From: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nfs@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: [PATCH 2.2.18pre21] Fix 3 leaks in lockd...
Date: Mon, 13 Nov 2000 20:24:59 +0100 (CET) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <14864.16395.652711.596971@charged.uio.no> (raw)
As usual, I messed up the list addresses. Here's a resend (not Cced to
Alan since he should already have received it).
Cheers,
Trond
Forwarded message ----------------------------------
Hi Alan,
The following patch fixes 3 leaks in the 2.2.18pre21 'lockd'
server:
- The nlm_host h_count leaks in nlm{,4}svc_callback(). This is due
to both nlmsvc_async_call() and the above functions incrementing
the h_count.
Backport the 2.4.0 definitions of nlm{clnt,svc}_async_call() in
order to fix problem and to avoid having different APIs in 2.2.x
and 2.4.x lockd.
Hopefully we can clean this entire mess out in 2.5.x.
- nlmsvc_share_file() increments the file->f_count. This causes a
file leak when using MSDOS-style shares.
Instead we should do as per the posix server code, and simply rely
on the lockd file garbage collectors to not close a file with
pending locks/shares/blocks.
- nlm{4,}svc_proc_sm_notify() should only call nlm_release_host()
when nlm_lookup_host() returns a non-null value.
Cheers,
Trond
diff -u --recursive --new-file linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/clntproc.c linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/clntproc.c
--- linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/clntproc.c Mon Nov 13 17:15:58 2000
+++ linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/clntproc.c Mon Nov 13 19:31:55 2000
@@ -309,16 +309,14 @@
/*
* Generic NLM call, async version.
*/
-static int
-_nlmclnt_async_call(struct nlm_rqst *req, u32 proc, rpc_action callback,
- struct rpc_cred *cred)
+int
+nlmsvc_async_call(struct nlm_rqst *req, u32 proc, rpc_action callback)
{
struct nlm_host *host = req->a_host;
struct rpc_clnt *clnt;
struct nlm_args *argp = &req->a_args;
struct nlm_res *resp = &req->a_res;
struct rpc_message msg;
- int status;
dprintk("lockd: call procedure %s on %s (async)\n",
nlm_procname(proc), host->h_name);
@@ -327,41 +325,47 @@
if ((clnt = nlm_bind_host(host)) == NULL)
return -ENOLCK;
- /* Increment host refcount */
- nlm_get_host(host);
-
- /* bootstrap and kick off the async RPC call */
+ /* bootstrap and kick off the async RPC call */
msg.rpc_proc = proc;
msg.rpc_argp = argp;
msg.rpc_resp =resp;
- msg.rpc_cred = cred;
- status = rpc_call_async(clnt, &msg, RPC_TASK_ASYNC, callback, req);
-
- if (status < 0)
- nlm_release_host(host);
- return status;
+ msg.rpc_cred = NULL;
+ return rpc_call_async(clnt, &msg, RPC_TASK_ASYNC, callback, req);
}
-
int
nlmclnt_async_call(struct nlm_rqst *req, u32 proc, rpc_action callback)
{
+ struct nlm_host *host = req->a_host;
+ struct rpc_clnt *clnt;
struct nlm_args *argp = &req->a_args;
- struct file *filp = argp->lock.fl.fl_file;
- struct rpc_cred *cred = NULL;
+ struct nlm_res *resp = &req->a_res;
+ struct file *file = argp->lock.fl.fl_file;
+ struct rpc_message msg;
+ int status;
- if (filp)
- cred = nfs_file_cred(filp);
+ dprintk("lockd: call procedure %s on %s (async)\n",
+ nlm_procname(proc), host->h_name);
- return _nlmclnt_async_call(req, proc, callback, cred);
-}
+ /* If we have no RPC client yet, create one. */
+ if ((clnt = nlm_bind_host(host)) == NULL)
+ return -ENOLCK;
-int
-nlmsvc_async_call(struct nlm_rqst *req, u32 proc, rpc_action callback)
-{
- return _nlmclnt_async_call(req, proc, callback, NULL);
+ /* bootstrap and kick off the async RPC call */
+ msg.rpc_proc = proc;
+ msg.rpc_argp = argp;
+ msg.rpc_resp =resp;
+ if (file)
+ msg.rpc_cred = nfs_file_cred(file);
+ else
+ msg.rpc_cred = NULL;
+ /* Increment host refcount */
+ nlm_get_host(host);
+ status = rpc_call_async(clnt, &msg, RPC_TASK_ASYNC, callback, req);
+ if (status < 0)
+ nlm_release_host(host);
+ return status;
}
-
/*
* TEST for the presence of a conflicting lock
diff -u --recursive --new-file linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c
--- linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c Mon Nov 13 17:15:58 2000
+++ linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/svc4proc.c Mon Nov 13 19:51:12 2000
@@ -450,8 +450,8 @@
if ((clnt = nlmsvc_ops->exp_getclient(&saddr)) != NULL
&& (host = nlm_lookup_host(clnt, &saddr, 0, 0)) != NULL) {
nlmsvc_free_host_resources(host);
+ nlm_release_host(host);
}
- nlm_release_host(host);
}
return rpc_success;
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
host = nlmclnt_lookup_host(&rqstp->rq_addr,
rqstp->rq_prot, rqstp->rq_vers);
if (!host) {
- rpc_free(call);
+ kfree(call);
return rpc_system_err;
}
@@ -481,9 +481,13 @@
memcpy(&call->a_args, resp, sizeof(*resp));
if (nlmsvc_async_call(call, proc, nlm4svc_callback_exit) < 0)
- return rpc_system_err;
+ goto error;
return rpc_success;
+ error:
+ kfree(call);
+ nlm_release_host(host);
+ return rpc_system_err;
}
static void
@@ -496,7 +500,7 @@
task->tk_pid, -task->tk_status);
}
nlm_release_host(call->a_host);
- rpc_free(call);
+ kfree(call);
}
/*
diff -u --recursive --new-file linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/svclock.c linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/svclock.c
--- linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/svclock.c Mon Nov 13 17:15:58 2000
+++ linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/svclock.c Mon Nov 13 19:49:12 2000
@@ -531,8 +531,10 @@
nlmsvc_insert_block(block, jiffies + 30 * HZ);
/* Call the client */
- nlmsvc_async_call(&block->b_call, NLMPROC_GRANTED_MSG,
- nlmsvc_grant_callback);
+ nlm_get_host(block->b_call.a_host);
+ if (nlmsvc_async_call(&block->b_call, NLMPROC_GRANTED_MSG,
+ nlmsvc_grant_callback) < 0)
+ nlm_release_host(block->b_call.a_host);
up(&file->f_sema);
}
diff -u --recursive --new-file linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/svcproc.c linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/svcproc.c
--- linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/svcproc.c Mon Nov 13 17:15:59 2000
+++ linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/svcproc.c Mon Nov 13 19:51:04 2000
@@ -463,8 +463,8 @@
if ((clnt = nlmsvc_ops->exp_getclient(&saddr)) != NULL
&& (host = nlm_lookup_host(clnt, &saddr, 0, 0)) != NULL) {
nlmsvc_free_host_resources(host);
+ nlm_release_host(host);
}
- nlm_release_host(host);
}
return rpc_success;
@@ -494,9 +494,13 @@
memcpy(&call->a_args, resp, sizeof(*resp));
if (nlmsvc_async_call(call, proc, nlmsvc_callback_exit) < 0)
- return rpc_system_err;
+ goto error;
return rpc_success;
+ error:
+ nlm_release_host(host);
+ kfree(call);
+ return rpc_system_err;
}
static void
diff -u --recursive --new-file linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/svcshare.c linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/svcshare.c
--- linux-2.2.18pre21/fs/lockd/svcshare.c Mon Nov 13 17:15:59 2000
+++ linux-2.2.18-fix_leak/fs/lockd/svcshare.c Mon Nov 13 19:07:12 2000
@@ -54,7 +54,6 @@
share->s_owner.len = oh->len;
share->s_next = file->f_shares;
file->f_shares = share;
- file->f_count += 1;
update:
share->s_access = argp->fsm_access;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
reply other threads:[~2000-11-13 21:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=14864.16395.652711.596971@charged.uio.no \
--to=trond.myklebust@fys.uio.no \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nfs@lists.sourceforge.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).