From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
To: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v5 11/16] memblock: fix kernel-doc markups
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:09:04 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <6928fde0940ef3cf077794706b54a35da152b745.1606823973.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <cover.1606823973.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
Some identifiers have different names between their prototypes
and the kernel-doc markup.
Acked-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@kernel.org>
---
include/linux/memblock.h | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memblock.h b/include/linux/memblock.h
index b93c44b9121e..9cc6da7b513e 100644
--- a/include/linux/memblock.h
+++ b/include/linux/memblock.h
@@ -243,85 +243,85 @@ static inline bool memblock_is_mirror(struct memblock_region *m)
return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_MIRROR;
}
static inline bool memblock_is_nomap(struct memblock_region *m)
{
return m->flags & MEMBLOCK_NOMAP;
}
int memblock_search_pfn_nid(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long *start_pfn,
unsigned long *end_pfn);
void __next_mem_pfn_range(int *idx, int nid, unsigned long *out_start_pfn,
unsigned long *out_end_pfn, int *out_nid);
/**
* for_each_mem_pfn_range - early memory pfn range iterator
* @i: an integer used as loop variable
* @nid: node selector, %MAX_NUMNODES for all nodes
* @p_start: ptr to ulong for start pfn of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_end: ptr to ulong for end pfn of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_nid: ptr to int for nid of the range, can be %NULL
*
* Walks over configured memory ranges.
*/
#define for_each_mem_pfn_range(i, nid, p_start, p_end, p_nid) \
for (i = -1, __next_mem_pfn_range(&i, nid, p_start, p_end, p_nid); \
i >= 0; __next_mem_pfn_range(&i, nid, p_start, p_end, p_nid))
#ifdef CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT
void __next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(u64 *idx, struct zone *zone,
unsigned long *out_spfn,
unsigned long *out_epfn);
/**
- * for_each_free_mem_range_in_zone - iterate through zone specific free
+ * for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone - iterate through zone specific free
* memblock areas
* @i: u64 used as loop variable
* @zone: zone in which all of the memory blocks reside
* @p_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
*
* Walks over free (memory && !reserved) areas of memblock in a specific
* zone. Available once memblock and an empty zone is initialized. The main
* assumption is that the zone start, end, and pgdat have been associated.
* This way we can use the zone to determine NUMA node, and if a given part
* of the memblock is valid for the zone.
*/
#define for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(i, zone, p_start, p_end) \
for (i = 0, \
__next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, p_start, p_end); \
i != U64_MAX; \
__next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, p_start, p_end))
/**
- * for_each_free_mem_range_in_zone_from - iterate through zone specific
+ * for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from - iterate through zone specific
* free memblock areas from a given point
* @i: u64 used as loop variable
* @zone: zone in which all of the memory blocks reside
* @p_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
*
* Walks over free (memory && !reserved) areas of memblock in a specific
* zone, continuing from current position. Available as soon as memblock is
* initialized.
*/
#define for_each_free_mem_pfn_range_in_zone_from(i, zone, p_start, p_end) \
for (; i != U64_MAX; \
__next_mem_pfn_range_in_zone(&i, zone, p_start, p_end))
int __init deferred_page_init_max_threads(const struct cpumask *node_cpumask);
#endif /* CONFIG_DEFERRED_STRUCT_PAGE_INIT */
/**
* for_each_free_mem_range - iterate through free memblock areas
* @i: u64 used as loop variable
* @nid: node selector, %NUMA_NO_NODE for all nodes
* @flags: pick from blocks based on memory attributes
* @p_start: ptr to phys_addr_t for start address of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_end: ptr to phys_addr_t for end address of the range, can be %NULL
* @p_nid: ptr to int for nid of the range, can be %NULL
*
* Walks over free (memory && !reserved) areas of memblock. Available as
* soon as memblock is initialized.
*/
#define for_each_free_mem_range(i, nid, flags, p_start, p_end, p_nid) \
__for_each_mem_range(i, &memblock.memory, &memblock.reserved, \
--
2.28.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 12:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 12:08 [PATCH v5 00/16]Fix several bad kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 01/16] HSI: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-02 21:38 ` Sebastian Reichel
2020-12-01 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 02/16] IB: fix kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-07 19:46 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-12-01 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 03/16] parport: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 04/16] rapidio: fix kernel-doc a markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 05/16] fs: fix kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:43 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-01 14:06 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:08 ` [PATCH v5 06/16] pstore/zone: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 07/16] completion: drop init_completion define Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 14:03 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-02 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 08/16] firmware: stratix10-svc: fix kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 09/16] connector: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 10/16] lib/crc7: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:09 ` Mauro Carvalho Chehab [this message]
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 12/16] w1: " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 13/16] sched: fix " Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-02 8:13 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-02 14:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 14/16] selftests: kselftest_harness.h: partially fix kernel-doc markups Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 21:17 ` Kees Cook
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 15/16] refcount.h: fix a kernel-doc markup Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 21:17 ` Kees Cook
2020-12-02 8:14 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-12-01 12:09 ` [PATCH v5 16/16] scripts: kernel-doc: validate kernel-doc markup with the actual names Mauro Carvalho Chehab
2020-12-01 15:06 ` kernel test robot
2020-12-01 15:25 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=6928fde0940ef3cf077794706b54a35da152b745.1606823973.git.mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--to=mchehab+huawei@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=rppt@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).