linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu" <tip-bot2@linutronix.de>
To: linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
	"Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [tip: perf/kprobes] x86/kprobes: Do not decode opcode in resume_execution()
Date: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 14:47:51 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <160985807183.414.394791965475735165.tip-bot2@tip-bot2> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <160830072561.349576.3014979564448023213.stgit@devnote2>

The following commit has been merged into the perf/kprobes branch of tip:

Commit-ID:     abd82e533d88df1521e3da6799b83ce88852ab88
Gitweb:        https://git.kernel.org/tip/abd82e533d88df1521e3da6799b83ce88852ab88
Author:        Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
AuthorDate:    Fri, 18 Dec 2020 23:12:05 +09:00
Committer:     Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
CommitterDate: Tue, 05 Jan 2021 15:42:30 +01:00

x86/kprobes: Do not decode opcode in resume_execution()

Currently, kprobes decodes the opcode right after single-stepping in
resume_execution(). But the opcode was already decoded while preparing
arch_specific_insn in arch_copy_kprobe().

Decode the opcode in arch_copy_kprobe() instead of in resume_execution()
and set some flags which classify the opcode for the resuming process.

 [ bp: Massage commit message. ]

Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>
Acked-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/160830072561.349576.3014979564448023213.stgit@devnote2
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h |  11 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c | 168 ++++++++++++++------------------
 2 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 98 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
index 991a7ad..d20a3d6 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kprobes.h
@@ -58,14 +58,17 @@ struct arch_specific_insn {
 	/* copy of the original instruction */
 	kprobe_opcode_t *insn;
 	/*
-	 * boostable = false: This instruction type is not boostable.
-	 * boostable = true: This instruction has been boosted: we have
+	 * boostable = 0: This instruction type is not boostable.
+	 * boostable = 1: This instruction has been boosted: we have
 	 * added a relative jump after the instruction copy in insn,
 	 * so no single-step and fixup are needed (unless there's
 	 * a post_handler).
 	 */
-	bool boostable;
-	bool if_modifier;
+	unsigned boostable:1;
+	unsigned if_modifier:1;
+	unsigned is_call:1;
+	unsigned is_pushf:1;
+	unsigned is_abs_ip:1;
 	/* Number of bytes of text poked */
 	int tp_len;
 };
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
index a65e9e9..df776cd 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/kprobes/core.c
@@ -133,26 +133,6 @@ void synthesize_relcall(void *dest, void *from, void *to)
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(synthesize_relcall);
 
 /*
- * Skip the prefixes of the instruction.
- */
-static kprobe_opcode_t *skip_prefixes(kprobe_opcode_t *insn)
-{
-	insn_attr_t attr;
-
-	attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute((insn_byte_t)*insn);
-	while (inat_is_legacy_prefix(attr)) {
-		insn++;
-		attr = inat_get_opcode_attribute((insn_byte_t)*insn);
-	}
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
-	if (inat_is_rex_prefix(attr))
-		insn++;
-#endif
-	return insn;
-}
-NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(skip_prefixes);
-
-/*
  * Returns non-zero if INSN is boostable.
  * RIP relative instructions are adjusted at copying time in 64 bits mode
  */
@@ -312,25 +292,6 @@ static int can_probe(unsigned long paddr)
 }
 
 /*
- * Returns non-zero if opcode modifies the interrupt flag.
- */
-static int is_IF_modifier(kprobe_opcode_t *insn)
-{
-	/* Skip prefixes */
-	insn = skip_prefixes(insn);
-
-	switch (*insn) {
-	case 0xfa:		/* cli */
-	case 0xfb:		/* sti */
-	case 0xcf:		/* iret/iretd */
-	case 0x9d:		/* popf/popfd */
-		return 1;
-	}
-
-	return 0;
-}
-
-/*
  * Copy an instruction with recovering modified instruction by kprobes
  * and adjust the displacement if the instruction uses the %rip-relative
  * addressing mode. Note that since @real will be the final place of copied
@@ -411,9 +372,9 @@ static int prepare_boost(kprobe_opcode_t *buf, struct kprobe *p,
 		synthesize_reljump(buf + len, p->ainsn.insn + len,
 				   p->addr + insn->length);
 		len += JMP32_INSN_SIZE;
-		p->ainsn.boostable = true;
+		p->ainsn.boostable = 1;
 	} else {
-		p->ainsn.boostable = false;
+		p->ainsn.boostable = 0;
 	}
 
 	return len;
@@ -450,6 +411,67 @@ void free_insn_page(void *page)
 	module_memfree(page);
 }
 
+static void set_resume_flags(struct kprobe *p, struct insn *insn)
+{
+	insn_byte_t opcode = insn->opcode.bytes[0];
+
+	switch (opcode) {
+	case 0xfa:		/* cli */
+	case 0xfb:		/* sti */
+	case 0x9d:		/* popf/popfd */
+		/* Check whether the instruction modifies Interrupt Flag or not */
+		p->ainsn.if_modifier = 1;
+		break;
+	case 0x9c:	/* pushfl */
+		p->ainsn.is_pushf = 1;
+		break;
+	case 0xcf:	/* iret */
+		p->ainsn.if_modifier = 1;
+		fallthrough;
+	case 0xc2:	/* ret/lret */
+	case 0xc3:
+	case 0xca:
+	case 0xcb:
+	case 0xea:	/* jmp absolute -- ip is correct */
+		/* ip is already adjusted, no more changes required */
+		p->ainsn.is_abs_ip = 1;
+		/* Without resume jump, this is boostable */
+		p->ainsn.boostable = 1;
+		break;
+	case 0xe8:	/* call relative - Fix return addr */
+		p->ainsn.is_call = 1;
+		break;
+#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
+	case 0x9a:	/* call absolute -- same as call absolute, indirect */
+		p->ainsn.is_call = 1;
+		p->ainsn.is_abs_ip = 1;
+		break;
+#endif
+	case 0xff:
+		opcode = insn->opcode.bytes[1];
+		if ((opcode & 0x30) == 0x10) {
+			/*
+			 * call absolute, indirect
+			 * Fix return addr; ip is correct.
+			 * But this is not boostable
+			 */
+			p->ainsn.is_call = 1;
+			p->ainsn.is_abs_ip = 1;
+			break;
+		} else if (((opcode & 0x31) == 0x20) ||
+			   ((opcode & 0x31) == 0x21)) {
+			/*
+			 * jmp near and far, absolute indirect
+			 * ip is correct.
+			 */
+			p->ainsn.is_abs_ip = 1;
+			/* Without resume jump, this is boostable */
+			p->ainsn.boostable = 1;
+		}
+		break;
+	}
+}
+
 static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 {
 	struct insn insn;
@@ -467,8 +489,8 @@ static int arch_copy_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 	 */
 	len = prepare_boost(buf, p, &insn);
 
-	/* Check whether the instruction modifies Interrupt Flag or not */
-	p->ainsn.if_modifier = is_IF_modifier(buf);
+	/* Analyze the opcode and set resume flags */
+	set_resume_flags(p, &insn);
 
 	/* Also, displacement change doesn't affect the first byte */
 	p->opcode = buf[0];
@@ -491,6 +513,9 @@ int arch_prepare_kprobe(struct kprobe *p)
 
 	if (!can_probe((unsigned long)p->addr))
 		return -EILSEQ;
+
+	memset(&p->ainsn, 0, sizeof(p->ainsn));
+
 	/* insn: must be on special executable page on x86. */
 	p->ainsn.insn = get_insn_slot();
 	if (!p->ainsn.insn)
@@ -806,11 +831,6 @@ NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(trampoline_handler);
  * 2) If the single-stepped instruction was a call, the return address
  * that is atop the stack is the address following the copied instruction.
  * We need to make it the address following the original instruction.
- *
- * If this is the first time we've single-stepped the instruction at
- * this probepoint, and the instruction is boostable, boost it: add a
- * jump instruction after the copied instruction, that jumps to the next
- * instruction after the probepoint.
  */
 static void resume_execution(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 			     struct kprobe_ctlblk *kcb)
@@ -818,60 +838,20 @@ static void resume_execution(struct kprobe *p, struct pt_regs *regs,
 	unsigned long *tos = stack_addr(regs);
 	unsigned long copy_ip = (unsigned long)p->ainsn.insn;
 	unsigned long orig_ip = (unsigned long)p->addr;
-	kprobe_opcode_t *insn = p->ainsn.insn;
-
-	/* Skip prefixes */
-	insn = skip_prefixes(insn);
 
 	regs->flags &= ~X86_EFLAGS_TF;
-	switch (*insn) {
-	case 0x9c:	/* pushfl */
+
+	/* Fixup the contents of top of stack */
+	if (p->ainsn.is_pushf) {
 		*tos &= ~(X86_EFLAGS_TF | X86_EFLAGS_IF);
 		*tos |= kcb->kprobe_old_flags;
-		break;
-	case 0xc2:	/* iret/ret/lret */
-	case 0xc3:
-	case 0xca:
-	case 0xcb:
-	case 0xcf:
-	case 0xea:	/* jmp absolute -- ip is correct */
-		/* ip is already adjusted, no more changes required */
-		p->ainsn.boostable = true;
-		goto no_change;
-	case 0xe8:	/* call relative - Fix return addr */
+	} else if (p->ainsn.is_call) {
 		*tos = orig_ip + (*tos - copy_ip);
-		break;
-#ifdef CONFIG_X86_32
-	case 0x9a:	/* call absolute -- same as call absolute, indirect */
-		*tos = orig_ip + (*tos - copy_ip);
-		goto no_change;
-#endif
-	case 0xff:
-		if ((insn[1] & 0x30) == 0x10) {
-			/*
-			 * call absolute, indirect
-			 * Fix return addr; ip is correct.
-			 * But this is not boostable
-			 */
-			*tos = orig_ip + (*tos - copy_ip);
-			goto no_change;
-		} else if (((insn[1] & 0x31) == 0x20) ||
-			   ((insn[1] & 0x31) == 0x21)) {
-			/*
-			 * jmp near and far, absolute indirect
-			 * ip is correct. And this is boostable
-			 */
-			p->ainsn.boostable = true;
-			goto no_change;
-		}
-		break;
-	default:
-		break;
 	}
 
-	regs->ip += orig_ip - copy_ip;
+	if (!p->ainsn.is_abs_ip)
+		regs->ip += orig_ip - copy_ip;
 
-no_change:
 	restore_btf();
 }
 NOKPROBE_SYMBOL(resume_execution);

      parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-05 14:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-12-06 14:11 [PATCH 0/1] x86/kprobes: Classify opcode while preparing kprobe Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-06 14:11 ` [PATCH 1/1] x86/kprobes: Do not decode opcode in resume_execution() Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-07 20:28   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-12-18  1:02   ` [x86/kprobes] 413d31338f: kernel_BUG_at_mm/vmalloc.c kernel test robot
2020-12-18 12:44     ` Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-18 14:12       ` [PATCH -tip v2] x86/kprobes: Do not decode opcode in resume_execution() Masami Hiramatsu
2020-12-31 16:09         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-04  3:45           ` Masami Hiramatsu
2021-01-04 18:40             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-01-05 14:47         ` tip-bot2 for Masami Hiramatsu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=160985807183.414.394791965475735165.tip-bot2@tip-bot2 \
    --to=tip-bot2@linutronix.de \
    --cc=bp@suse.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-tip-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).