[CPUFREQ] Make powernow-k7 work with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR == m
diff mbox series

Message ID 20040603121704.GB8164@gondor.apana.org.au
State New, archived
Headers show
Series
  • [CPUFREQ] Make powernow-k7 work with CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR == m
Related show

Commit Message

Herbert Xu June 3, 2004, 12:17 p.m. UTC
Hi:

The last round of updates to powernow-k7.c broke it when
CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is built as a module.  This patch
fixes that.

Cheers,

Comments

Dave Jones June 3, 2004, 12:37 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:17:04PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
 > Hi:
 > 
 > The last round of updates to powernow-k7.c broke it when
 > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is built as a module.  This patch
 > fixes that.
 
How strange, I could swear I already merged this patch into
the last round that went to Linus.  I'll make sure it gets
into the next one. There's been some corruption with the
cpufreq -bk tree the last few days which has only just got
fixed up, so I'm a little behind on cpufreq patches.

		Dave

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Tony Lindgren June 3, 2004, 4:59 p.m. UTC | #2
* Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> [040603 05:38]:
> On Thu, Jun 03, 2004 at 10:17:04PM +1000, Herbert Xu wrote:
>  > Hi:
>  > 
>  > The last round of updates to powernow-k7.c broke it when
>  > CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR is built as a module.  This patch
>  > fixes that.
>  
> How strange, I could swear I already merged this patch into
> the last round that went to Linus.  I'll make sure it gets
> into the next one. There's been some corruption with the
> cpufreq -bk tree the last few days which has only just got
> fixed up, so I'm a little behind on cpufreq patches.

The Deja Vu was the same patch for powernow-k8.

Regards,

Tony
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Patch
diff mbox series

===== arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c 1.51 vs edited =====
--- 1.51/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c	2004-05-08 00:34:07 +10:00
+++ edited/arch/i386/kernel/cpu/cpufreq/powernow-k7.c	2004-06-03 22:11:08 +10:00
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ 
 #include <asm/io.h>
 #include <asm/system.h>
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR
+#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_MODULE)
 #include <linux/acpi.h>
 #include <acpi/processor.h>
 #endif
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@ 
 	u8 numpstates;
 };
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR
+#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_MODULE)
 union powernow_acpi_control_t {
 	struct {
 		unsigned long fid:5,
@@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ 
 }
 
 
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR
+#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_MODULE)
 
 struct acpi_processor_performance *acpi_processor_perf;
 
@@ -642,7 +642,7 @@ 
 
 static void __exit powernow_exit (void)
 {
-#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR
+#if defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR) || defined(CONFIG_ACPI_PROCESSOR_MODULE)
 	if (acpi_processor_perf) {
 		acpi_processor_unregister_performance(acpi_processor_perf, 0);
 		kfree(acpi_processor_perf);