From: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
Cc: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@microchip.com>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@microchip.com>,
Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: Constify struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops
Date: Wed, 12 May 2021 20:01:40 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210512180140.33293-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com> (raw)
The at91_pinctrl_mux_ops struct is never modified by the driver. Make it
const wherever it is possible to allow the compiler to put the static
variables in read-only memory. Note that sam9x60_ops was already const,
but the const was cast away when the return value of of_match_device() was
cast to a pointer to a non-const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops.
Signed-off-by: Rikard Falkeborn <rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
index fc61aaec34cc..72e6df7abe8c 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinctrl-at91.c
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@ struct at91_gpio_chip {
int pioc_idx; /* PIO bank index */
void __iomem *regbase; /* PIO bank virtual address */
struct clk *clock; /* associated clock */
- struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *ops; /* ops */
+ const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *ops; /* ops */
};
static struct at91_gpio_chip *gpio_chips[MAX_GPIO_BANKS];
@@ -210,7 +210,7 @@ struct at91_pinctrl {
struct at91_pin_group *groups;
int ngroups;
- struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *ops;
+ const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *ops;
};
static inline const struct at91_pin_group *at91_pinctrl_find_group_by_name(
@@ -688,7 +688,7 @@ static void at91_mux_sam9x60_set_slewrate(void __iomem *pio, unsigned pin,
writel_relaxed(tmp, pio + SAM9X60_PIO_SLEWR);
}
-static struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops at91rm9200_ops = {
+static const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops at91rm9200_ops = {
.get_periph = at91_mux_get_periph,
.mux_A_periph = at91_mux_set_A_periph,
.mux_B_periph = at91_mux_set_B_periph,
@@ -697,7 +697,7 @@ static struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops at91rm9200_ops = {
.irq_type = gpio_irq_type,
};
-static struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops at91sam9x5_ops = {
+static const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops at91sam9x5_ops = {
.get_periph = at91_mux_pio3_get_periph,
.mux_A_periph = at91_mux_pio3_set_A_periph,
.mux_B_periph = at91_mux_pio3_set_B_periph,
@@ -737,7 +737,7 @@ static const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops sam9x60_ops = {
.irq_type = alt_gpio_irq_type,
};
-static struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops sama5d3_ops = {
+static const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops sama5d3_ops = {
.get_periph = at91_mux_pio3_get_periph,
.mux_A_periph = at91_mux_pio3_set_A_periph,
.mux_B_periph = at91_mux_pio3_set_B_periph,
@@ -1284,7 +1284,7 @@ static int at91_pinctrl_probe_dt(struct platform_device *pdev,
return -ENODEV;
info->dev = &pdev->dev;
- info->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *)
+ info->ops = (const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *)
of_match_device(at91_pinctrl_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
at91_pinctrl_child_count(info, np);
@@ -1849,7 +1849,7 @@ static int at91_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err;
}
- at91_chip->ops = (struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *)
+ at91_chip->ops = (const struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops *)
of_match_device(at91_gpio_of_match, &pdev->dev)->data;
at91_chip->pioc_virq = irq;
at91_chip->pioc_idx = alias_idx;
--
2.31.1
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-12 19:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-12 18:01 Rikard Falkeborn [this message]
2021-05-25 0:09 ` [PATCH] pinctrl: at91: Constify struct at91_pinctrl_mux_ops Linus Walleij
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210512180140.33293-1-rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com \
--to=rikard.falkeborn@gmail.com \
--cc=alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com \
--cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-gpio@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=ludovic.desroches@microchip.com \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@microchip.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).