linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
	Vincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 4/7] watchdog/softlockup: Remove logic that tried to prevent repeated reports
Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2020 17:00:35 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20201210160038.31441-5-pmladek@suse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201210160038.31441-1-pmladek@suse.com>

The softlockup detector does some gymnastic with the variable
soft_watchdog_warn. It was added by the commit 58687acba59266735ad
("lockup_detector: Combine nmi_watchdog and softlockup detector").

The purpose is not completely clear. There are the following clues.
They describe the situation how it looked after the above mentioned
commit:

  1. The variable was checked with a comment "only warn once".

  2. The variable was set when softlockup was reported. It was cleared
     only when the CPU was not longer in the softlockup state.

  3. watchdog_touch_ts was not explicitly updated when the softlockup
     was reported. Without this variable, the report would normally
     be printed again during every following watchdog_timer_fn()
     invocation.

The logic has got even more tangled up by the commit ed235875e2ca98
("kernel/watchdog.c: print traces for all cpus on lockup detection").
After this commit, soft_watchdog_warn is set only when
softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace is enabled. But multiple reports
from all CPUs are prevented by a new variable soft_lockup_nmi_warn.

Conclusion:

The variable probably never worked as intended. In each case, it has
not worked last many years because the softlockup was reported
repeatedly after the full period defined by watchdog_thresh.

The reason is that watchdog gets touched in many known slow paths,
for example, in printk_stack_address(). This code is called also when
printing the softlockup report. It means that the watchdog timestamp
gets updated after each report.

Solution:

Simply remove the logic. People want the periodic report anyway.

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
---
 kernel/watchdog.c | 14 ++------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/watchdog.c b/kernel/watchdog.c
index 6259590d6474..dc8a0bf943f5 100644
--- a/kernel/watchdog.c
+++ b/kernel/watchdog.c
@@ -179,7 +179,6 @@ static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, watchdog_touch_ts);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, watchdog_report_ts);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct hrtimer, watchdog_hrtimer);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, softlockup_touch_sync);
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, soft_watchdog_warn);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hrtimer_interrupts);
 static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long, hrtimer_interrupts_saved);
 static unsigned long soft_lockup_nmi_warn;
@@ -410,19 +409,12 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 		if (kvm_check_and_clear_guest_paused())
 			return HRTIMER_RESTART;
 
-		/* only warn once */
-		if (__this_cpu_read(soft_watchdog_warn) == true)
-			return HRTIMER_RESTART;
-
 		if (softlockup_all_cpu_backtrace) {
 			/* Prevent multiple soft-lockup reports if one cpu is already
 			 * engaged in dumping cpu back traces
 			 */
-			if (test_and_set_bit(0, &soft_lockup_nmi_warn)) {
-				/* Someone else will report us. Let's give up */
-				__this_cpu_write(soft_watchdog_warn, true);
+			if (test_and_set_bit(0, &soft_lockup_nmi_warn))
 				return HRTIMER_RESTART;
-			}
 		}
 
 		/* Start period for the next softlockup warning. */
@@ -452,9 +444,7 @@ static enum hrtimer_restart watchdog_timer_fn(struct hrtimer *hrtimer)
 		add_taint(TAINT_SOFTLOCKUP, LOCKDEP_STILL_OK);
 		if (softlockup_panic)
 			panic("softlockup: hung tasks");
-		__this_cpu_write(soft_watchdog_warn, true);
-	} else
-		__this_cpu_write(soft_watchdog_warn, false);
+	}
 
 	return HRTIMER_RESTART;
 }
-- 
2.26.2


  parent reply	other threads:[~2020-12-10 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-10 16:00 [PATCH v2 0/7] watchdog/softlockup: Report overall time and some cleanup Petr Mladek
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] watchdog: Rename __touch_watchdog() to a better descriptive name Petr Mladek
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] watchdog: Explicitly update timestamp when reporting softlockup Petr Mladek
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] watchdog/softlockup: Report the overall time of softlockups Petr Mladek
2020-12-10 16:00 ` Petr Mladek [this message]
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] watchdog: Fix barriers when printing backtraces from all CPUs Petr Mladek
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] watchdog: Cleanup handling of false positives Petr Mladek
2020-12-10 16:00 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] Test softlockup Petr Mladek
2021-01-03 15:03   ` 3cc3ef45b2: RIP:version_proc_show kernel test robot
2021-01-05  9:37     ` Petr Mladek
2021-03-11 12:21 [PATCH v2 0/7] watchdog/softlockup: Report overall time and some cleanup Petr Mladek
2021-03-11 12:21 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] watchdog/softlockup: Remove logic that tried to prevent repeated reports Petr Mladek

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20201210160038.31441-5-pmladek@suse.com \
    --to=pmladek@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=loberman@redhat.com \
    --cc=mhocko@suse.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=vincent.whitchurch@axis.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).