From: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>,
peterx@redhat.com, Jerome Glisse <jglisse@redhat.com>,
"Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill@shutemov.name>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@google.com>,
Axel Rasmussen <axelrasmussen@google.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>,
Nadav Amit <nadav.amit@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH RFC 13/30] shmem/userfaultfd: Persist uffd-wp bit across zapping for file-backed
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 12:08:50 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210115170907.24498-14-peterx@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210115170907.24498-1-peterx@redhat.com>
File-backed memory is prone to being unmapped at any time. It means all
information in the pte will be dropped, including the uffd-wp flag.
Since the uffd-wp info cannot be stored in page cache or swap cache, persist
this wr-protect information by installing the special uffd-wp marker pte when
we're going to unmap a uffd wr-protected pte. When the pte is accessed again,
we will know it's previously wr-protected by recognizing the special pte.
Meanwhile add a new flag ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP when we don't want to
persist such an information. For example, when destroying the whole vma, or
punching a hole in a shmem file. For the latter, we can only drop the uffd-wp
bit when holding the page lock. It means the unmap_mapping_range() in
shmem_fallocate() still reuqires to zap without ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP
because that's still racy with the page faults.
Signed-off-by: Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>
---
include/linux/mm.h | 11 ++++++++++
include/linux/mm_inline.h | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
mm/memory.c | 42 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-
mm/rmap.c | 8 ++++++++
mm/truncate.c | 8 +++++++-
5 files changed, 110 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
index 57bb3d680844..e4aba745be62 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm.h
@@ -1634,6 +1634,8 @@ extern void user_shm_unlock(size_t, struct user_struct *);
#define ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING BIT(0)
/* Whether to skip zapping swap entries */
#define ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP BIT(1)
+/* Whether to completely drop uffd-wp entries for file-backed memory */
+#define ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP BIT(2)
/*
* Parameter block passed down to zap_pte_range in exceptional cases.
@@ -1666,6 +1668,15 @@ zap_skip_swap(struct zap_details *details)
return details->zap_flags & ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP;
}
+static inline bool
+zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(struct zap_details *details)
+{
+ if (!details)
+ return false;
+
+ return details->zap_flags & ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP;
+}
+
struct page *vm_normal_page(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
pte_t pte);
struct page *vm_normal_page_pmd(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
diff --git a/include/linux/mm_inline.h b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
index 8fc71e9d7bb0..da4c710859e6 100644
--- a/include/linux/mm_inline.h
+++ b/include/linux/mm_inline.h
@@ -4,6 +4,8 @@
#include <linux/huge_mm.h>
#include <linux/swap.h>
+#include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
+#include <linux/swapops.h>
/**
* page_is_file_lru - should the page be on a file LRU or anon LRU?
@@ -125,4 +127,45 @@ static __always_inline enum lru_list page_lru(struct page *page)
}
return lru;
}
+
+/*
+ * If this pte is wr-protected by uffd-wp in any form, arm the special pte to
+ * replace a none pte. NOTE! This should only be called when *pte is already
+ * cleared so we will never accidentally replace something valuable. Meanwhile
+ * none pte also means we are not demoting the pte so if tlb flushed then we
+ * don't need to do it again; otherwise if tlb flush is postponed then it's
+ * even better.
+ *
+ * Must be called with pgtable lock held.
+ */
+static inline void
+pte_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long addr,
+ pte_t *pte, pte_t pteval)
+{
+#ifdef CONFIG_USERFAULTFD
+ bool arm_uffd_pte = false;
+
+ /* The current status of the pte should be "cleared" before calling */
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_none(*pte));
+
+ if (vma_is_anonymous(vma))
+ return;
+
+ /* A uffd-wp wr-protected normal pte */
+ if (unlikely(pte_present(pteval) && pte_uffd_wp(pteval)))
+ arm_uffd_pte = true;
+
+ /*
+ * A uffd-wp wr-protected swap pte. Note: this should even work for
+ * pte_swp_uffd_wp_special() too.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(is_swap_pte(pteval) && pte_swp_uffd_wp(pteval)))
+ arm_uffd_pte = true;
+
+ if (unlikely(arm_uffd_pte))
+ set_pte_at(vma->vm_mm, addr, pte,
+ pte_swp_mkuffd_wp_special(vma));
+#endif
+}
+
#endif
diff --git a/mm/memory.c b/mm/memory.c
index afe09fccdee1..f87b5a8a098e 100644
--- a/mm/memory.c
+++ b/mm/memory.c
@@ -73,6 +73,7 @@
#include <linux/perf_event.h>
#include <linux/ptrace.h>
#include <linux/vmalloc.h>
+#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
#include <trace/events/kmem.h>
@@ -1194,6 +1195,21 @@ copy_page_range(struct vm_area_struct *dst_vma, struct vm_area_struct *src_vma)
return ret;
}
+/*
+ * This function makes sure that we'll replace the none pte with an uffd-wp
+ * swap special pte marker when necessary. Must be with the pgtable lock held.
+ */
+static inline void
+zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(struct vm_area_struct *vma,
+ unsigned long addr, pte_t *pte,
+ struct zap_details *details, pte_t pteval)
+{
+ if (zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(details))
+ return;
+
+ pte_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, pteval);
+}
+
static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
struct vm_area_struct *vma, pmd_t *pmd,
unsigned long addr, unsigned long end,
@@ -1231,6 +1247,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
ptent = ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte,
tlb->fullmm);
tlb_remove_tlb_entry(tlb, pte, addr);
+ zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, details,
+ ptent);
if (unlikely(!page))
continue;
@@ -1255,6 +1273,22 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
continue;
}
+ /*
+ * If this is a special uffd-wp marker pte... Drop it only if
+ * enforced to do so.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(is_swap_special_pte(ptent))) {
+ WARN_ON_ONCE(!pte_swp_uffd_wp_special(ptent));
+ /*
+ * If this is a common unmap of ptes, keep this as is.
+ * Drop it only if this is a whole-vma destruction.
+ */
+ if (zap_drop_file_uffd_wp(details))
+ ptep_get_and_clear_full(mm, addr, pte,
+ tlb->fullmm);
+ continue;
+ }
+
entry = pte_to_swp_entry(ptent);
if (is_device_private_entry(entry)) {
struct page *page = device_private_entry_to_page(entry);
@@ -1265,6 +1299,8 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
rss[mm_counter(page)]--;
page_remove_rmap(page, false);
put_page(page);
+ zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, details,
+ ptent);
continue;
}
@@ -1282,6 +1318,7 @@ static unsigned long zap_pte_range(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
if (unlikely(!free_swap_and_cache(entry)))
print_bad_pte(vma, addr, ptent, NULL);
pte_clear_not_present_full(mm, addr, pte, tlb->fullmm);
+ zap_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, addr, pte, details, ptent);
} while (pte++, addr += PAGE_SIZE, addr != end);
add_mm_rss_vec(mm, rss);
@@ -1481,12 +1518,15 @@ void unmap_vmas(struct mmu_gather *tlb,
unsigned long end_addr)
{
struct mmu_notifier_range range;
+ struct zap_details details = {
+ .zap_flags = ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP,
+ };
mmu_notifier_range_init(&range, MMU_NOTIFY_UNMAP, 0, vma, vma->vm_mm,
start_addr, end_addr);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_start(&range);
for ( ; vma && vma->vm_start < end_addr; vma = vma->vm_next)
- unmap_single_vma(tlb, vma, start_addr, end_addr, NULL);
+ unmap_single_vma(tlb, vma, start_addr, end_addr, &details);
mmu_notifier_invalidate_range_end(&range);
}
diff --git a/mm/rmap.c b/mm/rmap.c
index 31b29321adfe..f6cc0b9b1963 100644
--- a/mm/rmap.c
+++ b/mm/rmap.c
@@ -72,6 +72,7 @@
#include <linux/page_idle.h>
#include <linux/memremap.h>
#include <linux/userfaultfd_k.h>
+#include <linux/mm_inline.h>
#include <asm/tlbflush.h>
@@ -1560,6 +1561,13 @@ static bool try_to_unmap_one(struct page *page, struct vm_area_struct *vma,
pteval = ptep_clear_flush(vma, address, pvmw.pte);
}
+ /*
+ * Now the pte is cleared. If this is uffd-wp armed pte, we
+ * may want to replace a none pte with a marker pte if it's
+ * file-backed, so we don't lose the tracking information.
+ */
+ pte_install_uffd_wp_if_needed(vma, address, pvmw.pte, pteval);
+
/* Move the dirty bit to the page. Now the pte is gone. */
if (pte_dirty(pteval))
set_page_dirty(page);
diff --git a/mm/truncate.c b/mm/truncate.c
index dac66749e400..35df3b1d301e 100644
--- a/mm/truncate.c
+++ b/mm/truncate.c
@@ -179,7 +179,13 @@ truncate_cleanup_page(struct address_space *mapping, struct page *page)
if (page_mapped(page)) {
unsigned int nr = thp_nr_pages(page);
unmap_mapping_pages(mapping, page->index, nr,
- ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING);
+ ZAP_FLAG_CHECK_MAPPING |
+ /*
+ * Now it's safe to drop uffd-wp because
+ * we're with page lock, and the page is
+ * being truncated.
+ */
+ ZAP_FLAG_DROP_FILE_UFFD_WP);
}
if (page_has_private(page))
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-01-15 17:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-01-15 17:08 [PATCH RFC 00/30] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 01/30] mm/thp: Simplify copying of huge zero page pmd when fork Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 02/30] mm/userfaultfd: Fix uffd-wp special cases for fork() Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 03/30] mm/userfaultfd: Fix a few thp pmd missing uffd-wp bit Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 04/30] shmem/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 05/30] mm: Clear vmf->pte after pte_unmap_same() returns Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 06/30] mm/userfaultfd: Introduce special pte for unmapped file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 07/30] mm/swap: Introduce the idea of special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-01-18 19:40 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2021-01-19 14:24 ` Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 08/30] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in page fault handler Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 09/30] mm: Drop first_index/last_index in zap_details Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 10/30] mm: Introduce zap_details.zap_flags Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 11/30] mm: Introduce ZAP_FLAG_SKIP_SWAP Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 12/30] mm: Pass zap_flags into unmap_mapping_pages() Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` Peter Xu [this message]
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 14/30] shmem/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none pte for file-backed mem Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 15/30] shmem/userfaultfd: Allows file-back mem to be uffd wr-protected on thps Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 16/30] shmem/userfaultfd: Handle the left-overed special swap ptes Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 17/30] shmem/userfaultfd: Pass over uffd-wp special swap pte when fork() Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 18/30] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Hook page faults for uffd write protection Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 19/30] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Take care of UFFDIO_COPY_MODE_WP Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 20/30] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle UFFDIO_WRITEPROTECT Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 21/30] hugetlb: Pass vma into huge_pte_alloc() Peter Xu
2021-01-28 22:59 ` Axel Rasmussen
2021-01-29 22:31 ` Peter Xu
2021-01-30 8:08 ` Axel Rasmussen
2021-01-15 17:08 ` [PATCH RFC 22/30] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Forbid huge pmd sharing when uffd enabled Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:09 ` [PATCH RFC 23/30] mm/hugetlb: Introduce huge version of special swap pte helpers Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:09 ` [PATCH RFC 24/30] mm/hugetlb: Move flush_hugetlb_tlb_range() into hugetlb.h Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:09 ` [PATCH RFC 25/30] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Unshare all pmds for hugetlbfs when register wp Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:09 ` [PATCH RFC 26/30] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Handle uffd-wp special pte in hugetlb pf handler Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:09 ` [PATCH RFC 27/30] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Allow wr-protect none ptes Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:09 ` [PATCH RFC 28/30] hugetlb/userfaultfd: Only drop uffd-wp special pte if required Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:09 ` [PATCH RFC 29/30] userfaultfd: Enable write protection for shmem & hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-01-15 17:12 ` [PATCH RFC 30/30] userfaultfd/selftests: Enable uffd-wp for shmem/hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-01-29 22:49 ` [PATCH RFC 00/30] userfaultfd-wp: Support shmem and hugetlbfs Peter Xu
2021-02-05 21:53 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-02-06 2:36 ` Peter Xu
2021-02-09 19:29 ` Mike Kravetz
2021-02-09 22:00 ` Peter Xu
2021-02-05 22:21 ` Hugh Dickins
2021-02-06 2:47 ` Peter Xu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210115170907.24498-14-peterx@redhat.com \
--to=peterx@redhat.com \
--cc=aarcange@redhat.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=axelrasmussen@google.com \
--cc=hughd@google.com \
--cc=jglisse@redhat.com \
--cc=kirill@shutemov.name \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mike.kravetz@oracle.com \
--cc=nadav.amit@gmail.com \
--cc=rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).