linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
To: willy@infradead.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org,
	hannes@cmpxchg.org, mhocko@kernel.org, vdavydov.dev@gmail.com,
	shakeelb@google.com, guro@fb.com, shy828301@gmail.com,
	alexs@kernel.org, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, david@fromorbit.com,
	trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com, anna.schumaker@netapp.com
Cc: linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org,
	zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com, duanxiongchun@bytedance.com,
	fam.zheng@bytedance.com, Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
Subject: [PATCH 14/17] nfs42: use a specific kmem_cache to allocate nfs4_xattr_entry
Date: Tue, 11 May 2021 18:46:44 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210511104647.604-15-songmuchun@bytedance.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210511104647.604-1-songmuchun@bytedance.com>

If we want to add the allocated objects to its list_lru, we should use
kmem_cache_alloc_lru() to allocate objects. So intruduce
nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep which is used to allocate nfs4_xattr_entry.

Signed-off-by: Muchun Song <songmuchun@bytedance.com>
---
 fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c | 95 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------------
 1 file changed, 47 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
index 1c4d2a05b401..5b7af9080db0 100644
--- a/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
+++ b/fs/nfs/nfs42xattr.c
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ struct nfs4_xattr_entry {
 	struct hlist_node hnode;
 	struct list_head lru;
 	struct list_head dispose;
-	char *xattr_name;
+	const char *xattr_name;
 	void *xattr_value;
 	size_t xattr_size;
 	struct nfs4_xattr_bucket *bucket;
@@ -98,6 +98,7 @@ static struct list_lru nfs4_xattr_entry_lru;
 static struct list_lru nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru;
 
 static struct kmem_cache *nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep;
+static struct kmem_cache *nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep;
 
 /*
  * Hashing helper functions.
@@ -177,49 +178,27 @@ nfs4_xattr_alloc_entry(const char *name, const void *value,
 {
 	struct nfs4_xattr_entry *entry;
 	void *valp;
-	char *namep;
-	size_t alloclen, slen;
-	char *buf;
-	uint32_t flags;
+	const char *namep;
+	uint32_t flags = len > PAGE_SIZE ? NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL : 0;
+	gfp_t gfp = GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | GFP_NOFS;
+	struct list_lru *lru;
 
 	BUILD_BUG_ON(sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry) +
 	    XATTR_NAME_MAX + 1 > PAGE_SIZE);
 
-	alloclen = sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry);
-	if (name != NULL) {
-		slen = strlen(name) + 1;
-		alloclen += slen;
-	} else
-		slen = 0;
-
-	if (alloclen + len <= PAGE_SIZE) {
-		alloclen += len;
-		flags = 0;
-	} else {
-		flags = NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL;
-	}
-
-	buf = kmalloc(alloclen, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | GFP_NOFS);
-	if (buf == NULL)
+	lru = flags & NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL ? &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru :
+	      &nfs4_xattr_entry_lru;
+	entry = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep, lru, gfp);
+	if (!entry)
 		return NULL;
-	entry = (struct nfs4_xattr_entry *)buf;
-
-	if (name != NULL) {
-		namep = buf + sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry);
-		memcpy(namep, name, slen);
-	} else {
-		namep = NULL;
-	}
-
-
-	if (flags & NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL) {
-		valp = kvmalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | GFP_NOFS);
-		if (valp == NULL) {
-			kfree(buf);
-			return NULL;
-		}
-	} else if (len != 0) {
-		valp = buf + sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry) + slen;
+	namep = kstrdup_const(name, gfp);
+	if (!namep && name)
+		goto free_buf;
+
+	if (len != 0) {
+		valp = kvmalloc(len, gfp);
+		if (!valp)
+			goto free_name;
 	} else
 		valp = NULL;
 
@@ -232,23 +211,23 @@ nfs4_xattr_alloc_entry(const char *name, const void *value,
 
 	entry->flags = flags;
 	entry->xattr_value = valp;
-	kref_init(&entry->ref);
 	entry->xattr_name = namep;
 	entry->xattr_size = len;
-	entry->bucket = NULL;
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru);
-	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->dispose);
-	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&entry->hnode);
 
 	return entry;
+free_name:
+	kfree_const(namep);
+free_buf:
+	kmem_cache_free(nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep, entry);
+	return NULL;
 }
 
 static void
 nfs4_xattr_free_entry(struct nfs4_xattr_entry *entry)
 {
-	if (entry->flags & NFS4_XATTR_ENTRY_EXTVAL)
-		kvfree(entry->xattr_value);
-	kfree(entry);
+	kvfree(entry->xattr_value);
+	kfree_const(entry->xattr_name);
+	kmem_cache_free(nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep, entry);
 }
 
 static void
@@ -289,7 +268,7 @@ nfs4_xattr_alloc_cache(void)
 {
 	struct nfs4_xattr_cache *cache;
 
-	cache = kmem_cache_alloc(nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep,
+	cache = kmem_cache_alloc_lru(nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep, &nfs4_xattr_cache_lru,
 	    GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | GFP_NOFS);
 	if (cache == NULL)
 		return NULL;
@@ -992,6 +971,17 @@ static void nfs4_xattr_cache_init_once(void *p)
 	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&cache->dispose);
 }
 
+static void nfs4_xattr_entry_init_once(void *p)
+{
+	struct nfs4_xattr_entry *entry = p;
+
+	kref_init(&entry->ref);
+	entry->bucket = NULL;
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->lru);
+	INIT_LIST_HEAD(&entry->dispose);
+	INIT_HLIST_NODE(&entry->hnode);
+}
+
 int __init nfs4_xattr_cache_init(void)
 {
 	int ret = 0;
@@ -1003,6 +993,13 @@ int __init nfs4_xattr_cache_init(void)
 	if (nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep == NULL)
 		return -ENOMEM;
 
+	nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep = kmem_cache_create("nfs4_xattr_entry",
+			sizeof(struct nfs4_xattr_entry), 0,
+			(SLAB_RECLAIM_ACCOUNT | SLAB_MEM_SPREAD | SLAB_ACCOUNT),
+			nfs4_xattr_entry_init_once);
+	if (!nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep)
+		goto out5;
+
 	ret = list_lru_init_memcg(&nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru,
 	    &nfs4_xattr_large_entry_shrinker);
 	if (ret)
@@ -1040,6 +1037,8 @@ int __init nfs4_xattr_cache_init(void)
 out3:
 	list_lru_destroy(&nfs4_xattr_large_entry_lru);
 out4:
+	kmem_cache_destroy(nfs4_xattr_entry_cachep);
+out5:
 	kmem_cache_destroy(nfs4_xattr_cache_cachep);
 
 	return ret;
-- 
2.11.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-11 10:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-11 10:46 [PATCH 00/17] Optimize list lru memory consumption Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 01/17] mm: list_lru: fix list_lru_count_one() return value Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 02/17] mm: memcontrol: remove kmemcg_id reparenting Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 03/17] mm: memcontrol: remove the kmem states Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 04/17] mm: memcontrol: move memcg_online_kmem() to mem_cgroup_css_online() Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 05/17] mm: list_lru: remove holding lru node lock Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 06/17] mm: list_lru: only add the memcg aware lrus to the list Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 07/17] mm: list_lru: optimize the array of per memcg lists Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 08/17] mm: list_lru: remove memcg_aware from struct list_lru Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 09/17] mm: introduce kmem_cache_alloc_lru Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 10/17] fs: introduce alloc_inode_sb() to allocate filesystems specific inode Muchun Song
2021-05-11 23:40   ` Dave Chinner
2021-05-12  3:20     ` [External] " Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 11/17] mm: dcache: use kmem_cache_alloc_lru() to allocate dentry Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 12/17] xarray: replace kmem_cache_alloc with kmem_cache_alloc_lru Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 13/17] mm: workingset: allocate list_lru on xa_node allocation Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` Muchun Song [this message]
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 15/17] mm: list_lru: allocate list_lru_one only when needed Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 16/17] mm: list_lru: rename memcg_drain_all_list_lrus to memcg_reparent_list_lrus Muchun Song
2021-05-11 10:46 ` [PATCH 17/17] mm: list_lru: replace linear array with xarray Muchun Song

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210511104647.604-15-songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --to=songmuchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=alexs@kernel.org \
    --cc=anna.schumaker@netapp.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=duanxiongchun@bytedance.com \
    --cc=fam.zheng@bytedance.com \
    --cc=guro@fb.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-nfs@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mhocko@kernel.org \
    --cc=richard.weiyang@gmail.com \
    --cc=shakeelb@google.com \
    --cc=shy828301@gmail.com \
    --cc=trond.myklebust@hammerspace.com \
    --cc=vdavydov.dev@gmail.com \
    --cc=willy@infradead.org \
    --cc=zhengqi.arch@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).