From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM <linux-pm@vger.kernel.org>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@intel.com>,
Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@pmeerw.net>,
linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@suse.com>,
Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
Linux PCI <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v1 2/4] ACPI: utils: Introduce acpi_evaluation_failure_warn()
Date: Fri, 05 Mar 2021 19:41:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3660317.i3jicEtL8u@kreacher> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2775419.haJ69vZeI0@kreacher>
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Quite a few users of ACPI objects want to log a warning message if
the evaluation fails which is a repeating pattern, so introduce a
helper function for that purpose and convert some code where it is
open-coded to using it.
No intentional functional impact.
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
drivers/acpi/pci_link.c | 6 ++----
drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c | 10 +++-------
drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c | 16 ++++------------
drivers/acpi/utils.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
include/linux/acpi.h | 5 +++++
5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/utils.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/utils.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/utils.c
@@ -512,6 +512,20 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(__acpi_handle_debug);
#endif
/**
+ * acpi_evaluation_failure_warn - Log evaluation failure warning.
+ * @handle: Parent object handle.
+ * @name: Name of the object whose evaluation has failed.
+ * @status: Status value returned by the failing object evaluation.
+ */
+void acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(acpi_handle handle, const char *name,
+ acpi_status status)
+{
+ acpi_handle_warn(handle, "%s evaluation failed: %s\n", name,
+ acpi_format_exception(status));
+}
+EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(acpi_evaluation_failure_warn);
+
+/**
* acpi_has_method: Check whether @handle has a method named @name
* @handle: ACPI device handle
* @name: name of object or method
Index: linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/include/linux/acpi.h
+++ linux-pm/include/linux/acpi.h
@@ -1027,9 +1027,14 @@ static inline void acpi_ec_set_gpe_wake_
__printf(3, 4)
void acpi_handle_printk(const char *level, acpi_handle handle,
const char *fmt, ...);
+void acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(acpi_handle handle, const char *name,
+ acpi_status status);
#else /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
static inline __printf(3, 4) void
acpi_handle_printk(const char *level, void *handle, const char *fmt, ...) {}
+static inline void acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(acpi_handle handle,
+ const char *name,
+ acpi_status status) {}
#endif /* !CONFIG_ACPI */
#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI) && defined(CONFIG_DYNAMIC_DEBUG)
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_throttling.c
@@ -281,9 +281,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_l
status = acpi_evaluate_integer(pr->handle, "_TPC", NULL, &tpc);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
- acpi_handle_warn(pr->handle,
- "_TPC evaluation failed: %s\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(pr->handle, "_TPC", status);
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -416,9 +414,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_throttling
status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_PTC", NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
- acpi_handle_warn(pr->handle,
- "_PTC evaluation failed: %s\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(pr->handle, "_PTC", status);
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -503,9 +499,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_throttling
status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_TSS", NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
- acpi_handle_warn(pr->handle,
- "_TSS evaluation failed: %s\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(pr->handle, "_TSS", status);
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -586,9 +580,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_tsd(struct
status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_TSD", NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
if (status != AE_NOT_FOUND)
- acpi_handle_warn(pr->handle,
- "_TSD evaluation failed: %s\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(pr->handle, "_TSD", status);
return -ENODEV;
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/pci_link.c
@@ -256,8 +256,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_get_current(str
status = acpi_walk_resources(handle, METHOD_NAME__CRS,
acpi_pci_link_check_current, &irq);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- acpi_handle_warn(handle, "_CRS evaluation failed: %s\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(handle, "_CRS", status);
result = -ENODEV;
goto end;
}
@@ -345,8 +344,7 @@ static int acpi_pci_link_set(struct acpi
/* check for total failure */
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- acpi_handle_warn(handle, "_SRS evaluation failed: %s",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(handle, "_SRS", status);
result = -ENODEV;
goto end;
}
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/processor_perflib.c
@@ -67,9 +67,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_platform_l
acpi_processor_ppc_in_use = true;
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- acpi_handle_warn(pr->handle,
- "_PPC evaluation failed: %s\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(pr->handle, "_PPC", status);
return -ENODEV;
}
}
@@ -199,8 +197,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performanc
status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_PCT", NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- acpi_handle_warn(pr->handle, "_PCT evaluation failed: %s\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(pr->handle, "_PCT", status);
return -ENODEV;
}
@@ -300,8 +297,7 @@ static int acpi_processor_get_performanc
status = acpi_evaluate_object(pr->handle, "_PSS", NULL, &buffer);
if (ACPI_FAILURE(status)) {
- acpi_handle_warn(pr->handle, "_PSS evaluation failed: %s\n",
- acpi_format_exception(status));
+ acpi_evaluation_failure_warn(pr->handle, "_PSS", status);
return -ENODEV;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-05 18:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-05 18:39 [PATCH v1 0/4] ACPI: New helper for warning messages and replacing ACPI_EXCEPTION() Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-05 18:40 ` [PATCH v1 1/4] ACPI: processor: perflib: Eliminate redundant status check Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-05 18:41 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2021-03-05 18:42 ` [PATCH v1 3/4] IIO: acpi-als: Get rid of ACPICA message printing Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-06 14:38 ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-03-05 18:43 ` [PATCH v1 4/4] hwmon: acpi_power_meter: " Rafael J. Wysocki
2021-03-06 3:20 ` Guenter Roeck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3660317.i3jicEtL8u@kreacher \
--to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=jdelvare@suse.com \
--cc=jic23@kernel.org \
--cc=lars@metafoo.de \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=pmeerw@pmeerw.net \
--cc=rui.zhang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).