[3.12,74/82] i2c: mv64xxx: refactor message start to ensure proper initialization
diff mbox series

Message ID 20140220235021.701011869@linuxfoundation.org
State New, archived
Headers show
Series
  • 3.12.13-stable review
Related show

Commit Message

Greg KH Feb. 20, 2014, 11:52 p.m. UTC
3.12-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>

commit 79970db213344b4a4034645db5ebfc31571f3fa3 upstream.

Because the offload mechanism can fall back to a standard transfer,
having two seperate initialization states is unfortunate. Let's just
have one state which does things consistently. This fixes a bug where
some preparation was missing when the fallback happened. And it makes
the code much easier to follow. To implement this, we put the check
if offload is possible at the top of the offload setup function.

Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Tested-by: Gregory CLEMENT <gregory.clement@free-electrons.com>
Fixes: 930ab3d403ae (i2c: mv64xxx: Add I2C Transaction Generator support)
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c |   33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Patch
diff mbox series

--- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
+++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-mv64xxx.c
@@ -97,7 +97,6 @@  enum {
 enum {
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_INVALID,
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_CONTINUE,
-	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START,
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START,
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_RESTART,
 	MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_RESTART,
@@ -204,6 +203,9 @@  static int mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(struc
 	unsigned long ctrl_reg;
 	struct i2c_msg *msg = drv_data->msgs;
 
+	if (!drv_data->offload_enabled)
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
 	drv_data->msg = msg;
 	drv_data->byte_posn = 0;
 	drv_data->bytes_left = msg->len;
@@ -433,8 +435,7 @@  mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c
 
 		drv_data->msgs++;
 		drv_data->num_msgs--;
-		if (!(drv_data->offload_enabled &&
-				mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data))) {
+		if (mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data) < 0) {
 			drv_data->cntl_bits |= MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START;
 			writel(drv_data->cntl_bits,
 			drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
@@ -458,15 +459,14 @@  mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(struct mv64xxx_i2c
 			drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
 		break;
 
-	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START:
-		if (!mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data))
-			break;
-		else
-			drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
-		/* FALLTHRU */
 	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START:
-		writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START,
-			drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
+		/* Can we offload this msg ? */
+		if (mv64xxx_i2c_offload_msg(drv_data) < 0) {
+			/* No, switch to standard path */
+			mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, drv_data->msgs);
+			writel(drv_data->cntl_bits | MV64XXX_I2C_REG_CONTROL_START,
+				drv_data->reg_base + drv_data->reg_offsets.control);
+		}
 		break;
 
 	case MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1:
@@ -625,15 +625,10 @@  mv64xxx_i2c_execute_msg(struct mv64xxx_i
 	unsigned long	flags;
 
 	spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_data->lock, flags);
-	if (drv_data->offload_enabled) {
-		drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_OFFLOAD_SEND_START;
-		drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
-	} else {
-		mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, msg);
 
-		drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
-		drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
-	}
+	drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
+	drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
+
 	drv_data->send_stop = is_last;
 	drv_data->block = 1;
 	mv64xxx_i2c_do_action(drv_data);