linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Peter Xu <peterx@redhat.com>,
	Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>,
	Peter Shier <pshier@google.com>,
	Peter Feiner <pfeiner@google.com>,
	Junaid Shahid <junaids@google.com>,
	Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
	Yulei Zhang <yulei.kernel@gmail.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <kernellwp@gmail.com>,
	Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>,
	Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com>,
	Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH 11/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow enabling / disabling dirty logging under MMU read lock
Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2021 14:08:39 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210331210841.3996155-12-bgardon@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210331210841.3996155-1-bgardon@google.com>

To reduce lock contention and interference with page fault handlers,
allow the TDP MMU functions which enable and disable dirty logging
to operate under the MMU read lock.

Signed-off-by: Ben Gardon <bgardon@google.com>
---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c     | 16 +++++++---
 arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c | 62 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 2 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
index 81967b4e7d76..bf535c9f7ff2 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/mmu.c
@@ -5543,10 +5543,14 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_remove_write_access(struct kvm *kvm,
 	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 	flush = slot_handle_level(kvm, memslot, slot_rmap_write_protect,
 				start_level, KVM_MAX_HUGEPAGE_LEVEL, false);
-	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
-		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(kvm, memslot, PG_LEVEL_4K);
 	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
+	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm)) {
+		read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(kvm, memslot, PG_LEVEL_4K);
+		read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * We can flush all the TLBs out of the mmu lock without TLB
 	 * corruption since we just change the spte from writable to
@@ -5641,10 +5645,14 @@ void kvm_mmu_slot_leaf_clear_dirty(struct kvm *kvm,
 
 	write_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 	flush = slot_handle_leaf(kvm, memslot, __rmap_clear_dirty, false);
-	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm))
-		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(kvm, memslot);
 	write_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
+	if (is_tdp_mmu_enabled(kvm)) {
+		read_lock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+		flush |= kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(kvm, memslot);
+		read_unlock(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+	}
+
 	/*
 	 * It's also safe to flush TLBs out of mmu lock here as currently this
 	 * function is only used for dirty logging, in which case flushing TLB
diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
index 862acb868abd..0c90dc034819 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kvm/mmu/tdp_mmu.c
@@ -491,8 +491,9 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
 }
 
 /*
- * tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic - Set a TDP MMU SPTE atomically and handle the
- * associated bookkeeping
+ * tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic_no_dirty_log - Set a TDP MMU SPTE atomically
+ * and handle the associated bookkeeping, but do not mark the page dirty
+ * in KVM's dirty bitmaps.
  *
  * @kvm: kvm instance
  * @iter: a tdp_iter instance currently on the SPTE that should be set
@@ -500,9 +501,9 @@ static void handle_changed_spte(struct kvm *kvm, int as_id, gfn_t gfn,
  * Returns: true if the SPTE was set, false if it was not. If false is returned,
  *	    this function will have no side-effects.
  */
-static inline bool tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
-					   struct tdp_iter *iter,
-					   u64 new_spte)
+static inline bool tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic_no_dirty_log(struct kvm *kvm,
+							struct tdp_iter *iter,
+							u64 new_spte)
 {
 	lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
 
@@ -517,9 +518,22 @@ static inline bool tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
 		      new_spte) != iter->old_spte)
 		return false;
 
-	handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
-			    new_spte, iter->level, true);
+	__handle_changed_spte(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn, iter->old_spte,
+			      new_spte, iter->level, true);
+	handle_changed_spte_acc_track(iter->old_spte, new_spte, iter->level);
+
+	return true;
+}
+
+static inline bool tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic(struct kvm *kvm,
+					   struct tdp_iter *iter,
+					   u64 new_spte)
+{
+	if (!tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic_no_dirty_log(kvm, iter, new_spte))
+		return false;
 
+	handle_changed_spte_dirty_log(kvm, iter->as_id, iter->gfn,
+				      iter->old_spte, new_spte, iter->level);
 	return true;
 }
 
@@ -1142,7 +1156,8 @@ static bool wrprot_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 
 	for_each_tdp_pte_min_level(iter, root->spt, root->role.level,
 				   min_level, start, end) {
-		if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, false))
+retry:
+		if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, true))
 			continue;
 
 		if (!is_shadow_present_pte(iter.old_spte) ||
@@ -1152,7 +1167,15 @@ static bool wrprot_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 
 		new_spte = iter.old_spte & ~PT_WRITABLE_MASK;
 
-		tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
+		if (!tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter,
+							  new_spte)) {
+			/*
+			 * The iter must explicitly re-read the SPTE because
+			 * the atomic cmpxchg failed.
+			 */
+			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
+			goto retry;
+		}
 		spte_set = true;
 	}
 
@@ -1172,7 +1195,9 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_wrprot_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot,
 	int root_as_id;
 	bool spte_set = false;
 
-	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, false) {
+	lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, true) {
 		root_as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
 		if (root_as_id != slot->as_id)
 			continue;
@@ -1201,7 +1226,8 @@ static bool clear_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	tdp_root_for_each_leaf_pte(iter, root, start, end) {
-		if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, false))
+retry:
+		if (tdp_mmu_iter_cond_resched(kvm, &iter, false, true))
 			continue;
 
 		if (spte_ad_need_write_protect(iter.old_spte)) {
@@ -1216,7 +1242,15 @@ static bool clear_dirty_gfn_range(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_mmu_page *root,
 				continue;
 		}
 
-		tdp_mmu_set_spte_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter, new_spte);
+		if (!tdp_mmu_set_spte_atomic_no_dirty_log(kvm, &iter,
+							  new_spte)) {
+			/*
+			 * The iter must explicitly re-read the SPTE because
+			 * the atomic cmpxchg failed.
+			 */
+			iter.old_spte = READ_ONCE(*rcu_dereference(iter.sptep));
+			goto retry;
+		}
 		spte_set = true;
 	}
 
@@ -1237,7 +1271,9 @@ bool kvm_tdp_mmu_clear_dirty_slot(struct kvm *kvm, struct kvm_memory_slot *slot)
 	int root_as_id;
 	bool spte_set = false;
 
-	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, false) {
+	lockdep_assert_held_read(&kvm->mmu_lock);
+
+	for_each_tdp_mmu_root_yield_safe(kvm, root, true) {
 		root_as_id = kvm_mmu_page_as_id(root);
 		if (root_as_id != slot->as_id)
 			continue;
-- 
2.31.0.291.g576ba9dcdaf-goog


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-03-31 21:10 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-31 21:08 [PATCH 00/13] More parallel operations for the TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 01/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Re-add const qualifier in kvm_tdp_mmu_zap_collapsible_sptes Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 02/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Move kvm_mmu_(get|put)_root to TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 03/13] KVM: x86/mmu: use tdp_mmu_free_sp to free roots Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 04/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Merge TDP MMU put and free root Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 05/13] KVM: x86/mmu: comment for_each_tdp_mmu_root requires MMU write lock Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 06/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Refactor yield safe root iterator Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 07/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Make TDP MMU root refcount atomic Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 22:21   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 16:50     ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 08/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Protect the tdp_mmu_roots list with RCU Ben Gardon
2021-04-01  9:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 16:48     ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 13:16   ` kernel test robot
2021-04-01 16:50     ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 09/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow zap gfn range to operate under the mmu read lock Ben Gardon
2021-04-01  9:58   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 16:50     ` Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 10/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Allow zapping collapsible SPTEs to use MMU " Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 10:12   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:08 ` Ben Gardon [this message]
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 12/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Fast invalidation for TDP MMU Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 22:27   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 16:50     ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 10:36   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 16:50     ` Ben Gardon
2021-04-01 17:02       ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-03-31 21:08 ` [PATCH 13/13] KVM: x86/mmu: Tear down roots in fast invalidation thread Ben Gardon
2021-03-31 22:29   ` Sean Christopherson
2021-04-01 10:41     ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 10:37   ` Paolo Bonzini
2021-04-01 10:43 ` [PATCH 00/13] More parallel operations for the TDP MMU Paolo Bonzini

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210331210841.3996155-12-bgardon@google.com \
    --to=bgardon@google.com \
    --cc=jmattson@google.com \
    --cc=junaids@google.com \
    --cc=kernellwp@gmail.com \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterx@redhat.com \
    --cc=pfeiner@google.com \
    --cc=pshier@google.com \
    --cc=seanjc@google.com \
    --cc=vkuznets@redhat.com \
    --cc=xiaoguangrong.eric@gmail.com \
    --cc=yulei.kernel@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).