linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: x86@kernel.org, Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Subject: [patch 02/12] x86/irq: Sanitize irq stack tracking
Date: Thu, 04 Feb 2021 21:49:05 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210204211154.257738890@linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 20210204204903.350275743@linutronix.de

The recursion protection for hard interrupt stacks is an unsigned int per
CPU variable initialized to -1 named __irq_count. 

The irq stack switching is only done when the variable is -1, which creates
worse code than just checking for 0. When the stack switching happens it
uses this_cpu_add/sub(1), but there is no reason to do so. It simply can
use straight writes. This is a historical leftover from the low level ASM
code which used inc and jz to make a decision.

Rename it to hardirq_stack_inuse, make it a bool and use plain stores.

Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
---
 arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h |   14 +++++++-------
 arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c     |    2 +-
 arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c     |    2 +-
 4 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/irq_stack.h
@@ -9,7 +9,7 @@
 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
 static __always_inline bool irqstack_active(void)
 {
-	return __this_cpu_read(irq_count) != -1;
+	return __this_cpu_read(hardirq_stack_inuse);
 }
 
 void asm_call_on_stack(void *sp, void (*func)(void), void *arg);
@@ -22,9 +22,9 @@ static __always_inline void __run_on_irq
 {
 	void *tos = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_stack_ptr);
 
-	__this_cpu_add(irq_count, 1);
+	__this_cpu_write(hardirq_stack_inuse, true);
 	asm_call_on_stack(tos - 8, func, NULL);
-	__this_cpu_sub(irq_count, 1);
+	__this_cpu_write(hardirq_stack_inuse, false);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void
@@ -33,9 +33,9 @@ static __always_inline void
 {
 	void *tos = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_stack_ptr);
 
-	__this_cpu_add(irq_count, 1);
+	__this_cpu_write(hardirq_stack_inuse, true);
 	asm_call_sysvec_on_stack(tos - 8, func, regs);
-	__this_cpu_sub(irq_count, 1);
+	__this_cpu_write(hardirq_stack_inuse, false);
 }
 
 static __always_inline void
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @@ static __always_inline void
 {
 	void *tos = __this_cpu_read(hardirq_stack_ptr);
 
-	__this_cpu_add(irq_count, 1);
+	__this_cpu_write(hardirq_stack_inuse, true);
 	asm_call_irq_on_stack(tos - 8, func, desc);
-	__this_cpu_sub(irq_count, 1);
+	__this_cpu_write(hardirq_stack_inuse, false);
 }
 
 #else /* CONFIG_X86_64 */
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@ static inline unsigned long cpu_kernelmo
 	return (unsigned long)per_cpu(fixed_percpu_data.gs_base, cpu);
 }
 
-DECLARE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count);
+DECLARE_PER_CPU(bool, hardirq_stack_inuse);
 extern asmlinkage void ignore_sysret(void);
 
 /* Save actual FS/GS selectors and bases to current->thread */
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c
@@ -1740,7 +1740,7 @@ DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct task_struct *, cur
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(current_task);
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(struct irq_stack *, hardirq_stack_ptr);
-DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned int, irq_count) __visible = -1;
+DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, hardirq_stack_inuse);
 
 DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, __preempt_count) = INIT_PREEMPT_COUNT;
 EXPORT_PER_CPU_SYMBOL(__preempt_count);
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ void compat_start_thread(struct pt_regs
 	int cpu = smp_processor_id();
 
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_DEBUG_ENTRY) &&
-		     this_cpu_read(irq_count) != -1);
+		     this_cpu_read(hardirq_stack_inuse));
 
 	if (!test_thread_flag(TIF_NEED_FPU_LOAD))
 		switch_fpu_prepare(prev_fpu, cpu);


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-02-05  0:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-02-04 20:49 [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 01/12] x86/entry: Fix instrumentation annotation Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 12:02   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 03/12] x86/irq/64: Adjust the per CPU irq stack pointer by 8 Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 13:53   ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-05 15:00     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 04/12] x86/apic: Split out spurious handling code Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 05/12] x86/irq: Provide macro for inlining irq stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 15:06   ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-08 20:42   ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 15:12     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 16:22       ` Josh Poimboeuf
2021-02-09 18:14         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 06/12] x86/entry: Convert system vectors to irq stack macro Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05  3:52   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-05 14:13     ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-02-07  8:15       ` [kbuild-all] " Rong Chen
2021-02-08 14:19         ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-09  8:57           ` Rong Chen
2021-02-09 10:46             ` Borislav Petkov
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 07/12] x86/entry: Convert device interrupts to inline stack switching Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 08/12] x86/entry: Use run_sysvec_on_irqstack_cond() for XEN upcall Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05  7:28   ` kernel test robot
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 09/12] x86/softirq: Remove indirection in do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 10/12] x86: Select CONFIG_HAVE_IRQ_EXIT_ON_IRQ_STACK Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 11/12] softirq: Allow inlining do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-05 10:14   ` Lai Jiangshan
2021-02-05 11:38     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-09 20:43       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-04 20:49 ` [patch 12/12] x86/softirq/64: Inline do_softirq_own_stack() Thomas Gleixner
2021-02-08 21:47 ` [patch 00/12] x86/irq/64: Inline irq stack switching Kees Cook

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210204211154.257738890@linutronix.de \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).