linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
To: james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
Cc: martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	brking@linux.ibm.com, Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] ibmvscsi: fix race potential race after loss of transport
Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2020 19:13:55 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201025001355.4527-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> (raw)

After a loss of tranport due to an adatper migration or crash/disconnect from
the host partner there is a tiny window where we can race adjusting the
request_limit of the adapter. The request limit is atomically inc/dec to track
the number of inflight requests against the allowed limit of our VIOS partner.
After a transport loss we set the request_limit to zero to reflect this state.
However, there is a window where the adapter may attempt to queue a command
because the transport loss event hasn't been fully processed yet and
request_limit is still greater than zero. The hypercall to send the event will
fail and the error path will increment the request_limit as a result. If the
adapter processes the transport event prior to this increment the request_limit
becomes out of sync with the adapter state and can result in scsi commands being
submitted on the now reset connection prior to an SRP Login resulting in a
protocol violation.

Fix this race by protecting request_limit with the host lock when changing the
value via atomic_set() to indicate no transport.

Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
---
 drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c | 36 +++++++++++++++++++++++---------
 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
index b1f3017b6547..188ed75417a5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvscsi.c
@@ -806,6 +806,22 @@ static void purge_requests(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata, int error_code)
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
 }
 
+/**
+ * ibmvscsi_set_request_limit - Set the adapter request_limit in response to
+ * an adapter failure, reset, or SRP Login. Done under host lock to prevent
+ * race with scsi command submission.
+ * @hostdata:	adapter to adjust
+ * @limit:	new request limit
+ */
+static void ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata, int limit)
+{
+	unsigned long flags;
+
+	spin_lock_irqsave(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
+	atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit, limit);
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
+}
+
 /**
  * ibmvscsi_reset_host - Reset the connection to the server
  * @hostdata:	struct ibmvscsi_host_data to reset
@@ -813,7 +829,7 @@ static void purge_requests(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata, int error_code)
 static void ibmvscsi_reset_host(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata)
 {
 	scsi_block_requests(hostdata->host);
-	atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit, 0);
+	ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(hostdata, 0);
 
 	purge_requests(hostdata, DID_ERROR);
 	hostdata->action = IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_RESET;
@@ -1146,13 +1162,13 @@ static void login_rsp(struct srp_event_struct *evt_struct)
 		dev_info(hostdata->dev, "SRP_LOGIN_REJ reason %u\n",
 			 evt_struct->xfer_iu->srp.login_rej.reason);
 		/* Login failed.  */
-		atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit, -1);
+		ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(hostdata, -1);
 		return;
 	default:
 		dev_err(hostdata->dev, "Invalid login response typecode 0x%02x!\n",
 			evt_struct->xfer_iu->srp.login_rsp.opcode);
 		/* Login failed.  */
-		atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit, -1);
+		ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(hostdata, -1);
 		return;
 	}
 
@@ -1163,7 +1179,7 @@ static void login_rsp(struct srp_event_struct *evt_struct)
 	 * This value is set rather than added to request_limit because
 	 * request_limit could have been set to -1 by this client.
 	 */
-	atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit,
+	ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(hostdata,
 		   be32_to_cpu(evt_struct->xfer_iu->srp.login_rsp.req_lim_delta));
 
 	/* If we had any pending I/Os, kick them */
@@ -1195,13 +1211,13 @@ static int send_srp_login(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata)
 	login->req_buf_fmt = cpu_to_be16(SRP_BUF_FORMAT_DIRECT |
 					 SRP_BUF_FORMAT_INDIRECT);
 
-	spin_lock_irqsave(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
 	/* Start out with a request limit of 0, since this is negotiated in
 	 * the login request we are just sending and login requests always
 	 * get sent by the driver regardless of request_limit.
 	 */
-	atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit, 0);
+	ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(hostdata, 0);
 
+	spin_lock_irqsave(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
 	rc = ibmvscsi_send_srp_event(evt_struct, hostdata, login_timeout * 2);
 	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
 	dev_info(hostdata->dev, "sent SRP login\n");
@@ -1781,7 +1797,7 @@ static void ibmvscsi_handle_crq(struct viosrp_crq *crq,
 		return;
 	case VIOSRP_CRQ_XPORT_EVENT:	/* Hypervisor telling us the connection is closed */
 		scsi_block_requests(hostdata->host);
-		atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit, 0);
+		ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(hostdata, 0);
 		if (crq->format == 0x06) {
 			/* We need to re-setup the interpartition connection */
 			dev_info(hostdata->dev, "Re-enabling adapter!\n");
@@ -2137,12 +2153,12 @@ static void ibmvscsi_do_work(struct ibmvscsi_host_data *hostdata)
 	}
 
 	hostdata->action = IBMVSCSI_HOST_ACTION_NONE;
+	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
 
 	if (rc) {
-		atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit, -1);
+		ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(hostdata, -1);
 		dev_err(hostdata->dev, "error after %s\n", action);
 	}
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hostdata->host->host_lock, flags);
 
 	scsi_unblock_requests(hostdata->host);
 }
@@ -2226,7 +2242,7 @@ static int ibmvscsi_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, const struct vio_device_id *id)
 	init_waitqueue_head(&hostdata->work_wait_q);
 	hostdata->host = host;
 	hostdata->dev = dev;
-	atomic_set(&hostdata->request_limit, -1);
+	ibmvscsi_set_request_limit(hostdata, -1);
 	hostdata->host->max_sectors = IBMVSCSI_MAX_SECTORS_DEFAULT;
 
 	if (map_persist_bufs(hostdata)) {
-- 
2.27.0


             reply	other threads:[~2020-10-25  0:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-25  0:13 Tyrel Datwyler [this message]
2020-10-26 22:17 ` [PATCH] ibmvscsi: fix race potential race after loss of transport Martin K. Petersen
2020-10-28  5:21 ` Michael Ellerman
2020-10-29  1:28   ` Tyrel Datwyler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201025001355.4527-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    --to=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=brking@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).