From: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
To: elver@google.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: glider@google.com, dvyukov@google.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org,
kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Subject: [PATCH] kfence: unconditionally use unbound work queue
Date: Fri, 21 May 2021 13:16:30 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210521111630.472579-1-elver@google.com> (raw)
Unconditionally use unbound work queue, and not just if
wq_power_efficient is true. Because if the system is idle, KFENCE may
wait, and by being run on the unbound work queue, we permit the
scheduler to make better scheduling decisions and not require pinning
KFENCE to the same CPU upon waking up.
Fixes: 36f0b35d0894 ("kfence: use power-efficient work queue to run delayed work")
Reported-by: Hillf Danton <hdanton@sina.com>
Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
---
mm/kfence/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/kfence/core.c b/mm/kfence/core.c
index 4d21ac44d5d3..d7666ace9d2e 100644
--- a/mm/kfence/core.c
+++ b/mm/kfence/core.c
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@ static void toggle_allocation_gate(struct work_struct *work)
/* Disable static key and reset timer. */
static_branch_disable(&kfence_allocation_key);
#endif
- queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &kfence_timer,
+ queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &kfence_timer,
msecs_to_jiffies(kfence_sample_interval));
}
static DECLARE_DELAYED_WORK(kfence_timer, toggle_allocation_gate);
@@ -666,7 +666,7 @@ void __init kfence_init(void)
}
WRITE_ONCE(kfence_enabled, true);
- queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq, &kfence_timer, 0);
+ queue_delayed_work(system_unbound_wq, &kfence_timer, 0);
pr_info("initialized - using %lu bytes for %d objects at 0x%p-0x%p\n", KFENCE_POOL_SIZE,
CONFIG_KFENCE_NUM_OBJECTS, (void *)__kfence_pool,
(void *)(__kfence_pool + KFENCE_POOL_SIZE));
--
2.31.1.818.g46aad6cb9e-goog
next reply other threads:[~2021-05-21 11:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-21 11:16 Marco Elver [this message]
2021-05-21 11:23 ` [PATCH] kfence: unconditionally use unbound work queue Alexander Potapenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20210521111630.472579-1-elver@google.com \
--to=elver@google.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=hdanton@sina.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).