From: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm: eliminate "expecting prototype" kernel-doc warnings
Date: Sun, 11 Apr 2021 10:43:21 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210411174321.7013-1-rdunlap@infradead.org> (raw)
Fix stray kernel-doc warnings in mm/ due to mis-typed or missing
function names.
Quietens these kernel-doc warnings:
../mm/mmu_gather.c:264: warning: expecting prototype for tlb_gather_mmu(). Prototype was for __tlb_gather_mmu() instead
../mm/oom_kill.c:180: warning: expecting prototype for Check whether unreclaimable slab amount is greater than(). Prototype was for should_dump_unreclaim_slab() instead
../mm/shuffle.c:155: warning: expecting prototype for shuffle_free_memory(). Prototype was for __shuffle_free_memory() instead
Signed-off-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org
---
mm/mmu_gather.c | 2 +-
mm/oom_kill.c | 7 ++++---
mm/shuffle.c | 2 +-
3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- linux-next-20210409.orig/mm/mmu_gather.c
+++ linux-next-20210409/mm/mmu_gather.c
@@ -250,7 +250,7 @@ void tlb_flush_mmu(struct mmu_gather *tl
}
/**
- * tlb_gather_mmu - initialize an mmu_gather structure for page-table tear-down
+ * __tlb_gather_mmu - initialize an mmu_gather structure for page-table tear-down
* @tlb: the mmu_gather structure to initialize
* @mm: the mm_struct of the target address space
* @fullmm: @mm is without users and we're going to destroy the full address
--- linux-next-20210409.orig/mm/oom_kill.c
+++ linux-next-20210409/mm/oom_kill.c
@@ -171,10 +171,11 @@ static bool oom_unkillable_task(struct t
}
/**
- * Check whether unreclaimable slab amount is greater than
- * all user memory(LRU pages).
+ * should_dump_unreclaim_slab - Check whether unreclaimable slab amount
+ * is greater than all user memory (LRU pages).
+ *
* dump_unreclaimable_slab() could help in the case that
- * oom due to too much unreclaimable slab used by kernel.
+ * oom is due to too much unreclaimable slab used by kernel.
*/
static bool should_dump_unreclaim_slab(void)
{
--- linux-next-20210409.orig/mm/shuffle.c
+++ linux-next-20210409/mm/shuffle.c
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@ void __meminit __shuffle_zone(struct zon
}
/**
- * shuffle_free_memory - reduce the predictability of the page allocator
+ * __shuffle_free_memory - reduce the predictability of the page allocator
* @pgdat: node page data
*/
void __meminit __shuffle_free_memory(pg_data_t *pgdat)
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-11 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-11 17:43 Randy Dunlap [this message]
2021-04-11 18:35 ` [PATCH] mm: eliminate "expecting prototype" kernel-doc warnings Matthew Wilcox
2021-04-11 21:01 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210411174321.7013-1-rdunlap@infradead.org \
--to=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).