[PATCH 2/6] timekeeping: add missed kernel-doc marks for 'tkf'

From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
To: john.stultz@linaro.org
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 2/6] timekeeping: add missed kernel-doc marks for 'tkf'
Date: Fri, 13 Nov 2020 15:24:31 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1605252275-63652-2-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1605252275-63652-1-git-send-email-alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>

Fix the kernel-doc markup and remove the following warning:
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:415: warning: Function parameter or member
'tkf' not described in 'update_fast_timekeeper'
kernel/time/timekeeping.c:464: warning: Function parameter or member
'tkf' not described in '__ktime_get_fast_ns'

Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
---
 kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
index daa0ff017819..d0f7cd1b8823 100644
--- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
+++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c
@@ -399,6 +399,7 @@ static inline u64 timekeeping_cycles_to_ns(const struct tk_read_base *tkr, u64 c
 /**
  * update_fast_timekeeper - Update the fast and NMI safe monotonic timekeeper.
  * @tkr: Timekeeping readout base from which we take the update
+ * @tkf: NMI safe timekeeper
  *
  * We want to use this from any context including NMI and tracing /
  * instrumenting the timekeeping code itself.
@@ -430,6 +431,7 @@ static void update_fast_timekeeper(const struct tk_read_base *tkr,
 
 /**
  * ktime_get_mono_fast_ns - Fast NMI safe access to clock monotonic
+ * @tkf: NMI safe timekeeper
  *
  * This timestamp is not guaranteed to be monotonic across an update.
  * The timestamp is calculated by:
-- 
2.29.GIT

