From: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
To: <bpf@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: <ast@kernel.org>, <daniel@iogearbox.net>,
<netdev@vger.kernel.org>, <andrii@kernel.org>,
<akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@fb.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v9 03/34] mm: introduce page memcg flags
Date: Tue, 1 Dec 2020 13:58:29 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201201215900.3569844-4-guro@fb.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201201215900.3569844-1-guro@fb.com>
The lowest bit in page->memcg_data is used to distinguish between struct
memory_cgroup pointer and a pointer to a objcgs array. All checks and
modifications of this bit are open-coded.
Let's formalize it using page memcg flags, defined in enum
page_memcg_data_flags.
Additional flags might be added later.
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201027001657.3398190-4-guro@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Acked-by: Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index c7ac0a5b8989..99a4841d658b 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -343,6 +343,15 @@ struct mem_cgroup {
extern struct mem_cgroup *root_mem_cgroup;
+enum page_memcg_data_flags {
+ /* page->memcg_data is a pointer to an objcgs vector */
+ MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS = (1UL << 0),
+ /* the next bit after the last actual flag */
+ __NR_MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS = (1UL << 1),
+};
+
+#define MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS_MASK (__NR_MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS - 1)
+
/*
* page_memcg - get the memory cgroup associated with a page
* @page: a pointer to the page struct
@@ -404,13 +413,7 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_memcg_check(struct page *page)
*/
unsigned long memcg_data = READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data);
- /*
- * The lowest bit set means that memcg isn't a valid
- * memcg pointer, but a obj_cgroups pointer.
- * In this case the page is shared and doesn't belong
- * to any specific memory cgroup.
- */
- if (memcg_data & 0x1UL)
+ if (memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS)
return NULL;
return (struct mem_cgroup *)memcg_data;
@@ -429,7 +432,11 @@ static inline struct mem_cgroup *page_memcg_check(struct page *page)
*/
static inline struct obj_cgroup **page_objcgs(struct page *page)
{
- return (struct obj_cgroup **)(READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data) & ~0x1UL);
+ unsigned long memcg_data = READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data);
+
+ VM_BUG_ON_PAGE(memcg_data && !(memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS), page);
+
+ return (struct obj_cgroup **)(memcg_data & ~MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS_MASK);
}
/*
@@ -444,10 +451,10 @@ static inline struct obj_cgroup **page_objcgs_check(struct page *page)
{
unsigned long memcg_data = READ_ONCE(page->memcg_data);
- if (memcg_data && (memcg_data & 0x1UL))
- return (struct obj_cgroup **)(memcg_data & ~0x1UL);
+ if (!memcg_data || !(memcg_data & MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS))
+ return NULL;
- return NULL;
+ return (struct obj_cgroup **)(memcg_data & ~MEMCG_DATA_FLAGS_MASK);
}
/*
@@ -460,7 +467,8 @@ static inline struct obj_cgroup **page_objcgs_check(struct page *page)
static inline bool set_page_objcgs(struct page *page,
struct obj_cgroup **objcgs)
{
- return !cmpxchg(&page->memcg_data, 0, (unsigned long)objcgs | 0x1UL);
+ return !cmpxchg(&page->memcg_data, 0, (unsigned long)objcgs |
+ MEMCG_DATA_OBJCGS);
}
#else
static inline struct obj_cgroup **page_objcgs(struct page *page)
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-12-01 22:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-12-01 21:58 [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 01/34] mm: memcontrol: use helpers to read page's memcg data Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 02/34] mm: memcontrol/slab: use helpers to access slab page's memcg_data Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` Roman Gushchin [this message]
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 04/34] mm: convert page kmemcg type to a page memcg flag Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 05/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 06/34] bpf: prepare for memcg-based memory accounting for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 07/34] bpf: " Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 08/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 09/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 10/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 11/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 12/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 13/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 14/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 15/34] bpf: memcg-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 16/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 17/34] bpf: refine memcg-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 18/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for arraymap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 19/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf_struct_ops maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 20/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cpumap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 21/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for cgroup storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 22/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for devmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 23/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for hashtab maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 24/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for lpm_trie maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 25/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for queue_stack_maps maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 26/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for reuseport_array maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 27/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf ringbuffer Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 28/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for sockmap and sockhash maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 29/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for stackmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 30/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for xskmap maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 31/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf local storage maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 32/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting infra for bpf maps Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:58 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 33/34] bpf: eliminate rlimit-based memory accounting for bpf progs Roman Gushchin
2020-12-01 21:59 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 34/34] bpf: samples: do not touch RLIMIT_MEMLOCK Roman Gushchin
2020-12-03 2:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v9 00/34] bpf: switch to memcg-based memory accounting patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2020-12-03 2:54 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2020-12-03 3:26 ` Roman Gushchin
2020-12-05 0:37 ` Daniel Borkmann
2020-12-08 2:53 ` Andrii Nakryiko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20201201215900.3569844-4-guro@fb.com \
--to=guro@fb.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).