linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: rcu@vger.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kernel-team@fb.com,
	mingo@kernel.org, jiangshanlai@gmail.com,
	akpm@linux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com,
	josh@joshtriplett.org, tglx@linutronix.de, peterz@infradead.org,
	rostedt@goodmis.org, dhowells@redhat.com, edumazet@google.com,
	fweisbec@gmail.com, oleg@redhat.com, joel@joelfernandes.org,
	"Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 4/6] kvfree_rcu: Replace __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL by __GFP_NORETRY
Date: Wed,  3 Mar 2021 16:11:32 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304001134.22977-4-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304001044.GA22871@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

From: "Uladzislau Rezki (Sony)" <urezki@gmail.com>

__GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL can spend quite a bit of time reclaiming, and this
can be wasted effort given that there is a fallback code path in case
memory allocation fails.

__GFP_NORETRY does perform some light-weight reclaim, but it will fail
under OOM conditions, allowing the fallback to be taken as an alternative
to hard-OOMing the system.

There is a four-way tradeoff that must be balanced:
    1) Minimize use of the fallback path;
    2) Avoid full-up OOM;
    3) Do a light-wait allocation request;
    4) Avoid dipping into the emergency reserves.

Signed-off-by: Uladzislau Rezki (Sony) <urezki@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tree.c | 14 +++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree.c b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
index 7ee83f3..0ecc1fb 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
@@ -3517,8 +3517,20 @@ add_ptr_to_bulk_krc_lock(struct kfree_rcu_cpu **krcp,
 		bnode = get_cached_bnode(*krcp);
 		if (!bnode && can_alloc) {
 			krc_this_cpu_unlock(*krcp, *flags);
+
+			// __GFP_NORETRY - allows a light-weight direct reclaim
+			// what is OK from minimizing of fallback hitting point of
+			// view. Apart of that it forbids any OOM invoking what is
+			// also beneficial since we are about to release memory soon.
+			//
+			// __GFP_NOMEMALLOC - prevents from consuming of all the
+			// memory reserves. Please note we have a fallback path.
+			//
+			// __GFP_NOWARN - it is supposed that an allocation can
+			// be failed under low memory or high memory pressure
+			// scenarios.
 			bnode = (struct kvfree_rcu_bulk_data *)
-				__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_RETRY_MAYFAIL | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
+				__get_free_page(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_NORETRY | __GFP_NOMEMALLOC | __GFP_NOWARN);
 			*krcp = krc_this_cpu_lock(flags);
 		}
 
-- 
2.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  0:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-04  0:10 [PATCH tip/core/rcu 0/6] kvfree_rcu() updates for v5.12-rc1 Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-04  0:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 1/6] kvfree_rcu: Directly allocate page for single-argument case paulmck
2021-03-04  0:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 2/6] kvfree_rcu: Use __GFP_NOMEMALLOC for single-argument kvfree_rcu() paulmck
2021-03-04  0:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 3/6] kvfree_rcu: Make krc_this_cpu_unlock() use raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore() paulmck
2021-03-04  0:11 ` paulmck [this message]
2021-03-04  0:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 5/6] kvfree_rcu: Use same set of GFP flags as does single-argument paulmck
2021-03-04  0:11 ` [PATCH tip/core/rcu 6/6] rcuscale: Add kfree_rcu() single-argument scale test paulmck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210304001134.22977-4-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=oleg@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).