linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
To: yuyang.du@intel.com, peterz@infradead.org
Cc: mingo@redhat.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pjt@google.com,
	bsegall@google.com, arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com,
	len.brown@intel.com, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
	alan.cox@intel.com, mark.gross@intel.com, engguang.wu@intel.com,
	morten.rasmussen@arm.com,
	Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
Subject: 
Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2014 11:40:41 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1406799641-9462-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20140729015344.GF5203@intel.com>

Hi Yuyang,

Does something like the patch below to be applied of top of your patchset, seem
reasonable add-on?

It adds 1 new usage_sum statistics which is something that I use to detect the
overload of a rq in my patchset that reworks cpu_power and removes
capacity_factor

And I think that the change I made on load_sum should match some of Morten's
concerns

Regards,
Vincent

---
Subject: [PATCH] sched: add usage_sum statistic

Add a new statitic that reflects the average time a task is running on CPU.

load_sum is now the average runnable time before being weighted

The sum of usage_sum of the tasks that are on a rq, is used to detect
the overload of a rq.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>
---
 include/linux/sched.h |  1 +
 kernel/sched/fair.c   | 47 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 kernel/sched/sched.h  |  2 ++
 3 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/sched.h b/include/linux/sched.h
index b6617a1..3296e76 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched.h
@@ -1080,6 +1080,7 @@ struct sched_avg {
 	 */
 	u64 last_update_time;
 	u64 load_sum;
+	unsigned long usage_sum;
 	unsigned long load_avg;
 	u32 period_contrib;
 };
diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
index a3a3168..78408a0 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
@@ -679,7 +679,8 @@ void init_task_runnable_average(struct task_struct *p)
 	 */
 	sa->period_contrib = 1023;
 	sa->load_avg = p->se.load.weight;
-	sa->load_sum = p->se.load.weight * LOAD_AVG_MAX;
+	sa->load_sum = sa->usage_sum = LOAD_AVG_MAX;
+	;
 	/* when this task enqueue'ed, it will contribute to its cfs_rq's load_avg */
 }
 #else
@@ -2300,7 +2301,7 @@ static u32 __compute_runnable_contrib(u64 n)
  *            = u_0 + u_1*y + u_2*y^2 + ... [re-labeling u_i --> u_{i+1}]
  */
 static __always_inline int
-__update_load_avg(u64 now, struct sched_avg *sa, unsigned long w)
+__update_load_avg(u64 now, struct sched_avg *sa, unsigned long w, int running)
 {
 	u64 delta, periods;
 	u32 contrib;
@@ -2340,7 +2341,9 @@ __update_load_avg(u64 now, struct sched_avg *sa, unsigned long w)
 		 */
 		delta_w = 1024 - delta_w;
 		if (w)
-			sa->load_sum += w * delta_w;
+			sa->load_sum += delta_w;
+		if (running)
+			sa->usage_sum += delta_w;
 
 		delta -= delta_w;
 
@@ -2349,21 +2352,26 @@ __update_load_avg(u64 now, struct sched_avg *sa, unsigned long w)
 		delta %= 1024;
 
 		sa->load_sum = decay_load(sa->load_sum, periods + 1);
+		sa->usage_sum = decay_load(sa->usage_sum, periods + 1);
 
 		/* Efficiently calculate \sum (1..n_period) 1024*y^i */
 		contrib = __compute_runnable_contrib(periods);
 		if (w)
-			sa->load_sum += w * contrib;
+			sa->load_sum += contrib;
+		if (running)
+			sa->usage_sum += contrib;
 	}
 
 	/* Remainder of delta accrued against u_0` */
 	if (w)
-		sa->load_sum += w * delta;
+		sa->load_sum +=  delta;
+	if (running)
+		sa->usage_sum += delta;
 
 	sa->period_contrib += delta;
 
 	if (decayed)
-		sa->load_avg = div_u64(sa->load_sum, LOAD_AVG_MAX);
+		sa->load_avg = div_u64(sa->load_sum * w, LOAD_AVG_MAX);
 
 	return decayed;
 }
@@ -2404,11 +2412,17 @@ static inline int update_cfs_rq_load_avg(u64 now, struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 	if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg)) {
 		long r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg, 0);
 		cfs_rq->avg.load_avg = subtract_until_zero(cfs_rq->avg.load_avg, r);
-		r *= LOAD_AVG_MAX;
+	}
+	if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_load_sum)) {
+		long r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_load_sum, 0);
 		cfs_rq->avg.load_sum = subtract_until_zero(cfs_rq->avg.load_sum, r);
 	}
+	if (atomic_long_read(&cfs_rq->removed_usage_sum)) {
+		long r = atomic_long_xchg(&cfs_rq->removed_usage_sum, 0);
+		cfs_rq->avg.usage_sum = subtract_until_zero(cfs_rq->avg.usage_sum, r);
+	}
 
-	decayed = __update_load_avg(now, &cfs_rq->avg, cfs_rq->load.weight);
+	decayed = __update_load_avg(now, &cfs_rq->avg, cfs_rq->load.weight, cfs_rq->curr != NULL);
 
 #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
 	if (cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time != cfs_rq->load_last_update_time_copy) {
@@ -2430,7 +2444,8 @@ static inline void update_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se, int update_tg)
 	 * Track task load average for carrying it to new CPU after migrated,
 	 * and group sched_entity for task_h_load calc in migration
 	 */
-	__update_load_avg(now, &se->avg, se->on_rq * se->load.weight);
+	__update_load_avg(now, &se->avg, se->on_rq * se->load.weight,
+			entity_is_task(se) ? task_of(se)->on_cpu : 0);
 
 	if (update_cfs_rq_load_avg(now, cfs_rq) && update_tg)
 		update_tg_load_avg(cfs_rq);
@@ -2451,13 +2466,14 @@ static inline void enqueue_entity_load_avg(struct sched_entity *se)
 			migrated = 1;
 	}
 	else
-		__update_load_avg(now, sa, se->on_rq * se->load.weight);
+		__update_load_avg(now, sa, se->on_rq * se->load.weight, entity_is_task(se) ? task_of(se)->on_cpu : 0);
 
 	decayed = update_cfs_rq_load_avg(now, cfs_rq);
 
 	if (migrated) {
 		cfs_rq->avg.load_avg += sa->load_avg;
 		cfs_rq->avg.load_sum += sa->load_sum;
+		cfs_rq->avg.usage_sum += sa->usage_sum;
 	}
 
 	if (decayed || migrated)
@@ -4442,8 +4458,10 @@ migrate_task_rq_fair(struct task_struct *p, int next_cpu)
 #else
 	last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
 #endif
-	__update_load_avg(last_update_time, &se->avg, 0);
+	__update_load_avg(last_update_time, &se->avg, 0, p->on_cpu);
 	atomic_long_add(se->avg.load_avg, &cfs_rq->removed_load_avg);
+	atomic_long_add(se->avg.load_sum, &cfs_rq->removed_load_sum);
+	atomic_long_add(se->avg.usage_sum, &cfs_rq->removed_usage_sum);
 
 	/*
 	 * We are supposed to update the task to "current" time, then its up to date
@@ -7316,11 +7334,13 @@ static void switched_from_fair(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p)
 	* Remove our load from contribution when we leave cfs_rq.
 	*/
 	__update_load_avg(cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time, &se->avg,
-		se->on_rq * se->load.weight);
+		se->on_rq * se->load.weight, p->on_cpu);
 	cfs_rq->avg.load_avg =
 		subtract_until_zero(cfs_rq->avg.load_avg, se->avg.load_avg);
 	cfs_rq->avg.load_sum =
 		subtract_until_zero(cfs_rq->avg.load_sum, se->avg.load_sum);
+	cfs_rq->avg.usage_sum =
+		subtract_until_zero(cfs_rq->avg.usage_sum, se->avg.usage_sum);
 #endif
 }
 
@@ -7378,6 +7398,8 @@ void init_cfs_rq(struct cfs_rq *cfs_rq)
 #endif
 #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
 	atomic_long_set(&cfs_rq->removed_load_avg, 0);
+	atomic_long_set(&cfs_rq->removed_load_sum, 0);
+	atomic_long_set(&cfs_rq->removed_usage_sum, 0);
 #endif
 }
 
@@ -7428,6 +7450,7 @@ static void task_move_group_fair(struct task_struct *p, int on_rq)
 		p->se.avg.last_update_time = cfs_rq->avg.last_update_time;
 		cfs_rq->avg.load_avg += p->se.avg.load_avg;
 		cfs_rq->avg.load_sum += p->se.avg.load_sum;
+		cfs_rq->avg.usage_sum += p->se.avg.usage_sum;
 #endif
 	}
 }
diff --git a/kernel/sched/sched.h b/kernel/sched/sched.h
index f21ddde..1bdd878 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/sched.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/sched.h
@@ -335,6 +335,8 @@ struct cfs_rq {
 	struct sched_avg avg;
 	unsigned long tg_load_avg_contrib;
 	atomic_long_t removed_load_avg;
+	atomic_long_t removed_load_sum;
+	atomic_long_t removed_usage_sum;
 #ifndef CONFIG_64BIT
 	u64 load_last_update_time_copy;
 #endif
-- 
1.9.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-07-31  9:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-07-17 23:26 [PATCH 0/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Yuyang Du
2014-07-17 23:26 ` [PATCH 1/2 v4] sched: Remove update_rq_runnable_avg Yuyang Du
2014-07-17 23:26 ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Yuyang Du
2014-07-18  9:43   ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-27 17:36     ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29  9:12       ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-29  1:43         ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:17           ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-29 22:27             ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-30  8:30               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-30  0:40                 ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29  9:39         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  1:53           ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:35             ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 15:55               ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29 23:08               ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-31  9:40             ` Vincent Guittot [this message]
2014-07-31  9:56             ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average Vincent Guittot
2014-07-31 19:16               ` Yuyang Du
2014-08-01  9:28                 ` Vincent Guittot
2014-07-28 10:48   ` [PATCH 2/2 v4] sched: Rewrite per entity runnable load average tracking Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  0:56     ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:15       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 11:39   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  1:09     ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 12:01   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 13:51   ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-28 16:58     ` bsegall
2014-07-28 17:19       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  1:13         ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-18 15:39 ` [PATCH 0/2 " Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-27 19:02   ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-28 10:38     ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-29  1:17       ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-29 13:06         ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-30 10:13     ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-30 10:21       ` Peter Zijlstra
2014-07-30 10:57         ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-30 19:17       ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-31  8:54         ` Morten Rasmussen
2014-07-31  2:15           ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-20  5:46 ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-27 19:34   ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-28  7:49     ` Mike Galbraith
2014-07-28  0:01       ` Yuyang Du
2014-07-28  8:55     ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1406799641-9462-1-git-send-email-vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --to=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
    --cc=alan.cox@intel.com \
    --cc=arjan.van.de.ven@intel.com \
    --cc=bsegall@google.com \
    --cc=engguang.wu@intel.com \
    --cc=len.brown@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=morten.rasmussen@arm.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=pjt@google.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=yuyang.du@intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).