From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 2/5] ACPI: EC: Rename acpi_ec_is_gpe_raised()
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 20:37:46 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2429516.i4tuDyKFJZ@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3259005.CeRvrUlyd7@kreacher>
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Rename acpi_ec_is_gpe_raised() into acpi_ec_gpe_status_set(),
update its callers accordingly and drop the ternary operator
(which isn't really necessary in there) from it.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/ec.c | 8 ++++----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/acpi/ec.c b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
index 97e595238a8c..c4be16a495e1 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/ec.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/ec.c
@@ -335,12 +335,12 @@ static const char *acpi_ec_cmd_string(u8 cmd)
* GPE Registers
* -------------------------------------------------------------------------- */
-static inline bool acpi_ec_is_gpe_raised(struct acpi_ec *ec)
+static inline bool acpi_ec_gpe_status_set(struct acpi_ec *ec)
{
acpi_event_status gpe_status = 0;
(void)acpi_get_gpe_status(NULL, ec->gpe, &gpe_status);
- return (gpe_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_STATUS_SET) ? true : false;
+ return !!(gpe_status & ACPI_EVENT_FLAG_STATUS_SET);
}
static inline void acpi_ec_enable_gpe(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool open)
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@ static inline void acpi_ec_enable_gpe(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool open)
BUG_ON(ec->reference_count < 1);
acpi_set_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe, ACPI_GPE_ENABLE);
}
- if (acpi_ec_is_gpe_raised(ec)) {
+ if (acpi_ec_gpe_status_set(ec)) {
/*
* On some platforms, EN=1 writes cannot trigger GPE. So
* software need to manually trigger a pseudo GPE event on
@@ -635,7 +635,7 @@ static void advance_transaction(struct acpi_ec *ec, bool interrupt)
* 2. As long as software can ensure only clearing it when it is set,
* hardware won't set it in parallel.
*/
- if (ec->gpe >= 0 && acpi_ec_is_gpe_raised(ec))
+ if (ec->gpe >= 0 && acpi_ec_gpe_status_set(ec))
acpi_clear_gpe(NULL, ec->gpe);
status = acpi_ec_read_status(ec);
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 19:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-23 19:35 [PATCH 0/5] ACPI: EC: Cleanups in advance_transaction() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-23 19:37 ` [PATCH 1/5] ACPI: EC: Fold acpi_ec_clear_gpe() into its caller Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-23 19:37 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2020-11-23 19:38 ` [PATCH 3/5] ACPI: EC: Simplify error handling in advance_transaction() Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-23 19:39 ` [PATCH 4/5] ACPI: EC: Untangle " Rafael J. Wysocki
2020-11-23 19:40 ` [PATCH 5/5] ACPI: EC: Clean up status flags checks " Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2429516.i4tuDyKFJZ@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).