linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jirislaby@kernel.org, linux-serial@vger.kernel.org
Cc: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org, hch@lst.de, viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ohw.giles@gmail.com,
	r.karszniewicz@phytec.de,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3/6] tty: implement read_iter
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2021 10:00:17 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210121090020.3147058-3-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210121090020.3147058-1-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Now that the ldisc read() function takes kernel pointers, it's fairly
straightforward to make the tty file operations use .read_iter() instead
of .read().

That automatically gives us vread() and friends, and also makes it
possible to do .splice_read() on ttys again.

Fixes: 36e2c7421f02 ("fs: don't allow splice read/write without explicit ops")
Reported-by: Oliver Giles <ohw.giles@gmail.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
---
 drivers/tty/tty_io.c | 36 ++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
index a34f8bcf875e..8846d3b99845 100644
--- a/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
+++ b/drivers/tty/tty_io.c
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ LIST_HEAD(tty_drivers);			/* linked list of tty drivers */
 /* Mutex to protect creating and releasing a tty */
 DEFINE_MUTEX(tty_mutex);
 
-static ssize_t tty_read(struct file *, char __user *, size_t, loff_t *);
+static ssize_t tty_read(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *);
 static ssize_t tty_write(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *);
 ssize_t redirected_tty_write(struct kiocb *, struct iov_iter *);
 static __poll_t tty_poll(struct file *, poll_table *);
@@ -476,8 +476,9 @@ static void tty_show_fdinfo(struct seq_file *m, struct file *file)
 
 static const struct file_operations tty_fops = {
 	.llseek		= no_llseek,
-	.read		= tty_read,
+	.read_iter	= tty_read,
 	.write_iter	= tty_write,
+	.splice_read	= generic_file_splice_read,
 	.splice_write	= iter_file_splice_write,
 	.poll		= tty_poll,
 	.unlocked_ioctl	= tty_ioctl,
@@ -490,8 +491,9 @@ static const struct file_operations tty_fops = {
 
 static const struct file_operations console_fops = {
 	.llseek		= no_llseek,
-	.read		= tty_read,
+	.read_iter	= tty_read,
 	.write_iter	= redirected_tty_write,
+	.splice_read	= generic_file_splice_read,
 	.splice_write	= iter_file_splice_write,
 	.poll		= tty_poll,
 	.unlocked_ioctl	= tty_ioctl,
@@ -844,16 +846,17 @@ static void tty_update_time(struct timespec64 *time)
  * data or clears the cookie. The cookie may be something that the
  * ldisc maintains state for and needs to free.
  */
-static int iterate_tty_read(struct tty_ldisc *ld, struct tty_struct *tty, struct file *file,
-		char __user *buf, size_t count)
+static int iterate_tty_read(struct tty_ldisc *ld, struct tty_struct *tty,
+		struct file *file, struct iov_iter *to)
 {
 	int retval = 0;
 	void *cookie = NULL;
 	unsigned long offset = 0;
 	char kernel_buf[64];
+	size_t count = iov_iter_count(to);
 
 	do {
-		int size, uncopied;
+		int size, copied;
 
 		size = count > sizeof(kernel_buf) ? sizeof(kernel_buf) : count;
 		size = ld->ops->read(tty, file, kernel_buf, size, &cookie, offset);
@@ -869,10 +872,9 @@ static int iterate_tty_read(struct tty_ldisc *ld, struct tty_struct *tty, struct
 			return size;
 		}
 
-		uncopied = copy_to_user(buf+offset, kernel_buf, size);
-		size -= uncopied;
-		offset += size;
-		count -= size;
+		copied = copy_to_iter(kernel_buf, size, to);
+		offset += copied;
+		count -= copied;
 
 		/*
 		 * If the user copy failed, we still need to do another ->read()
@@ -880,7 +882,7 @@ static int iterate_tty_read(struct tty_ldisc *ld, struct tty_struct *tty, struct
 		 *
 		 * But make sure size is zeroed.
 		 */
-		if (unlikely(uncopied)) {
+		if (unlikely(copied != size)) {
 			count = 0;
 			retval = -EFAULT;
 		}
@@ -907,10 +909,10 @@ static int iterate_tty_read(struct tty_ldisc *ld, struct tty_struct *tty, struct
  *	read calls may be outstanding in parallel.
  */
 
-static ssize_t tty_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
-			loff_t *ppos)
+static ssize_t tty_read(struct kiocb *iocb, struct iov_iter *to)
 {
 	int i;
+	struct file *file = iocb->ki_filp;
 	struct inode *inode = file_inode(file);
 	struct tty_struct *tty = file_tty(file);
 	struct tty_ldisc *ld;
@@ -923,11 +925,9 @@ static ssize_t tty_read(struct file *file, char __user *buf, size_t count,
 	/* We want to wait for the line discipline to sort out in this
 	   situation */
 	ld = tty_ldisc_ref_wait(tty);
-	if (!ld)
-		return hung_up_tty_read(file, buf, count, ppos);
 	i = -EIO;
-	if (ld->ops->read)
-		i = iterate_tty_read(ld, tty, file, buf, count);
+	if (ld && ld->ops->read)
+		i = iterate_tty_read(ld, tty, file, to);
 	tty_ldisc_deref(ld);
 
 	if (i > 0)
@@ -2927,7 +2927,7 @@ static long tty_compat_ioctl(struct file *file, unsigned int cmd,
 
 static int this_tty(const void *t, struct file *file, unsigned fd)
 {
-	if (likely(file->f_op->read != tty_read))
+	if (likely(file->f_op->read_iter != tty_read))
 		return 0;
 	return file_tty(file) != t ? 0 : fd + 1;
 }
-- 
2.30.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-21  9:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-21  9:00 [PATCH 1/6] tty: implement write_iter Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21  9:00 ` [PATCH 2/6] tty: convert tty_ldisc_ops 'read()' function to take a kernel pointer Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21 11:02   ` Jiri Slaby
2021-01-21 17:46     ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-21 17:57       ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21  9:00 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-01-21 10:44   ` [PATCH 3/6] tty: implement read_iter Jiri Slaby
2021-01-21  9:00 ` [PATCH 4/6] tty: clean up legacy leftovers from n_tty line discipline Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21  9:00 ` [PATCH 5/6] tty: teach n_tty line discipline about the new "cookie continuations" Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21  9:00 ` [PATCH 6/6] tty: teach the n_tty ICANON case about the new "cookie continuations" too Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21  9:39 ` [PATCH 1/6] tty: implement write_iter Jiri Slaby
2021-01-21 17:44   ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-21 17:57     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21 18:42       ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-21 19:43         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-01-21 21:09           ` Linus Torvalds
2021-01-22  7:07             ` Jiri Slaby
2021-01-22  7:33         ` Jiri Slaby
2021-01-22  7:43           ` Greg Kroah-Hartman

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210121090020.3147058-3-gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ohw.giles@gmail.com \
    --cc=r.karszniewicz@phytec.de \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).