
+
+	pcie->ls_epc->msi_capable = ep_func->msi_cap ? true : false;
+	pcie->ls_epc->msix_capable = ep_func->msix_cap ? true : false;
 }
 
 static int ls_pcie_ep_raise_irq(struct dw_pcie_ep *ep, u8 func_no,
@@ -119,6 +125,7 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
 	struct dw_pcie *pci;
 	struct ls_pcie_ep *pcie;
+	struct pci_epc_features *ls_epc;
 	struct resource *dbi_base;
 	int ret;
 
@@ -130,6 +137,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	if (!pci)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	ls_epc = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*ls_epc), GFP_KERNEL);
+	if (!ls_epc)
+		return -ENOMEM;
+
 	dbi_base = platform_get_resource_byname(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, "regs");
 	pci->dbi_base = devm_pci_remap_cfg_resource(dev, dbi_base);
 	if (IS_ERR(pci->dbi_base))
@@ -140,6 +151,10 @@ static int __init ls_pcie_ep_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	pci->ops = &ls_pcie_ep_ops;
 	pcie->pci = pci;
 
+	ls_epc->bar_fixed_64bit = (1 << BAR_2) | (1 << BAR_4),
+
+	pcie->ls_epc = ls_epc;
+
 	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, pcie);
 
 	ret = ls_add_pcie_ep(pcie, pdev);
-- 
2.17.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-09-18  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-09-18  8:00 [PATCHv8 00/12]PCI: dwc: Add the multiple PF support for DWC and Layerscape Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 01/12] PCI: designware-ep: Add multiple PFs support for DWC Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 02/12] PCI: designware-ep: Add the doorbell mode of MSI-X in EP mode Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 03/12] PCI: designware-ep: Move the function of getting MSI capability forward Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 04/12] PCI: designware-ep: Modify MSI and MSIX CAP way of finding Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 05/12] dt-bindings: pci: layerscape-pci: Add compatible strings for ls1088a and ls2088a Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 06/12] PCI: layerscape: Fix some format issue of the code Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` Zhiqiang Hou [this message]
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 08/12] PCI: layerscape: Modify the MSIX to the doorbell mode Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 09/12] PCI: layerscape: Add EP mode support for ls1088a and ls2088a Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 10/12] arm64: dts: layerscape: Add PCIe EP node for ls1088a Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-24 13:07   ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 11/12] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add LS1088a in pci_device_id table Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-18  8:00 ` [PATCHv8 12/12] misc: pci_endpoint_test: Add driver data for Layerscape PCIe controllers Zhiqiang Hou
2020-09-21 11:03 ` [PATCHv8 00/12]PCI: dwc: Add the multiple PF support for DWC and Layerscape Lorenzo Pieralisi

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200918080024.13639-8-Zhiqiang.Hou@nxp.com \
    --to=zhiqiang.hou@nxp.com \
    --cc=andrew.murray@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=gustavo.pimentel@synopsys.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=leoyang.li@nxp.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=minghuan.Lian@nxp.com \
    --cc=mingkai.hu@nxp.com \
    --cc=robh+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=roy.zang@nxp.com \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    --cc=xiaowei.bao@nxp.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).