linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: syzbot+9b64b619f10f19d19a7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/uprobes: Do not use prefixes.nbytes when looping over prefixes.bytes
Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:04:03 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160709424307.3364.5849503551045240938.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160697103739.3146288.7437620795200799020.stgit@devnote2>

The following commit has been merged into the x86/urgent branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     9dc23f960adb9ce410ef835b32a2398fdb09c828
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/9dc23f960adb9ce410ef835b32a2398fdb09c828
Author:        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
AuthorDate:    Thu, 03 Dec 2020 13:50:37 +09:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
CommitterDate: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 14:32:57 +01:00

x86/uprobes: Do not use prefixes.nbytes when looping over prefixes.bytes

Since insn.prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than the size of
insn.prefixes.bytes[] when a prefix is repeated, the proper check must
be

  insn.prefixes.bytes[i] != 0 and i < 4

instead of using insn.prefixes.nbytes.

Introduce a for_each_insn_prefix() macro for this purpose. Debugged by
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>.

 [ bp: Massage commit message, sync with the respective header in tools/
   and drop "we". ]

Fixes: 2b1444983508 ("uprobes, mm, x86: Add the ability to install and remove uprobes breakpoints")
Reported-by: syzbot+9b64b619f10f19d19a7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Reviewed-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160697103739.3146288.7437620795200799020.stgit@devnote2
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h       | 15 +++++++++++++++
 arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c         | 10 ++++++----
 tools/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h | 17 ++++++++++++++++-
 3 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
index 5c1ae3e..a8c3d28 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
@@ -201,6 +201,21 @@ static inline int insn_offset_immediate(struct insn *insn)
 	return insn_offset_displacement(insn) + insn->displacement.nbytes;
 }
 
+/**
+ * for_each_insn_prefix() -- Iterate prefixes in the instruction
+ * @insn: Pointer to struct insn.
+ * @idx:  Index storage.
+ * @prefix: Prefix byte.
+ *
+ * Iterate prefix bytes of given @insn. Each prefix byte is stored in @prefix
+ * and the index is stored in @idx (note that this @idx is just for a cursor,
+ * do not change it.)
+ * Since prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than 4 if some prefixes
+ * are repeated, it cannot be used for looping over the prefixes.
+ */
+#define for_each_insn_prefix(insn, idx, prefix)	\
+	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(insn->prefixes.bytes) && (prefix = insn->prefixes.bytes[idx]) != 0; idx++)
+
 #define POP_SS_OPCODE 0x1f
 #define MOV_SREG_OPCODE 0x8e
 
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
index 3fdaa04..138bdb1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/uprobes.c
@@ -255,12 +255,13 @@ static volatile u32 good_2byte_insns[256 / 32] = {
 
 static bool is_prefix_bad(struct insn *insn)
 {
+	insn_byte_t p;
 	int i;
 
-	for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
+	for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
 		insn_attr_t attr;
 
-		attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(insn->prefixes.bytes[i]);
+		attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute(p);
 		switch (attr) {
 		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_ES):
 		case INAT_MAKE_PREFIX(INAT_PFX_CS):
@@ -715,6 +716,7 @@ static const struct uprobe_xol_ops push_xol_ops = {
 static int branch_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
 {
 	u8 opc1 = OPCODE1(insn);
+	insn_byte_t p;
 	int i;
 
 	switch (opc1) {
@@ -746,8 +748,8 @@ static int branch_setup_xol_ops(struct arch_uprobe *auprobe, struct insn *insn)
 	 * Intel and AMD behavior differ in 64-bit mode: Intel ignores 66 prefix.
 	 * No one uses these insns, reject any branch insns with such prefix.
 	 */
-	for (i = 0; i < insn->prefixes.nbytes; i++) {
-		if (insn->prefixes.bytes[i] == 0x66)
+	for_each_insn_prefix(insn, i, p) {
+		if (p == 0x66)
 			return -ENOTSUPP;
 	}
 
diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
index 568854b..a8c3d28 100644
--- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
+++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/insn.h
@@ -8,7 +8,7 @@
  */
 
 /* insn_attr_t is defined in inat.h */
-#include "inat.h"
+#include <asm/inat.h>
 
 struct insn_field {
 	union {
@@ -201,6 +201,21 @@ static inline int insn_offset_immediate(struct insn *insn)
 	return insn_offset_displacement(insn) + insn->displacement.nbytes;
 }
 
+/**
+ * for_each_insn_prefix() -- Iterate prefixes in the instruction
+ * @insn: Pointer to struct insn.
+ * @idx:  Index storage.
+ * @prefix: Prefix byte.
+ *
+ * Iterate prefix bytes of given @insn. Each prefix byte is stored in @prefix
+ * and the index is stored in @idx (note that this @idx is just for a cursor,
+ * do not change it.)
+ * Since prefixes.nbytes can be bigger than 4 if some prefixes
+ * are repeated, it cannot be used for looping over the prefixes.
+ */
+#define for_each_insn_prefix(insn, idx, prefix)	\
+	for (idx = 0; idx < ARRAY_SIZE(insn->prefixes.bytes) && (prefix = insn->prefixes.bytes[idx]) != 0; idx++)
+
 #define POP_SS_OPCODE 0x1f
 #define MOV_SREG_OPCODE 0x8e
 

  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-04 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-03  4:50 [PATCH v2 0/3] x86/insn: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] x86/uprobes: " Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-03 12:37   ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 12:41     ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 12:48       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 16:45         ` Tom Lendacky
2020-12-03 16:54           ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 17:01             ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 18:10               ` Tom Lendacky
2020-12-03 18:17                 ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-03 18:49                   ` Tom Lendacky
2020-12-04  0:56                     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04  3:55                       ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 11:06                       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-04 11:28                         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04  0:16           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04  0:18     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 15:04   ` tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu [this message]
2020-12-05  0:12     ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/uprobes: Do not use prefixes.nbytes when looping " Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-05 10:17       ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-06  3:53         ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-06  9:02           ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-09 18:01             ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-12-10 10:36               ` Borislav Petkov
2020-12-09 18:05       ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2020-12-06  9:09   ` tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-03  4:50 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] x86/insn-eval: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop " Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 15:04   ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/insn-eval: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop over prefixes bytes tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-06  9:09   ` tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-03  4:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] x86/sev-es: Fix not using prefixes.nbytes for loop over prefixes.bytes Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-04 15:04   ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/sev-es: Use new for_each_insn_prefix() macro to loop over prefixes bytes tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-06  9:09   ` tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160709424307.3364.5849503551045240938.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=syzbot+9b64b619f10f19d19a7c@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).