linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: paulmck@kernel.org
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: john.stultz@linaro.org, tglx@linutronix.de, sboyd@kernel.org,
	corbet@lwn.net, Mark.Rutland@arm.com, maz@kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fb.com, neeraju@codeaurora.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH kernel/time 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking
Date: Wed,  3 Mar 2021 16:53:20 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210304005320.25834-5-paulmck@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210304004931.GA25461@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72>

From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>

Although smp_call_function() has the advantage of simplicity, using
it to check for cross-CPU clock desynchronization means that any CPU
being slow reduces the sensitivity of the checking across all CPUs.
And it is not uncommon for smp_call_function() latencies to be in the
hundreds of microseconds.

This commit therefore switches to smp_call_function_single(), so that
delays from a given CPU affect only those measurements involving that
particular CPU.

Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Cc: Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@arm.com>
Cc: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
---
 kernel/time/clocksource.c | 41 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----------------
 1 file changed, 25 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index df48416..4161c84 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog_inject_delay(void)
 }
 
 static struct clocksource *clocksource_verify_work_cs;
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(u64, csnow_mid);
+static u64 csnow_mid;
 static cpumask_t cpus_ahead;
 static cpumask_t cpus_behind;
 
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@ static void clocksource_verify_one_cpu(void *csin)
 		sign = ((smp_processor_id() >> inject_delay_shift_percpu) & 0x1) * 2 - 1;
 		delta = sign * NSEC_PER_SEC;
 	}
-	__this_cpu_write(csnow_mid, cs->read(cs) + delta);
+	csnow_mid = cs->read(cs) + delta;
 }
 
 static void clocksource_verify_percpu_wq(struct work_struct *unused)
@@ -236,9 +236,12 @@ static void clocksource_verify_percpu_wq(struct work_struct *unused)
 	int cpu;
 	struct clocksource *cs;
 	int64_t cs_nsec;
+	int64_t cs_nsec_max;
+	int64_t cs_nsec_min;
 	u64 csnow_begin;
 	u64 csnow_end;
-	u64 delta;
+	s64 delta;
+	bool firsttime = 1;
 
 	cs = smp_load_acquire(&clocksource_verify_work_cs); // pairs with release
 	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!cs))
@@ -247,19 +250,28 @@ static void clocksource_verify_percpu_wq(struct work_struct *unused)
 		cs->name, smp_processor_id());
 	cpumask_clear(&cpus_ahead);
 	cpumask_clear(&cpus_behind);
-	csnow_begin = cs->read(cs);
-	smp_call_function(clocksource_verify_one_cpu, cs, 1);
-	csnow_end = cs->read(cs);
+	preempt_disable();
 	for_each_online_cpu(cpu) {
 		if (cpu == smp_processor_id())
 			continue;
-		delta = (per_cpu(csnow_mid, cpu) - csnow_begin) & cs->mask;
-		if ((s64)delta < 0)
+		csnow_begin = cs->read(cs);
+		smp_call_function_single(cpu, clocksource_verify_one_cpu, cs, 1);
+		csnow_end = cs->read(cs);
+		delta = (s64)((csnow_mid - csnow_begin) & cs->mask);
+		if (delta < 0)
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpus_behind);
-		delta = (csnow_end - per_cpu(csnow_mid, cpu)) & cs->mask;
-		if ((s64)delta < 0)
+		delta = (csnow_end - csnow_mid) & cs->mask;
+		if (delta < 0)
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpus_ahead);
+		delta = clocksource_delta(csnow_end, csnow_begin, cs->mask);
+		cs_nsec = clocksource_cyc2ns(delta, cs->mult, cs->shift);
+		if (firsttime || cs_nsec > cs_nsec_max)
+			cs_nsec_max = cs_nsec;
+		if (firsttime || cs_nsec < cs_nsec_min)
+			cs_nsec_min = cs_nsec;
+		firsttime = 0;
 	}
+	preempt_enable();
 	if (!cpumask_empty(&cpus_ahead))
 		pr_warn("        CPUs %*pbl ahead of CPU %d for clocksource %s.\n",
 			cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_ahead),
@@ -268,12 +280,9 @@ static void clocksource_verify_percpu_wq(struct work_struct *unused)
 		pr_warn("        CPUs %*pbl behind CPU %d for clocksource %s.\n",
 			cpumask_pr_args(&cpus_behind),
 			smp_processor_id(), cs->name);
-	if (!cpumask_empty(&cpus_ahead) || !cpumask_empty(&cpus_behind)) {
-		delta = clocksource_delta(csnow_end, csnow_begin, cs->mask);
-		cs_nsec = clocksource_cyc2ns(delta, cs->mult, cs->shift);
-		pr_warn("        CPU %d duration %lldns for clocksource %s.\n",
-			smp_processor_id(), cs_nsec, cs->name);
-	}
+	if (!firsttime && (!cpumask_empty(&cpus_ahead) || !cpumask_empty(&cpus_behind)))
+		pr_warn("        CPU %d check durations %lldns - %lldns for clocksource %s.\n",
+			smp_processor_id(), cs_nsec_min, cs_nsec_max, cs->name);
 	smp_store_release(&clocksource_verify_work_cs, NULL); // pairs with acquire.
 }
 
-- 
2.9.5


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-04  1:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 72+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-01-06  0:40 [PATCH RFC clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-01-06 16:28   ` Rik van Riel
2021-01-06 19:53     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-06 20:59       ` Rik van Riel
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-01-06  0:41 ` [PATCH RFC clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-01-12  0:42 ` [PATCH v2 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays Paul E. McKenney
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-01-12  0:45   ` [PATCH v2 clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-02-02 17:04   ` [PATCH v3 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-02-02 19:51       ` Randy Dunlap
2021-02-03  0:50         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-03  1:31           ` Randy Dunlap
2021-02-03  1:40             ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-02 17:06     ` [PATCH clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-02-17 21:28     ` [PATCH v3 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays Paul E. McKenney
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-02-17 21:29       ` [PATCH clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-03-04  0:49       ` [PATCH v5 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-03-04  0:53         ` [PATCH kernel/time 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-03-04  0:53         ` paulmck [this message]
2021-04-02 20:29         ` [PATCH v5 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-04-02 22:22             ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-02 22:37               ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 22:48               ` [PATCH v7 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 1/5] clocksource: Provide module parameters to inject delays in watchdog paulmck
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 2/5] clocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-04-10  8:41                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-10 23:50                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 3/5] clocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-04-10  9:00                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-11  0:20                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-11 10:33                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-11 16:46                         ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-12  4:21                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-12 13:08                             ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-12 18:20                               ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-12 18:54                                 ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-12 19:57                                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-12 20:37                                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-12 23:18                                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-13 20:49                                         ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-14  4:48                                           ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 4/5] clocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-04-02 22:49                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource 5/5] clocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck
2021-04-10  9:04                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-11  0:21                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-10  8:01                 ` [PATCH v7 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable due to delays for v5.13 Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-10 23:26                   ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-11 10:58                     ` Thomas Gleixner
2021-04-11 16:50                       ` Paul E. McKenney
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Retry clock read if long delays detected paulmck
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Check per-CPU clock synchronization when marked unstable paulmck
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Provide a module parameter to fuzz per-CPU clock checking paulmck
2021-04-02 20:31           ` [PATCH v6 clocksource] Do not mark clocks unstable dueclocksource: Do pairwise clock-desynchronization checking paulmck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210304005320.25834-5-paulmck@kernel.org \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=Mark.Rutland@arm.com \
    --cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=neeraju@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=sboyd@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).