linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, mingo@elte.hu, paulus@samba.org,
	davem@davemloft.net, fweisbec@gmail.com, robert.richter@amd.com,
	perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net, eranian@gmail.com,
	eranian@google.com
Subject: [PATCH] perf_events: fix bug in AMD per-cpu initialization
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 10:40:01 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4ba0a646.25e2660a.1b25.531c@mx.google.com> (raw)

	On AMD processors, we need to allocate a data structure per Northbridge
	to handle certain events.

	On CPU initialization, we need to query the Northbridge id and check
	whether the structure is already allocated or not. We use the
	amd_get_nb_id() function to request the Northbridge identification.

	The recent cleanup of the CPU online/offline initialization introduced
	a bug. AMD cpu initialization is invoked on CPU_UP_PREPARE callback.
	This is before the CPU Northbridge id is calculated. Therefore no
	processor had a Northbridge structure allocated except the boot
	processor. That was causing bogus NB event scheduling.

	This patch uses the CPU_ONLINE callback to initialize the AMD
	Northbridge structure. This way amd_get_nb_id() returns valid
	information.

	The x86_cpu_up() callback was added. Could not call it cpu_online
	because of existing macro.

	Signed-off-by: Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>
	
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
index 978d297..016c25a 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event.c
@@ -213,6 +213,7 @@ struct x86_pmu {
 	void		(*quirks)(void);
 
 	void		(*cpu_prepare)(int cpu);
+	void		(*cpu_up)(int cpu);
 	void		(*cpu_starting)(int cpu);
 	void		(*cpu_dying)(int cpu);
 	void		(*cpu_dead)(int cpu);
@@ -1342,6 +1343,11 @@ x86_pmu_notifier(struct notifier_block *self, unsigned long action, void *hcpu)
 			x86_pmu.cpu_starting(cpu);
 		break;
 
+	case CPU_ONLINE:
+		if (x86_pmu.cpu_up)
+			x86_pmu.cpu_up(cpu);
+		break;
+
 	case CPU_DYING:
 		if (x86_pmu.cpu_dying)
 			x86_pmu.cpu_dying(cpu);
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
index 358a8e3..584df49 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_amd.c
@@ -346,6 +346,9 @@ static void amd_pmu_cpu_offline(int cpu)
 
 	cpuhw = &per_cpu(cpu_hw_events, cpu);
 
+	if (!cpuhw->amd_nb)
+		return;
+
 	raw_spin_lock(&amd_nb_lock);
 
 	if (--cpuhw->amd_nb->refcnt == 0)
@@ -379,7 +382,7 @@ static __initconst struct x86_pmu amd_pmu = {
 	.get_event_constraints	= amd_get_event_constraints,
 	.put_event_constraints	= amd_put_event_constraints,
 
-	.cpu_prepare		= amd_pmu_cpu_online,
+	.cpu_up			= amd_pmu_cpu_online,
 	.cpu_dead		= amd_pmu_cpu_offline,
 };
 

             reply	other threads:[~2010-03-17  9:52 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2010-03-17  8:40 Stephane Eranian [this message]
2010-03-17 23:47 ` [PATCH] perf_events: fix bug in AMD per-cpu initialization Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-18  0:33   ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-23 14:11     ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-23 14:55       ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-23 15:07         ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-23 15:12           ` Stephane Eranian
2010-03-23 15:18             ` Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-23 22:41               ` Stephane Eranian
2010-04-02 19:06       ` [tip:perf/core] x86: Move notify_cpu_starting() callback to a later stage tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-04-02 19:07       ` [tip:perf/core] perf, x86: Fix AMD hotplug & constraint initialization tip-bot for Peter Zijlstra
2010-03-24 13:45 [PATCH] perf_events: fix bug in AMD per-cpu initialization Stephane Eranian

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4ba0a646.25e2660a.1b25.531c@mx.google.com \
    --to=eranian@google.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=eranian@gmail.com \
    --cc=fweisbec@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@elte.hu \
    --cc=paulus@samba.org \
    --cc=perfmon2-devel@lists.sf.net \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=robert.richter@amd.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).