From: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
To: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>,
Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>, Sean Paul <sean@poorly.run>,
David Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>,
linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM
ADRENO GPU),
freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org (open list:DRM DRIVER FOR MSM
ADRENO GPU), linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org (open list)
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] drm/msm/shrinker: Only iterate dontneed objs
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2020 09:48:51 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201116174851.878426-4-robdclark@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201116174851.878426-1-robdclark@gmail.com>
From: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
In situations where the GPU is mostly idle, all or nearly all buffer
objects will be in the inactive list. But if the system is under memory
pressure (from something other than GPU), we could still get a lot of
shrinker calls. Which results in traversing a list of thousands of objs
and in the end finding nothing to shrink. Which isn't so efficient.
Instead split the inactive_list into two lists, one inactive objs which
are shrinkable, and a second one for those that are not. This way we
can avoid traversing objs which we know are not shrinker candidates.
v2: Fix inverted logic think-o
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark <robdclark@chromium.org>
---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c | 3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h | 8 +++---
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++------
drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c | 7 +++---
5 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
index 64afbed89821..85ad0babc326 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_debugfs.c
@@ -124,7 +124,8 @@ static int msm_gem_show(struct drm_device *dev, struct seq_file *m)
}
seq_printf(m, "Inactive Objects:\n");
- msm_gem_describe_objects(&priv->inactive_list, m);
+ msm_gem_describe_objects(&priv->inactive_dontneed, m);
+ msm_gem_describe_objects(&priv->inactive_willneed, m);
mutex_unlock(&priv->mm_lock);
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
index 4d808769e6ed..39a54f364aa8 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.c
@@ -465,7 +465,8 @@ static int msm_drm_init(struct device *dev, struct drm_driver *drv)
priv->wq = alloc_ordered_workqueue("msm", 0);
- INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->inactive_list);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->inactive_willneed);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&priv->inactive_dontneed);
mutex_init(&priv->mm_lock);
/* Teach lockdep about lock ordering wrt. shrinker: */
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
index f869ed67b5da..ed18c5bed10f 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_drv.h
@@ -175,8 +175,9 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
struct msm_perf_state *perf;
/*
- * List of inactive GEM objects. Every bo is either in the inactive_list
- * or gpu->active_list (for the gpu it is active on[1])
+ * Lists of inactive GEM objects. Every bo is either in one of the
+ * inactive lists (depending on whether or not it is shrinkable) or
+ * gpu->active_list (for the gpu it is active on[1])
*
* These lists are protected by mm_lock. If struct_mutex is involved, it
* should be aquired prior to mm_lock. One should *not* hold mm_lock in
@@ -185,7 +186,8 @@ struct msm_drm_private {
* [1] if someone ever added support for the old 2d cores, there could be
* more than one gpu object
*/
- struct list_head inactive_list;
+ struct list_head inactive_willneed; /* inactive + !shrinkable */
+ struct list_head inactive_dontneed; /* inactive + shrinkable */
struct mutex mm_lock;
struct workqueue_struct *wq;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
index 2795288b0a95..318ccc2fae86 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
#include "msm_gpu.h"
#include "msm_mmu.h"
+static void update_inactive(struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj);
static dma_addr_t physaddr(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
{
@@ -678,6 +679,12 @@ int msm_gem_madvise(struct drm_gem_object *obj, unsigned madv)
madv = msm_obj->madv;
+ /* If the obj is inactive, we might need to move it
+ * between inactive lists
+ */
+ if (msm_obj->active_count == 0)
+ update_inactive(msm_obj);
+
msm_gem_unlock(obj);
return (madv != __MSM_MADV_PURGED);
@@ -781,19 +788,31 @@ void msm_gem_active_get(struct drm_gem_object *obj, struct msm_gpu *gpu)
void msm_gem_active_put(struct drm_gem_object *obj)
{
struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj = to_msm_bo(obj);
- struct msm_drm_private *priv = obj->dev->dev_private;
might_sleep();
WARN_ON(!msm_gem_is_locked(obj));
if (--msm_obj->active_count == 0) {
- mutex_lock(&priv->mm_lock);
- list_del_init(&msm_obj->mm_list);
- list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_list);
- mutex_unlock(&priv->mm_lock);
+ update_inactive(msm_obj);
}
}
+static void update_inactive(struct msm_gem_object *msm_obj)
+{
+ struct msm_drm_private *priv = msm_obj->base.dev->dev_private;
+
+ mutex_lock(&priv->mm_lock);
+ WARN_ON(msm_obj->active_count != 0);
+
+ list_del_init(&msm_obj->mm_list);
+ if (msm_obj->madv == MSM_MADV_WILLNEED)
+ list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_willneed);
+ else
+ list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_dontneed);
+
+ mutex_unlock(&priv->mm_lock);
+}
+
int msm_gem_cpu_prep(struct drm_gem_object *obj, uint32_t op, ktime_t *timeout)
{
bool write = !!(op & MSM_PREP_WRITE);
@@ -1099,7 +1118,8 @@ static struct drm_gem_object *_msm_gem_new(struct drm_device *dev,
}
mutex_lock(&priv->mm_lock);
- list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_list);
+ /* Initially obj is idle, obj->madv == WILLNEED: */
+ list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_willneed);
mutex_unlock(&priv->mm_lock);
return obj;
@@ -1169,7 +1189,7 @@ struct drm_gem_object *msm_gem_import(struct drm_device *dev,
msm_gem_unlock(obj);
mutex_lock(&priv->mm_lock);
- list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_list);
+ list_add_tail(&msm_obj->mm_list, &priv->inactive_willneed);
mutex_unlock(&priv->mm_lock);
return obj;
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
index 9d51c1eb808d..81dfa57b6a0d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
+++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/msm_gem_shrinker.c
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ msm_gem_shrinker_count(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
mutex_lock(&priv->mm_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(msm_obj, &priv->inactive_list, mm_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(msm_obj, &priv->inactive_dontneed, mm_list) {
if (!msm_gem_trylock(&msm_obj->base))
continue;
if (is_purgeable(msm_obj))
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ msm_gem_shrinker_scan(struct shrinker *shrinker, struct shrink_control *sc)
mutex_lock(&priv->mm_lock);
- list_for_each_entry(msm_obj, &priv->inactive_list, mm_list) {
+ list_for_each_entry(msm_obj, &priv->inactive_dontneed, mm_list) {
if (freed >= sc->nr_to_scan)
break;
if (!msm_gem_trylock(&msm_obj->base))
@@ -96,7 +96,8 @@ msm_gem_shrinker_vmap(struct notifier_block *nb, unsigned long event, void *ptr)
struct msm_drm_private *priv =
container_of(nb, struct msm_drm_private, vmap_notifier);
struct list_head *mm_lists[] = {
- &priv->inactive_list,
+ &priv->inactive_dontneed,
+ &priv->inactive_willneed,
priv->gpu ? &priv->gpu->active_list : NULL,
NULL,
};
--
2.28.0
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-16 17:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-16 17:48 [PATCH v2 0/3] drm/msm: Shrinker fixes and opts Rob Clark
2020-11-16 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] drm/msm: Protect obj->active_count under obj lock Rob Clark
2020-11-16 17:48 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] drm/msm/shrinker: We can vmap shrink active_list too Rob Clark
2020-11-16 17:48 ` Rob Clark [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201116174851.878426-4-robdclark@gmail.com \
--to=robdclark@gmail.com \
--cc=airlied@linux.ie \
--cc=daniel@ffwll.ch \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=freedreno@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robdclark@chromium.org \
--cc=sean@poorly.run \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).