linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
To: linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>,
	Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v4 2/8] cxl/mem: Introduce 'struct cxl_regs' for "composable" CXL devices
Date: Thu, 13 May 2021 22:21:54 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <162096971451.1865304.13540251513463515153.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <162096970332.1865304.10280028741091576940.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com>

CXL MMIO register blocks are organized by device type and capabilities.
There are Component registers, Device registers (yes, an ambiguous
name), and Memory Device registers (a specific extension of Device
registers).

It is possible for a given device instance (endpoint or port) to
implement register sets from multiple of the above categories.

The driver code that enumerates and maps the registers is type specific
so it is useful to have a dedicated type and helpers for each block
type.

At the same time, once the registers are mapped the origin type does not
matter. It is overly pedantic to reference the register block type in
code that is using the registers.

In preparation for the endpoint driver to incorporate Component registers
into its MMIO operations reorganize the registers to allow typed
enumeration + mapping, but anonymous usage. With the end state of
'struct cxl_regs' to be:

struct cxl_regs {
	union {
		struct {
			CXL_DEVICE_REGS();
		};
		struct cxl_device_regs device_regs;
	};
	union {
		struct {
			CXL_COMPONENT_REGS();
		};
		struct cxl_component_regs component_regs;
	};
};

With this arrangement the driver can share component init code with
ports, but when using the registers it can directly reference the
component register block type by name without the 'component_regs'
prefix.

So, map + enumerate can be shared across drivers of different CXL
classes e.g.:

void cxl_setup_device_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base,
			   struct cxl_device_regs *regs);

void cxl_setup_component_regs(struct device *dev, void __iomem *base,
			      struct cxl_component_regs *regs);

...while inline usage in the driver need not indicate where the
registers came from:

readl(cxlm->regs.mbox + MBOX_OFFSET);
readl(cxlm->regs.hdm + HDM_OFFSET);

...instead of:

readl(cxlm->regs.device_regs.mbox + MBOX_OFFSET);
readl(cxlm->regs.component_regs.hdm + HDM_OFFSET);

This complexity of the definition in .h yields improvement in code
readability in .c while maintaining type-safety for organization of
setup code. It prepares the implementation to maintain organization in
the face of CXL devices that compose register interfaces consisting of
multiple types.

Given that this new container is named 'regs' rename the common register
base pointer @base, and fixup the kernel-doc for the missing @cxlmd
description.

Reviewed-by: Ben Widawsky <ben.widawsky@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/cxl/cxl.h |   32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 drivers/cxl/mem.c |   44 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------
 drivers/cxl/mem.h |   13 +++++--------
 3 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
index 2e3bdacb32e7..1f3434f89ef2 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
+++ b/drivers/cxl/cxl.h
@@ -34,5 +34,37 @@
 #define CXLDEV_MBOX_BG_CMD_STATUS_OFFSET 0x18
 #define CXLDEV_MBOX_PAYLOAD_OFFSET 0x20
 
+/*
+ * CXL_DEVICE_REGS - Common set of CXL Device register block base pointers
+ * @status: CXL 2.0 8.2.8.3 Device Status Registers
+ * @mbox: CXL 2.0 8.2.8.4 Mailbox Registers
+ * @memdev: CXL 2.0 8.2.8.5 Memory Device Registers
+ */
+#define CXL_DEVICE_REGS() \
+	void __iomem *status; \
+	void __iomem *mbox; \
+	void __iomem *memdev
+
+/* See note for 'struct cxl_regs' for the rationale of this organization */
+struct cxl_device_regs {
+	CXL_DEVICE_REGS();
+};
+
+/*
+ * Note, the anonymous union organization allows for per
+ * register-block-type helper routines, without requiring block-type
+ * agnostic code to include the prefix. I.e.
+ * cxl_setup_device_regs(&cxlm->regs.dev) vs readl(cxlm->regs.mbox).
+ * The specificity reads naturally from left-to-right.
+ */
+struct cxl_regs {
+	union {
+		struct {
+			CXL_DEVICE_REGS();
+		};
+		struct cxl_device_regs device_regs;
+	};
+};
+
 extern struct bus_type cxl_bus_type;
 #endif /* __CXL_H__ */
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.c b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
index 53933d7d8d12..ddc94c7bd422 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/mem.c
+++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.c
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
  */
 
 #define cxl_doorbell_busy(cxlm)                                                \
-	(readl((cxlm)->mbox_regs + CXLDEV_MBOX_CTRL_OFFSET) &                  \
+	(readl((cxlm)->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_CTRL_OFFSET) &                  \
 	 CXLDEV_MBOX_CTRL_DOORBELL)
 
 /* CXL 2.0 - 8.2.8.4 */
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ static void cxl_mem_mbox_timeout(struct cxl_mem *cxlm,
 static int __cxl_mem_mbox_send_cmd(struct cxl_mem *cxlm,
 				   struct mbox_cmd *mbox_cmd)
 {
-	void __iomem *payload = cxlm->mbox_regs + CXLDEV_MBOX_PAYLOAD_OFFSET;
+	void __iomem *payload = cxlm->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_PAYLOAD_OFFSET;
 	u64 cmd_reg, status_reg;
 	size_t out_len;
 	int rc;
@@ -316,12 +316,12 @@ static int __cxl_mem_mbox_send_cmd(struct cxl_mem *cxlm,
 	}
 
 	/* #2, #3 */
-	writeq(cmd_reg, cxlm->mbox_regs + CXLDEV_MBOX_CMD_OFFSET);
+	writeq(cmd_reg, cxlm->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_CMD_OFFSET);
 
 	/* #4 */
 	dev_dbg(&cxlm->pdev->dev, "Sending command\n");
 	writel(CXLDEV_MBOX_CTRL_DOORBELL,
-	       cxlm->mbox_regs + CXLDEV_MBOX_CTRL_OFFSET);
+	       cxlm->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_CTRL_OFFSET);
 
 	/* #5 */
 	rc = cxl_mem_wait_for_doorbell(cxlm);
@@ -331,7 +331,7 @@ static int __cxl_mem_mbox_send_cmd(struct cxl_mem *cxlm,
 	}
 
 	/* #6 */
-	status_reg = readq(cxlm->mbox_regs + CXLDEV_MBOX_STATUS_OFFSET);
+	status_reg = readq(cxlm->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_STATUS_OFFSET);
 	mbox_cmd->return_code =
 		FIELD_GET(CXLDEV_MBOX_STATUS_RET_CODE_MASK, status_reg);
 
@@ -341,7 +341,7 @@ static int __cxl_mem_mbox_send_cmd(struct cxl_mem *cxlm,
 	}
 
 	/* #7 */
-	cmd_reg = readq(cxlm->mbox_regs + CXLDEV_MBOX_CMD_OFFSET);
+	cmd_reg = readq(cxlm->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_CMD_OFFSET);
 	out_len = FIELD_GET(CXLDEV_MBOX_CMD_PAYLOAD_LENGTH_MASK, cmd_reg);
 
 	/* #8 */
@@ -402,7 +402,7 @@ static int cxl_mem_mbox_get(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
 		goto out;
 	}
 
-	md_status = readq(cxlm->memdev_regs + CXLMDEV_STATUS_OFFSET);
+	md_status = readq(cxlm->regs.memdev + CXLMDEV_STATUS_OFFSET);
 	if (!(md_status & CXLMDEV_MBOX_IF_READY && CXLMDEV_READY(md_status))) {
 		dev_err(dev, "mbox: reported doorbell ready, but not mbox ready\n");
 		rc = -EBUSY;
@@ -887,7 +887,7 @@ static int cxl_mem_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
 	int cap, cap_count;
 	u64 cap_array;
 
-	cap_array = readq(cxlm->regs + CXLDEV_CAP_ARRAY_OFFSET);
+	cap_array = readq(cxlm->base + CXLDEV_CAP_ARRAY_OFFSET);
 	if (FIELD_GET(CXLDEV_CAP_ARRAY_ID_MASK, cap_array) !=
 	    CXLDEV_CAP_ARRAY_CAP_ID)
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -900,25 +900,25 @@ static int cxl_mem_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
 		u16 cap_id;
 
 		cap_id = FIELD_GET(CXLDEV_CAP_HDR_CAP_ID_MASK,
-				   readl(cxlm->regs + cap * 0x10));
-		offset = readl(cxlm->regs + cap * 0x10 + 0x4);
-		register_block = cxlm->regs + offset;
+				   readl(cxlm->base + cap * 0x10));
+		offset = readl(cxlm->base + cap * 0x10 + 0x4);
+		register_block = cxlm->base + offset;
 
 		switch (cap_id) {
 		case CXLDEV_CAP_CAP_ID_DEVICE_STATUS:
 			dev_dbg(dev, "found Status capability (0x%x)\n", offset);
-			cxlm->status_regs = register_block;
+			cxlm->regs.status = register_block;
 			break;
 		case CXLDEV_CAP_CAP_ID_PRIMARY_MAILBOX:
 			dev_dbg(dev, "found Mailbox capability (0x%x)\n", offset);
-			cxlm->mbox_regs = register_block;
+			cxlm->regs.mbox = register_block;
 			break;
 		case CXLDEV_CAP_CAP_ID_SECONDARY_MAILBOX:
 			dev_dbg(dev, "found Secondary Mailbox capability (0x%x)\n", offset);
 			break;
 		case CXLDEV_CAP_CAP_ID_MEMDEV:
 			dev_dbg(dev, "found Memory Device capability (0x%x)\n", offset);
-			cxlm->memdev_regs = register_block;
+			cxlm->regs.memdev = register_block;
 			break;
 		default:
 			dev_dbg(dev, "Unknown cap ID: %d (0x%x)\n", cap_id, offset);
@@ -926,11 +926,11 @@ static int cxl_mem_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
 		}
 	}
 
-	if (!cxlm->status_regs || !cxlm->mbox_regs || !cxlm->memdev_regs) {
+	if (!cxlm->regs.status || !cxlm->regs.mbox || !cxlm->regs.memdev) {
 		dev_err(dev, "registers not found: %s%s%s\n",
-			!cxlm->status_regs ? "status " : "",
-			!cxlm->mbox_regs ? "mbox " : "",
-			!cxlm->memdev_regs ? "memdev" : "");
+			!cxlm->regs.status ? "status " : "",
+			!cxlm->regs.mbox ? "mbox " : "",
+			!cxlm->regs.memdev ? "memdev" : "");
 		return -ENXIO;
 	}
 
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@ static int cxl_mem_setup_regs(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
 
 static int cxl_mem_setup_mailbox(struct cxl_mem *cxlm)
 {
-	const int cap = readl(cxlm->mbox_regs + CXLDEV_MBOX_CAPS_OFFSET);
+	const int cap = readl(cxlm->regs.mbox + CXLDEV_MBOX_CAPS_OFFSET);
 
 	cxlm->payload_size =
 		1 << FIELD_GET(CXLDEV_MBOX_CAP_PAYLOAD_SIZE_MASK, cap);
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ static struct cxl_mem *cxl_mem_create(struct pci_dev *pdev, u32 reg_lo,
 
 	mutex_init(&cxlm->mbox_mutex);
 	cxlm->pdev = pdev;
-	cxlm->regs = regs + offset;
+	cxlm->base = regs + offset;
 	cxlm->enabled_cmds =
 		devm_kmalloc_array(dev, BITS_TO_LONGS(cxl_cmd_count),
 				   sizeof(unsigned long),
@@ -1525,6 +1525,10 @@ static __init int cxl_mem_init(void)
 	dev_t devt;
 	int rc;
 
+	/* Double check the anonymous union trickery in struct cxl_regs */
+	BUILD_BUG_ON(offsetof(struct cxl_regs, memdev) !=
+		     offsetof(struct cxl_regs, device_regs.memdev));
+
 	rc = alloc_chrdev_region(&devt, 0, CXL_MEM_MAX_DEVS, "cxl");
 	if (rc)
 		return rc;
diff --git a/drivers/cxl/mem.h b/drivers/cxl/mem.h
index 451db0984b92..0a3f70316872 100644
--- a/drivers/cxl/mem.h
+++ b/drivers/cxl/mem.h
@@ -49,10 +49,9 @@ struct cxl_memdev {
 /**
  * struct cxl_mem - A CXL memory device
  * @pdev: The PCI device associated with this CXL device.
- * @regs: IO mappings to the device's MMIO
- * @status_regs: CXL 2.0 8.2.8.3 Device Status Registers
- * @mbox_regs: CXL 2.0 8.2.8.4 Mailbox Registers
- * @memdev_regs: CXL 2.0 8.2.8.5 Memory Device Registers
+ * @base: IO mappings to the device's MMIO
+ * @cxlmd: Logical memory device chardev / interface
+ * @regs: Parsed register blocks
  * @payload_size: Size of space for payload
  *                (CXL 2.0 8.2.8.4.3 Mailbox Capabilities Register)
  * @mbox_mutex: Mutex to synchronize mailbox access.
@@ -63,12 +62,10 @@ struct cxl_memdev {
  */
 struct cxl_mem {
 	struct pci_dev *pdev;
-	void __iomem *regs;
+	void __iomem *base;
 	struct cxl_memdev *cxlmd;
 
-	void __iomem *status_regs;
-	void __iomem *mbox_regs;
-	void __iomem *memdev_regs;
+	struct cxl_regs regs;
 
 	size_t payload_size;
 	struct mutex mbox_mutex; /* Protects device mailbox and firmware */


  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-14  5:22 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-14  5:21 [PATCH v4 0/8] CXL Port Enumeration and Plans for v5.14 Dan Williams
2021-05-14  5:21 ` [PATCH v4 1/8] cxl/mem: Move some definitions to mem.h Dan Williams
2021-05-14  5:21 ` Dan Williams [this message]
2021-05-14  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 3/8] cxl/core: Rename bus.c to core.c Dan Williams
2021-05-14  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 4/8] cxl/core: Refactor CXL register lookup for bridge reuse Dan Williams
2021-05-14  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 5/8] cxl/acpi: Introduce ACPI0017 driver and cxl_root Dan Williams
2021-05-14  9:17   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-05-14 20:29     ` Dan Williams
2021-05-14 21:37     ` [PATCH v5 " Dan Williams
2021-05-14  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 6/8] cxl/Kconfig: Default drivers to CONFIG_CXL_BUS Dan Williams
2021-05-14  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 7/8] cxl/port: Introduce cxl_port objects Dan Williams
2021-05-14 22:54   ` [PATCH v5 " Dan Williams
2021-05-14  5:22 ` [PATCH v4 8/8] cxl/acpi: Add module parameters to stand in for ACPI tables Dan Williams

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=162096971451.1865304.13540251513463515153.stgit@dwillia2-desk3.amr.corp.intel.com \
    --to=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com \
    --cc=ben.widawsky@intel.com \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-cxl@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).