linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhouchuangao <zhouchuangao@vivo.com>
To: Jessica Yu <jeyu@kernel.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: zhouchuangao <zhouchuangao@vivo.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kernel/module: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG.
Date: Sat, 17 Apr 2021 03:22:01 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1618654921-124063-1-git-send-email-zhouchuangao@vivo.com> (raw)

First:
This patch comes from cocinelle warning.

Second:
BUG_ON uses unlikely in if(). Through disassembly, we can see that
brk #0x800 is compiled to the end of the function.
As you can see below:
    ......
    ffffff8008660bec:   d65f03c0    ret
    ffffff8008660bf0:   d4210000    brk #0x800

Usually, the condition in if () is not satisfied. For the
multi-stage pipeline, we do not need to perform fetch decode
and excute operation on brk instruction.

In my opinion, this can improve the efficiency of the
multi-stage pipeline.

Signed-off-by: zhouchuangao <zhouchuangao@vivo.com>
---
 kernel/module.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/module.c b/kernel/module.c
index 3047935..f46fc4f 100644
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1014,8 +1014,8 @@ void __symbol_put(const char *symbol)
 	};
 
 	preempt_disable();
-	if (!find_symbol(&fsa))
-		BUG();
+	BUG_ON(!find_symbol(&fsa));
+
 	module_put(fsa.owner);
 	preempt_enable();
 }
-- 
2.7.4


             reply	other threads:[~2021-04-17 10:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-17 10:22 zhouchuangao [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-05-10  1:38 [PATCH] kernel/module: Use BUG_ON instead of if condition followed by BUG zhouchuangao
2021-05-12 12:54 ` Jessica Yu
2021-03-30 12:07 zhouchuangao
2021-04-12 13:04 ` Jessica Yu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1618654921-124063-1-git-send-email-zhouchuangao@vivo.com \
    --to=zhouchuangao@vivo.com \
    --cc=jeyu@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).