From: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Kernel Team <kernel-team@fb.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@arm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3] sched,fair: skip newidle_balance if a wakeup is pending
Date: Tue, 20 Apr 2021 12:07:05 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210420120705.5c705d4b@imladris.surriel.com> (raw)
The try_to_wake_up function has an optimization where it can queue
a task for wakeup on its previous CPU, if the task is still in the
middle of going to sleep inside schedule().
Once schedule() re-enables IRQs, the task will be woken up with an
IPI, and placed back on the runqueue.
If we have such a wakeup pending, there is no need to search other
CPUs for runnable tasks. Just skip (or bail out early from) newidle
balancing, and run the just woken up task.
For a memcache like workload test, this reduces total CPU use by
about 2%, proportionally split between user and system time,
and p99 and p95 application response time by 10% on average.
The schedstats run_delay number shows a similar improvement.
Signed-off-by: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
---
kernel/sched/fair.c | 18 ++++++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index 69680158963f..fd80175c3b3e 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -10594,6 +10594,14 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
u64 curr_cost = 0;
update_misfit_status(NULL, this_rq);
+
+ /*
+ * There is a task waiting to run. No need to search for one.
+ * Return 0; the task will be enqueued when switching to idle.
+ */
+ if (this_rq->ttwu_pending)
+ return 0;
+
/*
* We must set idle_stamp _before_ calling idle_balance(), such that we
* measure the duration of idle_balance() as idle time.
@@ -10661,7 +10669,8 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
* Stop searching for tasks to pull if there are
* now runnable tasks on this rq.
*/
- if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0)
+ if (pulled_task || this_rq->nr_running > 0 ||
+ this_rq->ttwu_pending)
break;
}
rcu_read_unlock();
@@ -10688,7 +10697,12 @@ static int newidle_balance(struct rq *this_rq, struct rq_flags *rf)
if (this_rq->nr_running != this_rq->cfs.h_nr_running)
pulled_task = -1;
- if (pulled_task)
+ /*
+ * If we are no longer idle, do not let the time spent here pull
+ * down this_rq->avg_idle. That could lead to newidle_balance not
+ * doing enough work, and the CPU actually going idle.
+ */
+ if (pulled_task || this_rq->ttwu_pending)
this_rq->idle_stamp = 0;
rq_repin_lock(this_rq, rf);
--
2.25.4
next reply other threads:[~2021-04-20 16:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-04-20 16:07 Rik van Riel [this message]
2021-04-21 17:27 ` [PATCH v3] sched,fair: skip newidle_balance if a wakeup is pending Vincent Guittot
2021-04-22 8:37 ` Vincent Guittot
2021-04-22 16:47 ` Rik van Riel
2021-04-22 7:36 ` [tip: sched/core] " tip-bot2 for Rik van Riel
2021-04-22 8:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210420120705.5c705d4b@imladris.surriel.com \
--to=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=kernel-team@fb.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=valentin.schneider@arm.com \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).