linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
To: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Jia Cheng Hu <jia.jiachenghu@gmail.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
	Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
Subject: [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 2/6] block, bfq: set next_rq to waker_bfqq->next_rq in waker injection
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2021 19:19:44 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210122181948.35660-3-paolo.valente@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210122181948.35660-1-paolo.valente@linaro.org>

From: Jia Cheng Hu <jia.jiachenghu@gmail.com>

Since commit c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and
unconditionally inject their I/O"), when the in-service bfq_queue, say
Q, is temporarily empty, BFQ checks whether there are I/O requests to
inject (also) from the waker bfq_queue for Q. To this goal, the value
pointed by bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq must be controlled. However, the
current implementation mistakenly looks at bfqq->next_rq, which
instead points to the next request of the currently served queue.

This mistake evidently causes losses of throughput in scenarios with
waker bfq_queues.

This commit corrects this mistake.

Fixes: c5089591c3ba ("block, bfq: detect wakers and unconditionally inject their I/O")
Signed-off-by: Jia Cheng Hu <jia.jiachenghu@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: Paolo Valente <paolo.valente@linaro.org>
---
 block/bfq-iosched.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/block/bfq-iosched.c b/block/bfq-iosched.c
index eb2ca32d5b63..fdc5e163b2fe 100644
--- a/block/bfq-iosched.c
+++ b/block/bfq-iosched.c
@@ -4499,7 +4499,7 @@ static struct bfq_queue *bfq_select_queue(struct bfq_data *bfqd)
 			bfqq = bfqq->bic->bfqq[0];
 		else if (bfq_bfqq_has_waker(bfqq) &&
 			   bfq_bfqq_busy(bfqq->waker_bfqq) &&
-			   bfqq->next_rq &&
+			   bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq &&
 			   bfq_serv_to_charge(bfqq->waker_bfqq->next_rq,
 					      bfqq->waker_bfqq) <=
 			   bfq_bfqq_budget_left(bfqq->waker_bfqq)
-- 
2.20.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-01-22 19:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-22 18:19 [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 0/6] block, bfq: first bath of fixes and improvements Paolo Valente
2021-01-22 18:19 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 1/6] block, bfq: use half slice_idle as a threshold to check short ttime Paolo Valente
2021-01-22 18:19 ` Paolo Valente [this message]
2021-01-22 18:19 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 3/6] block, bfq: increase time window for waker detection Paolo Valente
2021-01-22 18:19 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 4/6] block, bfq: do not raise non-default weights Paolo Valente
2021-01-22 18:19 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 5/6] block, bfq: avoid spurious switches to soft_rt of interactive queues Paolo Valente
2021-01-22 18:19 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 6/6] block, bfq: do not expire a queue when it is the only busy one Paolo Valente
2021-01-22 18:22 ` [PATCH BUGFIX/IMPROVEMENT 0/6] block, bfq: first bath of fixes and improvements Paolo Valente
2021-01-25  1:18 ` Jens Axboe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210122181948.35660-3-paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --to=paolo.valente@linaro.org \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=jia.jiachenghu@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).