linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
To: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie>, DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Cc: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@linaro.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
	Javier Martinez Canillas <javierm@redhat.com>,
	John Stultz <john.stultz@linaro.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the qcom/for-next tree
Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2021 17:38:14 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20210726163814.6483-1-broonie@kernel.org> (raw)

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/firmware/Makefile

between commit:

  b42000e4b874 ("firmware: qcom_scm: Allow qcom_scm driver to be loadable as a permenent module")

from the qcom/for-next tree and commits:

  8633ef82f101 ("drivers/firmware: consolidate EFI framebuffer setup for all arches")
  d391c5827107 ("drivers/firmware: move x86 Generic System Framebuffers support")

from the drm tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

diff --git a/drivers/firmware/Makefile b/drivers/firmware/Makefile
index 3c2af2e98def..5ced0673d94b 100644
--- a/drivers/firmware/Makefile
+++ b/drivers/firmware/Makefile
@@ -19,6 +19,8 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_RASPBERRYPI_FIRMWARE) += raspberrypi.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_FW_CFG_SYSFS)	+= qemu_fw_cfg.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_QCOM_SCM)		+= qcom-scm.o
 qcom-scm-objs += qcom_scm.o qcom_scm-smc.o qcom_scm-legacy.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SYSFB)		+= sysfb.o
+obj-$(CONFIG_SYSFB_SIMPLEFB)	+= sysfb_simplefb.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TI_SCI_PROTOCOL)	+= ti_sci.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TRUSTED_FOUNDATIONS) += trusted_foundations.o
 obj-$(CONFIG_TURRIS_MOX_RWTM)	+= turris-mox-rwtm.o

             reply	other threads:[~2021-07-26 16:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-07-26 16:38 Mark Brown [this message]
2021-09-02  1:44 ` linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with the qcom/for-next tree Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20210726163814.6483-1-broonie@kernel.org \
    --to=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=airlied@linux.ie \
    --cc=bjorn.andersson@linaro.org \
    --cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
    --cc=javierm@redhat.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).