From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: seanjc@google.com
Subject: [PATCH 04/23] KVM: nSVM: rename functions and variables according to vmcbXY nomenclature
Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2021 14:33:24 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210302193343.313318-5-pbonzini@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210302193343.313318-1-pbonzini@redhat.com>
Now that SVM is using a separate vmcb01 and vmcb02 (and also uses the vmcb12
naming) we can give clearer names to functions that write to and read
from those VMCBs. Likewise, variables and parameters can be renamed
from nested_vmcb to vmcb12.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
---
arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 28 ++++++++++++++--------------
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 14 +++++++-------
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 5 ++---
3 files changed, 23 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
index 3bbb4acdf956..4d136465dee1 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c
@@ -274,8 +274,8 @@ static bool nested_vmcb_checks(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12)
return nested_vmcb_check_controls(&vmcb12->control);
}
-static void load_nested_vmcb_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
- struct vmcb_control_area *control)
+static void nested_load_control_from_vmcb12(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
+ struct vmcb_control_area *control)
{
copy_vmcb_control_area(&svm->nested.ctl, control);
@@ -287,9 +287,9 @@ static void load_nested_vmcb_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
/*
* Synchronize fields that are written by the processor, so that
- * they can be copied back into the nested_vmcb.
+ * they can be copied back into the vmcb12.
*/
-void sync_nested_vmcb_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
+void nested_sync_control_from_vmcb02(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
u32 mask;
svm->nested.ctl.event_inj = svm->vmcb->control.event_inj;
@@ -317,8 +317,8 @@ void sync_nested_vmcb_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
* Transfer any event that L0 or L1 wanted to inject into L2 to
* EXIT_INT_INFO.
*/
-static void nested_vmcb_save_pending_event(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
- struct vmcb *vmcb12)
+static void nested_save_pending_event_to_vmcb12(struct vcpu_svm *svm,
+ struct vmcb *vmcb12)
{
struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu = &svm->vcpu;
u32 exit_int_info = 0;
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@ void nested_vmcb02_compute_g_pat(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr->save.g_pat = svm->vmcb01.ptr->save.g_pat;
}
-static void nested_prepare_vmcb_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12)
+static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12)
{
nested_vmcb02_compute_g_pat(svm);
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ static void nested_prepare_vmcb_save(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct vmcb *vmcb12)
svm->vmcb->save.cpl = vmcb12->save.cpl;
}
-static void nested_prepare_vmcb_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
+static void nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
const u32 mask = V_INTR_MASKING_MASK | V_GIF_ENABLE_MASK | V_GIF_MASK;
@@ -486,11 +486,11 @@ int enter_svm_guest_mode(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 vmcb12_gpa,
WARN_ON(svm->vmcb == svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr);
nested_svm_vmloadsave(svm->vmcb01.ptr, svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr);
- load_nested_vmcb_control(svm, &vmcb12->control);
+ nested_load_control_from_vmcb12(svm, &vmcb12->control);
svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->nested.vmcb02);
- nested_prepare_vmcb_control(svm);
- nested_prepare_vmcb_save(svm, vmcb12);
+ nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(svm);
+ nested_vmcb02_prepare_save(svm, vmcb12);
ret = nested_svm_load_cr3(&svm->vcpu, vmcb12->save.cr3,
nested_npt_enabled(svm));
@@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ int nested_svm_vmexit(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
vmcb12->control.exit_info_2 = vmcb->control.exit_info_2;
if (vmcb12->control.exit_code != SVM_EXIT_ERR)
- nested_vmcb_save_pending_event(svm, vmcb12);
+ nested_save_pending_event_to_vmcb12(svm, vmcb12);
if (svm->nrips_enabled)
vmcb12->control.next_rip = vmcb->control.next_rip;
@@ -1225,11 +1225,11 @@ static int svm_set_nested_state(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
if (svm->current_vmcb == &svm->vmcb01)
svm->nested.vmcb02.ptr->save = svm->vmcb01.ptr->save;
svm->vmcb01.ptr->save = *save;
- load_nested_vmcb_control(svm, ctl);
+ nested_load_control_from_vmcb12(svm, ctl);
svm_switch_vmcb(svm, &svm->nested.vmcb02);
- nested_prepare_vmcb_control(svm);
+ nested_vmcb02_prepare_control(svm);
kvm_make_request(KVM_REQ_GET_NESTED_STATE_PAGES, vcpu);
ret = 0;
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
index aa1baf646ff0..e7fcd92551e5 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c
@@ -2122,7 +2122,7 @@ static int vmmcall_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
static int vmload_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
- struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
+ struct vmcb *vmcb12;
struct kvm_host_map map;
int ret;
@@ -2136,11 +2136,11 @@ static int vmload_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
return 1;
}
- nested_vmcb = map.hva;
+ vmcb12 = map.hva;
ret = kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
- nested_svm_vmloadsave(nested_vmcb, svm->vmcb);
+ nested_svm_vmloadsave(vmcb12, svm->vmcb);
kvm_vcpu_unmap(&svm->vcpu, &map, true);
return ret;
@@ -2148,7 +2148,7 @@ static int vmload_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
static int vmsave_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
{
- struct vmcb *nested_vmcb;
+ struct vmcb *vmcb12;
struct kvm_host_map map;
int ret;
@@ -2162,11 +2162,11 @@ static int vmsave_interception(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
return 1;
}
- nested_vmcb = map.hva;
+ vmcb12 = map.hva;
ret = kvm_skip_emulated_instruction(&svm->vcpu);
- nested_svm_vmloadsave(svm->vmcb, nested_vmcb);
+ nested_svm_vmloadsave(svm->vmcb, vmcb12);
kvm_vcpu_unmap(&svm->vcpu, &map, true);
return ret;
@@ -3947,7 +3947,7 @@ static __no_kcsan fastpath_t svm_vcpu_run(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu)
svm->next_rip = 0;
if (is_guest_mode(&svm->vcpu)) {
- sync_nested_vmcb_control(svm);
+ nested_sync_control_from_vmcb02(svm);
svm->nested.nested_run_pending = 0;
}
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
index 993155195212..f6cad4b20d80 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h
@@ -437,8 +437,7 @@ static inline bool nested_exit_on_nmi(struct vcpu_svm *svm)
return vmcb_is_intercept(&svm->nested.ctl, INTERCEPT_NMI);
}
-int enter_svm_guest_mode(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 vmcb_gpa,
- struct vmcb *nested_vmcb);
+int enter_svm_guest_mode(struct vcpu_svm *svm, u64 vmcb_gpa, struct vmcb *vmcb12);
void svm_leave_nested(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
void svm_free_nested(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
int svm_allocate_nested(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
@@ -450,7 +449,7 @@ int nested_svm_check_permissions(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
int nested_svm_check_exception(struct vcpu_svm *svm, unsigned nr,
bool has_error_code, u32 error_code);
int nested_svm_exit_special(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
-void sync_nested_vmcb_control(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
+void nested_sync_control_from_vmcb02(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
void nested_vmcb02_compute_g_pat(struct vcpu_svm *svm);
void svm_switch_vmcb(struct vcpu_svm *svm, struct kvm_vmcb_info *target_vmcb);
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-02 22:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-02 19:33 [PATCH 00/23] SVM queue for 5.13 Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 01/23] KVM: SVM: Use a separate vmcb for the nested L2 guest Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 02/23] KVM: nSVM: Track the physical cpu of the vmcb vmrun through the vmcb Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 03/23] KVM: nSVM: Track the ASID generation " Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` Paolo Bonzini [this message]
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 05/23] KVM: nSVM: do not copy vmcb01->control blindly to vmcb02->control Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 06/23] KVM: nSVM: do not mark all VMCB01 fields dirty on nested vmexit Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 07/23] KVM: nSVM: do not mark all VMCB02 " Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 08/23] KVM: nSVM: only copy L1 non-VMLOAD/VMSAVE data in svm_set_nested_state() Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 09/23] KVM: nSVM: Add missing checks for reserved bits to svm_set_nested_state() Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 10/23] KVM: x86: Move nVMX's consistency check macro to common code Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 11/23] KVM: nSVM: Trace VM-Enter consistency check failures Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 12/23] KVM: SVM: merge update_cr0_intercept into svm_set_cr0 Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 13/23] KVM: SVM: Pass struct kvm_vcpu to exit handlers (and many, many other places) Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 14/23] KVM: nSVM: Add VMLOAD/VMSAVE helper to deduplicate code Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 15/23] KVM: x86: Move XSETBV emulation to common code Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 16/23] KVM: x86: Move trivial instruction-based exit handlers " Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 17/23] KVM: x86: Move RDPMC emulation " Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 18/23] KVM: SVM: Don't manually emulate RDPMC if nrips=0 Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 19/23] KVM: SVM: Skip intercepted PAUSE instructions after emulation Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 20/23] KVM: SVM: move VMLOAD/VMSAVE to C code Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 21/23] KVM: nSVM: always use vmcb01 to for vmsave/vmload of guest state Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 22/23] x86/cpufeatures: Add the Virtual SPEC_CTRL feature Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-02 19:33 ` [PATCH 23/23] KVM: SVM: Add support for Virtual SPEC_CTRL Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210302193343.313318-5-pbonzini@redhat.com \
--to=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).