Message ID | 20201127165421.2692469-1-trix@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | New, archived |
Headers | show |
Series |
|
Related | show |
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 08:54:21AM -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote: > From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > > The macro use will already have a semicolon. > > Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> > --- > drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c | 4 ++-- > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c b/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c > index 27e8e0c9e8cf..0238600107b0 100644 > --- a/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c > +++ b/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c > @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ > #include "altera-jtag.h" > > #define alt_jtag_io(a, b, c)\ > - astate->config->jtag_io(astate->config->dev, a, b, c); > + astate->config->jtag_io(astate->config->dev, a, b, c) > > -#define alt_malloc(a) kzalloc(a, GFP_KERNEL); > +#define alt_malloc(a) kzalloc(a, GFP_KERNEL) Ick, really? That macro should be removed entirely. Can you redo this as a 2 patch series, the first for the alt_jtag_io() change, and the other to remove all users of alt_malloc()? thanks, greg k-h
On 11/27/20 9:03 AM, Greg KH wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 08:54:21AM -0800, trix@redhat.com wrote: >> From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >> >> The macro use will already have a semicolon. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com> >> --- >> drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c | 4 ++-- >> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c b/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c >> index 27e8e0c9e8cf..0238600107b0 100644 >> --- a/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c >> +++ b/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c >> @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ >> #include "altera-jtag.h" >> >> #define alt_jtag_io(a, b, c)\ >> - astate->config->jtag_io(astate->config->dev, a, b, c); >> + astate->config->jtag_io(astate->config->dev, a, b, c) >> >> -#define alt_malloc(a) kzalloc(a, GFP_KERNEL); >> +#define alt_malloc(a) kzalloc(a, GFP_KERNEL) > Ick, really? That macro should be removed entirely. Can you redo this > as a 2 patch series, the first for the alt_jtag_io() change, and the > other to remove all users of alt_malloc()? yes. It may be a bit, I would like to see if there are other similar wrappers. Tom > > thanks, > > greg k-h >
diff --git a/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c b/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c index 27e8e0c9e8cf..0238600107b0 100644 --- a/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c +++ b/drivers/misc/altera-stapl/altera-jtag.c @@ -17,9 +17,9 @@ #include "altera-jtag.h" #define alt_jtag_io(a, b, c)\ - astate->config->jtag_io(astate->config->dev, a, b, c); + astate->config->jtag_io(astate->config->dev, a, b, c) -#define alt_malloc(a) kzalloc(a, GFP_KERNEL); +#define alt_malloc(a) kzalloc(a, GFP_KERNEL) /* * This structure shows, for each JTAG state, which state is reached after