linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
To: "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	"Borislav Petkov" <bp@alien8.de>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@redhat.com>,
	"Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
	"Randy Dunlap" <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
	"Tony Luck" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
	"Christopherson Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
	"Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@intel.com>,
	"Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"x86" <x86@kernel.org>, Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC v3 1/4] x86/cpufeatures: Enumerate #DB for bus lock detection
Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2020 00:27:11 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201031002714.3649728-2-fenghua.yu@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201031002714.3649728-1-fenghua.yu@intel.com>

A bus lock is acquired either through split locked access to
writeback (WB) memory or by using locks to uncacheable (UC) memory
(e.g. direct device assignment). This is typically >1000 cycles slower
than an atomic operation within a cache line. It also disrupts performance
on other cores.

Some CPUs have ability to notify the kernel by an #DB trap after a user
instruction acquires a bus lock and is executed. This allows the kernel
to enforce user application throttling or mitigations.

The CPU feature flag to be shown in /proc/cpuinfo will be "bus_lock_detect".

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 +
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
index dad350d42ecf..f375d9cb8123 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h
@@ -352,6 +352,7 @@
 #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_VPOPCNTDQ	(16*32+14) /* POPCNT for vectors of DW/QW */
 #define X86_FEATURE_LA57		(16*32+16) /* 5-level page tables */
 #define X86_FEATURE_RDPID		(16*32+22) /* RDPID instruction */
+#define X86_FEATURE_BUS_LOCK_DETECT	(16*32+24) /* Bus Lock detect */
 #define X86_FEATURE_CLDEMOTE		(16*32+25) /* CLDEMOTE instruction */
 #define X86_FEATURE_MOVDIRI		(16*32+27) /* MOVDIRI instruction */
 #define X86_FEATURE_MOVDIR64B		(16*32+28) /* MOVDIR64B instruction */
-- 
2.29.1


  reply	other threads:[~2020-10-31  0:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-10-31  0:27 [PATCH RFC v3 0/4] x86/bus_lock: Enable bus lock detection Fenghua Yu
2020-10-31  0:27 ` Fenghua Yu [this message]
2020-10-31  0:27 ` [PATCH RFC v3 2/4] x86/bus_lock: Handle warn and fatal in #DB for bus lock Fenghua Yu
2020-11-03 12:15   ` Xiaoyao Li
2020-11-06 20:31     ` Fenghua Yu
2020-10-31  0:27 ` [PATCH RFC v3 3/4] x86/bus_lock: Set rate limit " Fenghua Yu
2020-10-31  0:27 ` [PATCH RFC v3 4/4] Documentation/admin-guide: Change doc for split_lock_detect parameter Fenghua Yu
2020-10-31  3:14   ` Randy Dunlap
2020-11-02 17:03     ` Fenghua Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201031002714.3649728-2-fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --to=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
    --cc=ashok.raj@intel.com \
    --cc=bp@alien8.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    --cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).