From: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
To: guro@fb.com, ktkhai@virtuozzo.com, vbabka@suse.cz,
shakeelb@google.com, david@fromorbit.com, hannes@cmpxchg.org,
mhocko@suse.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: shy828301@gmail.com, linux-mm@kvack.org,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [v10 PATCH 06/13] mm: memcontrol: rename shrinker_map to shrinker_info
Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2021 11:08:38 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210311190845.9708-7-shy828301@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210311190845.9708-1-shy828301@gmail.com>
The following patch is going to add nr_deferred into shrinker_map, the change will
make shrinker_map not only include map anymore, so rename it to "memcg_shrinker_info".
And this should make the patch adding nr_deferred cleaner and readable and make
review easier. Also remove the "memcg_" prefix.
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Kirill Tkhai <ktkhai@virtuozzo.com>
Acked-by: Roman Gushchin <guro@fb.com>
Reviewed-by: Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Yang Shi <shy828301@gmail.com>
---
include/linux/memcontrol.h | 8 +++---
mm/memcontrol.c | 6 ++--
mm/vmscan.c | 58 +++++++++++++++++++-------------------
3 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/memcontrol.h b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
index b07dc2d5014d..dc7d0e2cb3ad 100644
--- a/include/linux/memcontrol.h
+++ b/include/linux/memcontrol.h
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@ struct batched_lruvec_stat {
* Bitmap of shrinker::id corresponding to memcg-aware shrinkers,
* which have elements charged to this memcg.
*/
-struct memcg_shrinker_map {
+struct shrinker_info {
struct rcu_head rcu;
unsigned long map[];
};
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ struct mem_cgroup_per_node {
struct mem_cgroup_reclaim_iter iter;
- struct memcg_shrinker_map __rcu *shrinker_map;
+ struct shrinker_info __rcu *shrinker_info;
struct rb_node tree_node; /* RB tree node */
unsigned long usage_in_excess;/* Set to the value by which */
@@ -1533,8 +1533,8 @@ static inline bool mem_cgroup_under_socket_pressure(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
return false;
}
-int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
-void free_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
+void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg);
void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id);
#else
#define mem_cgroup_sockets_enabled 0
diff --git a/mm/memcontrol.c b/mm/memcontrol.c
index aeb1847f159c..35d44afdd9fc 100644
--- a/mm/memcontrol.c
+++ b/mm/memcontrol.c
@@ -5131,11 +5131,11 @@ static int mem_cgroup_css_online(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
struct mem_cgroup *memcg = mem_cgroup_from_css(css);
/*
- * A memcg must be visible for expand_shrinker_maps()
+ * A memcg must be visible for expand_shrinker_info()
* by the time the maps are allocated. So, we allocate maps
* here, when for_each_mem_cgroup() can't skip it.
*/
- if (alloc_shrinker_maps(memcg)) {
+ if (alloc_shrinker_info(memcg)) {
mem_cgroup_id_remove(memcg);
return -ENOMEM;
}
@@ -5199,7 +5199,7 @@ static void mem_cgroup_css_free(struct cgroup_subsys_state *css)
vmpressure_cleanup(&memcg->vmpressure);
cancel_work_sync(&memcg->high_work);
mem_cgroup_remove_from_trees(memcg);
- free_shrinker_maps(memcg);
+ free_shrinker_info(memcg);
memcg_free_kmem(memcg);
mem_cgroup_free(memcg);
}
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index bbe13985ae05..7fdfdacf9a1f 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -192,16 +192,16 @@ static inline int shrinker_map_size(int nr_items)
return (DIV_ROUND_UP(nr_items, BITS_PER_LONG) * sizeof(unsigned long));
}
-static int expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
- int size, int old_size)
+static int expand_one_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
+ int size, int old_size)
{
- struct memcg_shrinker_map *new, *old;
+ struct shrinker_info *new, *old;
struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
int nid;
for_each_node(nid) {
pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
- old = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_map, true);
+ old = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
/* Not yet online memcg */
if (!old)
return 0;
@@ -214,17 +214,17 @@ static int expand_one_shrinker_map(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
memset(new->map, (int)0xff, old_size);
memset((void *)new->map + old_size, 0, size - old_size);
- rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, new);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, new);
kvfree_rcu(old, rcu);
}
return 0;
}
-void free_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+void free_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
struct mem_cgroup_per_node *pn;
- struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
+ struct shrinker_info *info;
int nid;
if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
@@ -232,15 +232,15 @@ void free_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
for_each_node(nid) {
pn = memcg->nodeinfo[nid];
- map = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_map, true);
- kvfree(map);
- rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_map, NULL);
+ info = rcu_dereference_protected(pn->shrinker_info, true);
+ kvfree(info);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(pn->shrinker_info, NULL);
}
}
-int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
+int alloc_shrinker_info(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
{
- struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
+ struct shrinker_info *info;
int nid, size, ret = 0;
if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
@@ -249,20 +249,20 @@ int alloc_shrinker_maps(struct mem_cgroup *memcg)
down_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
size = shrinker_map_size(shrinker_nr_max);
for_each_node(nid) {
- map = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*map) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
- if (!map) {
- free_shrinker_maps(memcg);
+ info = kvzalloc_node(sizeof(*info) + size, GFP_KERNEL, nid);
+ if (!info) {
+ free_shrinker_info(memcg);
ret = -ENOMEM;
break;
}
- rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map, map);
+ rcu_assign_pointer(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info, info);
}
up_write(&shrinker_rwsem);
return ret;
}
-static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
+static int expand_shrinker_info(int new_id)
{
int size, old_size, ret = 0;
int new_nr_max = new_id + 1;
@@ -282,7 +282,7 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
do {
if (mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg))
continue;
- ret = expand_one_shrinker_map(memcg, size, old_size);
+ ret = expand_one_shrinker_info(memcg, size, old_size);
if (ret) {
mem_cgroup_iter_break(NULL, memcg);
goto out;
@@ -298,13 +298,13 @@ static int expand_shrinker_maps(int new_id)
void set_shrinker_bit(struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int nid, int shrinker_id)
{
if (shrinker_id >= 0 && memcg && !mem_cgroup_is_root(memcg)) {
- struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
+ struct shrinker_info *info;
rcu_read_lock();
- map = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map);
+ info = rcu_dereference(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info);
/* Pairs with smp mb in shrink_slab() */
smp_mb__before_atomic();
- set_bit(shrinker_id, map->map);
+ set_bit(shrinker_id, info->map);
rcu_read_unlock();
}
}
@@ -335,7 +335,7 @@ static int prealloc_memcg_shrinker(struct shrinker *shrinker)
goto unlock;
if (id >= shrinker_nr_max) {
- if (expand_shrinker_maps(id)) {
+ if (expand_shrinker_info(id)) {
idr_remove(&shrinker_idr, id);
goto unlock;
}
@@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
struct mem_cgroup *memcg, int priority)
{
- struct memcg_shrinker_map *map;
+ struct shrinker_info *info;
unsigned long ret, freed = 0;
int i;
@@ -675,12 +675,12 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
if (!down_read_trylock(&shrinker_rwsem))
return 0;
- map = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_map,
- true);
- if (unlikely(!map))
+ info = rcu_dereference_protected(memcg->nodeinfo[nid]->shrinker_info,
+ true);
+ if (unlikely(!info))
goto unlock;
- for_each_set_bit(i, map->map, shrinker_nr_max) {
+ for_each_set_bit(i, info->map, shrinker_nr_max) {
struct shrink_control sc = {
.gfp_mask = gfp_mask,
.nid = nid,
@@ -691,7 +691,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
shrinker = idr_find(&shrinker_idr, i);
if (unlikely(!shrinker || shrinker == SHRINKER_REGISTERING)) {
if (!shrinker)
- clear_bit(i, map->map);
+ clear_bit(i, info->map);
continue;
}
@@ -702,7 +702,7 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab_memcg(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
ret = do_shrink_slab(&sc, shrinker, priority);
if (ret == SHRINK_EMPTY) {
- clear_bit(i, map->map);
+ clear_bit(i, info->map);
/*
* After the shrinker reported that it had no objects to
* free, but before we cleared the corresponding bit in
--
2.26.2
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-03-11 19:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-11 19:08 [v10 PATCH 00/13] Make shrinker's nr_deferred memcg aware Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 01/13] mm: vmscan: use nid from shrink_control for tracepoint Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 02/13] mm: vmscan: consolidate shrinker_maps handling code Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 03/13] mm: vmscan: use shrinker_rwsem to protect shrinker_maps allocation Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 04/13] mm: vmscan: remove memcg_shrinker_map_size Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 05/13] mm: vmscan: use kvfree_rcu instead of call_rcu Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` Yang Shi [this message]
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 07/13] mm: vmscan: add shrinker_info_protected() helper Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 08/13] mm: vmscan: use a new flag to indicate shrinker is registered Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 09/13] mm: vmscan: add per memcg shrinker nr_deferred Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 10/13] mm: vmscan: use per memcg nr_deferred of shrinker Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 11/13] mm: vmscan: don't need allocate shrinker->nr_deferred for memcg aware shrinkers Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 12/13] mm: memcontrol: reparent nr_deferred when memcg offline Yang Shi
2021-03-11 19:08 ` [v10 PATCH 13/13] mm: vmscan: shrink deferred objects proportional to priority Yang Shi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210311190845.9708-7-shy828301@gmail.com \
--to=shy828301@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=david@fromorbit.com \
--cc=guro@fb.com \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=ktkhai@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=shakeelb@google.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).