linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>,
	Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>,
	Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>,
	kernel-team@android.com, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v3] gpiolib: Bind gpio_device to a driver to enable fw_devlink=on by default
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 17:12:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210120011244.335025-1-saravanak@google.com> (raw)

There are multiple instances of GPIO device tree nodes of the form:

foo {
	compatible = "acme,foo";
	...

	gpio0: gpio0@xxxxxxxx {
		compatible = "acme,bar";
		...
		gpio-controller;
	};

	gpio1: gpio1@xxxxxxxx {
		compatible = "acme,bar";
		...
		gpio-controller;
	};

	...
}

bazz {
	my-gpios = <&gpio0 ...>;
}

Case 1: The driver for "foo" populates struct device for these gpio*
nodes and then probes them using a driver that binds with "acme,bar".
This lines up with how DT nodes with the "compatible" property are
generally converted to struct devices and then registered with driver
core to probe them. This also allows the gpio* devices to hook into all
the driver core capabilities like runtime PM, probe deferral,
suspend/resume ordering, device links, etc.

Case 2: The driver for "foo" doesn't populate its child device nodes
with "compatible" property and instead just loops through its child
nodes and directly registers the GPIOs with gpiolib without ever
populating a struct device or binding a driver to it.

Drivers that follow the case 2 cause problems with fw_devlink=on.  This
is because fw_devlink will prevent bazz from probing until there's a
struct device that has gpio0 as its fwnode (because bazz lists gpio0 as
a GPIO supplier). Once the struct device is available, fw_devlink will
create a device link between with gpio0 as the supplier and bazz as the
consumer. After this point, the device link will prevent bazz from
probing until its supplier (the gpio0 device) has bound to a driver.
Once the supplier is bound to a driver, the probe of bazz is triggered
automatically.

Finding and refactoring all the instances of drivers that follow case 2
will cause a lot of code churn and it is not something that can be done
in one shot. Examples of such instances are [1] [2].

This patch works around this problem and avoids all the code churn by
simply creating a stub driver to bind to the gpio_device. Since the
gpio_device already points to the GPIO device tree node, this allows all
the consumers to continue probing when the driver follows case 2.

If/when all the old drivers are refactored, we can revert this patch.

[1] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201014191235.7f71fcb4@xhacker.debian/
[2] - https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/e28e1f38d87c12a3c714a6573beba6e1@kernel.org/
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Jisheng Zhang <Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com>
Cc: Kever Yang <kever.yang@rock-chips.com>
Fixes: e590474768f1 ("driver core: Set fw_devlink=on by default")
Signed-off-by: Saravana Kannan <saravanak@google.com>
---
 drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)

diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
index b02cc2abd3b6..2cb88b7ca42b 100644
--- a/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
+++ b/drivers/gpio/gpiolib.c
@@ -574,6 +574,9 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 	unsigned	i;
 	int		base = gc->base;
 	struct gpio_device *gdev;
+	struct device_node *of_node;
+	struct fwnode_handle *fwnode;
+	struct device *fwnode_dev;
 
 	/*
 	 * First: allocate and populate the internal stat container, and
@@ -596,6 +599,22 @@ int gpiochip_add_data_with_key(struct gpio_chip *gc, void *data,
 		gdev->dev.of_node = gc->of_node;
 	else
 		gc->of_node = gdev->dev.of_node;
+
+	of_node = gdev->dev.of_node;
+	fwnode = of_fwnode_handle(of_node);
+	fwnode_dev = get_dev_from_fwnode(fwnode);
+	/*
+	 * If your driver hits this warning, it's because you are directly
+	 * parsing a device tree node with "compatible" property and
+	 * initializing it instead of using the standard DT + device driver
+	 * model of creating a struct device and then initializing it in the
+	 * probe function. Please refactor your driver.
+	 */
+	if (!fwnode_dev && of_find_property(of_node, "compatible", NULL)) {
+		pr_warn("Create a real device for %pOF\n", of_node);
+		gdev->dev.fwnode = fwnode;
+	}
+	put_device(fwnode_dev);
 #endif
 
 	gdev->id = ida_alloc(&gpio_ida, GFP_KERNEL);
@@ -4202,6 +4221,17 @@ void gpiod_put_array(struct gpio_descs *descs)
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(gpiod_put_array);
 
+static int gpio_stub_drv_probe(struct device *dev)
+{
+	return 0;
+}
+
+static struct device_driver gpio_stub_drv = {
+	.name = "gpio_stub_drv",
+	.bus = &gpio_bus_type,
+	.probe = gpio_stub_drv_probe,
+};
+
 static int __init gpiolib_dev_init(void)
 {
 	int ret;
@@ -4213,9 +4243,16 @@ static int __init gpiolib_dev_init(void)
 		return ret;
 	}
 
+	if (driver_register(&gpio_stub_drv) < 0) {
+		pr_err("gpiolib: could not register GPIO stub driver\n");
+		bus_unregister(&gpio_bus_type);
+		return ret;
+	}
+
 	ret = alloc_chrdev_region(&gpio_devt, 0, GPIO_DEV_MAX, GPIOCHIP_NAME);
 	if (ret < 0) {
 		pr_err("gpiolib: failed to allocate char dev region\n");
+		driver_unregister(&gpio_stub_drv);
 		bus_unregister(&gpio_bus_type);
 		return ret;
 	}
-- 
2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog


                 reply	other threads:[~2021-01-20  1:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210120011244.335025-1-saravanak@google.com \
    --to=saravanak@google.com \
    --cc=Jisheng.Zhang@synaptics.com \
    --cc=bgolaszewski@baylibre.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@android.com \
    --cc=kever.yang@rock-chips.com \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).