From: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
To: "Jeffrey E. Hundstad" <jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>,
Steve Lord <lord@xfs.org>
Cc: linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com, xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com, nathans@sgi.com,
Cahya Wirawan <cwirawan@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 21:50:12 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040720195012.GN14733@fs.tum.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40FD2E99.20707@mnsu.edu>
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:39:21AM -0500, Jeffrey E. Hundstad wrote:
> Steve Lord wrote:
>
> >Don't use 4K stacks and XFS. What you hit here is a path where the
> >filesystem is getting full and it needs to free some reserved space
> >by flushing cached data which is using reserved extents. Reserved
> >extents do not yet have an on disk address and they include a
> >reservation for the worst case metadata usage. Flushing them will
> >get you room back.
> >
> >As you can see, it is a pretty deep call stack, most of XFS is going
> >to work just fine with a 4K stack, but there are end cases like
> >this one which will just not fit.
>
>
> If this is a known truth with XFS maybe it would be a good idea to have
> 4K stacks and XFS be an impossible combination using the config tool.
The patch below does:
1. let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL
Rationale:
4Kb stacks on i386 are the future. But currently this option might still
cause problems in some areas of the kernel. OTOH, 4Kb stacks isn't a big
gain for most people.
2.6 is a stable kernel series, and 4KSTACKS=n is the safe choice.
Once all issues with 4KSTACKS=y are resolved this can be reverted.
2. let XFS depend on (4KSTACKS=n || BROKEN)
Rationale:
Mark Loy said:
Don't use 4K stacks and XFS.
Mark this combination as BROKEN until XFS is fixed.
This might result in XFS support disappearing for some people, but if
they use EXPERIMENTAL=y they should know what they are doing.
The 4KSTACKS option has to be moved for that it's asked before XFS in
"make config".
diffstat output:
arch/i386/Kconfig | 19 ++++++++++---------
fs/Kconfig | 1 +
2 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@fs.tum.de>
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2-full/arch/i386/Kconfig.old 2004-07-20 21:00:32.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-full/arch/i386/Kconfig 2004-07-20 21:03:30.000000000 +0200
@@ -865,6 +865,16 @@
generate incorrect output with certain kernel constructs when
-mregparm=3 is used.
+config 4KSTACKS
+ bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb"
+ depends on EXPERIMENTAL
+ help
+ If you say Y here the kernel will use a 4Kb stacksize for the
+ kernel stack attached to each process/thread. This facilitates
+ running more threads on a system and also reduces the pressure
+ on the VM subsystem for higher order allocations. This option
+ will also use IRQ stacks to compensate for the reduced stackspace.
+
endmenu
@@ -1289,15 +1299,6 @@
If you don't debug the kernel, you can say N, but we may not be able
to solve problems without frame pointers.
-config 4KSTACKS
- bool "Use 4Kb for kernel stacks instead of 8Kb"
- help
- If you say Y here the kernel will use a 4Kb stacksize for the
- kernel stack attached to each process/thread. This facilitates
- running more threads on a system and also reduces the pressure
- on the VM subsystem for higher order allocations. This option
- will also use IRQ stacks to compensate for the reduced stackspace.
-
config X86_FIND_SMP_CONFIG
bool
depends on X86_LOCAL_APIC || X86_VOYAGER
--- linux-2.6.8-rc2-full/fs/Kconfig.old 2004-07-20 21:04:02.000000000 +0200
+++ linux-2.6.8-rc2-full/fs/Kconfig 2004-07-20 21:04:25.000000000 +0200
@@ -294,6 +294,7 @@
config XFS_FS
tristate "XFS filesystem support"
+ depends on (4KSTACKS=n || BROKEN)
help
XFS is a high performance journaling filesystem which originated
on the SGI IRIX platform. It is completely multi-threaded, can
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-07-20 19:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-07-20 11:44 4K stack kernel get Oops in Filesystem stress test Cahya Wirawan
2004-07-20 12:04 ` Steve Lord
2004-07-20 14:39 ` Jeffrey E. Hundstad
2004-07-20 19:50 ` Adrian Bunk [this message]
2004-07-20 20:42 ` [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-20 20:50 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-20 20:58 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-29 6:09 ` Nathan Scott
2004-07-29 11:42 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-29 11:46 ` Arjan van de Ven
2004-07-29 21:11 ` Adrian Bunk
2004-07-29 21:44 ` Chris Wedgwood
2004-07-29 22:30 ` [xfs-masters] " Nathan Scott
2004-08-01 19:02 ` [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL Adrian Bunk
2004-07-29 15:42 ` [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS=n Mika Bostrom
2004-07-29 16:09 ` Zwane Mwaikambo
2004-07-29 16:36 ` [2.6 patch] let 4KSTACKS depend on EXPERIMENTAL and XFS on 4KSTACKS Mika Bostrom
2004-07-22 7:27 ` 4K stack kernel get Oops in Filesystem stress test Amon Ott
2004-07-29 2:14 ` Nathan Scott
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040720195012.GN14733@fs.tum.de \
--to=bunk@fs.tum.de \
--cc=akpm@osdl.org \
--cc=cwirawan@email.archlab.tuwien.ac.at \
--cc=jeffrey.hundstad@mnsu.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@oss.sgi.com \
--cc=lord@xfs.org \
--cc=nathans@sgi.com \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
--cc=xfs-masters@oss.sgi.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).