linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>,
	Alexandre Courbot <gnurou@gmail.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>,
	Bryan Wu <cooloney@gmail.com>, Lee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@linaro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties
Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2014 04:11:20 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5597683.oi0VxOogFu@vostro.rjw.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1852462.V1jlbi8OPt@vostro.rjw.lan>

From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>

This document describes the data format and interfaces of ACPI device
specific properties.

Signed-off-by: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
---
 Documentation/acpi/properties.txt | 410 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 410 insertions(+)
 create mode 100644 Documentation/acpi/properties.txt

diff --git a/Documentation/acpi/properties.txt b/Documentation/acpi/properties.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..13a93c5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/acpi/properties.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,410 @@
+ACPI device properties
+======================
+This document describes the format and interfaces of ACPI device
+properties as specified in "Device Properties UUID For _DSD" available
+here:
+
+http://www.uefi.org/sites/default/files/resources/_DSD-device-properties-UUID.pdf
+
+1. Introduction
+---------------
+In systems that use ACPI and want to take advantage of device specific
+properties, there needs to be a standard way to return and extract
+name-value pairs for a given ACPI device.
+
+An ACPI device that wants to export its properties must implement a
+static name called _DSD that takes no arguments and returns a package of
+packages:
+
+	Name (_DSD, Package () {
+		ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
+		Package () {
+			Package () {"name1", <VALUE1>},
+			Package () {"name2", <VALUE2>}
+		}
+	})
+
+The UUID identifies contents of the following package. In case of ACPI
+device properties it is daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301.
+
+In each returned package, the first item is the name and must be a string.
+The corresponding value can be a string, integer, reference, or package. If
+a package it may only contain strings, integers, and references.
+
+An example device where we might need properties is a device that uses
+GPIOs. In addition to the GpioIo/GpioInt resources the driver needs to
+know which GPIO is used for which purpose.
+
+To solve this we add the following ACPI device properties to the device:
+
+	Device (DEV0)
+	{
+		Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () {
+			GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly,
+				"\\_SB.PCI0.LPC", 0, ResourceConsumer) {0}
+			GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly,
+				"\\_SB.PCI0.LPC", 0, ResourceConsumer) {1}
+			...
+		})
+
+		Name (_DSD, Package () {
+			ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
+			Package () {
+				Package () {"reset-gpio", {^DEV0, 0, 0, 0}},
+				Package () {"shutdown-gpio", {^DEV0, 1, 0, 0}},
+			}
+		})
+	}
+
+Now the device driver can reference the GPIOs using names instead of
+using indexes.
+
+If there is an existing Device Tree binding for a device, it is expected
+that the same bindings are used with ACPI properties, so that the driver
+dealing with the device needs only minor modifications if any.
+
+2. Formal definition of properties
+----------------------------------
+The following chapters define the currently supported properties. For
+these there exists a helper function that can be used to extract the
+property value.
+
+2.1 Integer types
+-----------------
+ACPI integers are always 64-bit. However, for drivers the full range is
+typically not needed so we provide a set of functions which convert the
+64-bit integer to a smaller Linux integer type.
+
+An integer property looks like this:
+
+	Package () {"i2c-sda-hold-time-ns", 300},
+	Package () {"clock-frequency", 400000},
+
+To read a property value, use a unified property accessor as shown
+below:
+
+	u32 val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = device_property_read_u32(dev, "clock-frequency", &val);
+	if (ret)
+		/* Handle error */
+
+The function returns 0 if the property is copied to 'val' or negative
+errno if something went wrong (or the property does not exist).
+
+2.2 Integer arrays
+------------------
+An integer array is a package holding only integers. Arrays can be used to
+represent different things like Linux input key codes to GPIO mappings, pin
+control settings, dma request lines, etc.
+
+An integer array looks like this:
+
+	Package () {
+		"max8952,dvs-mode-microvolt",
+		Package () {
+			1250000,
+			1200000,
+			1050000,
+			950000,
+		}
+	}
+
+The above array property can be accessed like:
+
+	u32 voltages[4];
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = device_property_read_u32_array(dev, "max8952,dvs-mode-microvolt",
+					     voltages, ARRAY_SIZE(voltages));
+	if (ret)
+		/* Handle error */
+
+
+All functions copy the resulting values cast to a requested type to the
+caller supplied array. If you pass NULL in the value pointer ('voltages' in
+this case), the function returns number of items in the array. This can be
+useful if caller does not know size of the array beforehand.
+
+2.3 Strings
+-----------
+String properties can be used to describe many things like labels for GPIO
+buttons, compability ids, etc.
+
+A string property looks like this:
+
+	Package () {"pwm-names", "backlight"},
+	Package () {"label", "Status-LED"},
+
+You can use device_property_read_string() to extract strings:
+
+	const char *val;
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = device_property_read_string(dev, "label", &val);
+	if (ret)
+		/* Handle error */
+
+Note that the function does not copy the returned string but instead the
+value is modified to point to the string property itself.
+
+The memory is owned by the associated ACPI device object and released
+when it is removed. The user need not free the associated memory.
+
+2.4 String arrays
+-----------------
+String arrays can be useful in describing a list of labels, names for
+DMA channels, etc.
+
+A string array property looks like this:
+
+	Package () {"dma-names", Package () {"tx", "rx", "rx-tx"}},
+	Package () {"clock-output-names", Package () {"pll", "pll-switched"}},
+
+And these can be read in similar way that the integer arrrays:
+
+	const char *dma_names[3];
+	int ret;
+
+	ret = device_property_read_string_array(dev, "dma-names", dma_names,
+						ARRAY_SIZE(dma_names));
+	if (ret)
+		/* Handle error */
+
+The memory management rules follow what is specified for single strings.
+Specifically the returned pointers should be treated as constant and not to
+be freed. That is done automatically when the correspondig ACPI device
+object is released.
+
+2.5 Object references
+---------------------
+An ACPI object reference is used to refer to some object in the
+namespace. For example, if a device has dependencies with some other
+object, an object reference can be used.
+
+An object reference looks like this:
+
+	Package () {"dev0", \_SB.DEV0},
+
+At the time of writing this, there is no unified device_property_* accessor
+for references so one needs to use the following ACPI helper function:
+
+	int acpi_dev_get_property_reference(struct acpi_device *adev,
+					    const char *name,
+					    const char *size_prop, int index,
+					    struct acpi_reference_args *args);
+
+The referenced ACPI device is returned in args->adev if found.
+
+In addition to simple object references it is also possible to have object
+references with arguments. These are represented in ASL as follows:
+
+	Device (\_SB.PCI0.PWM)
+	{
+		Name (_DSD, Package () {
+			ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
+			Package () {
+				Package () {"#pwm-cells", 2}
+			}
+		})
+	}
+
+	Device (\_SB.PCI0.BL)
+	{
+		Name (_DSD, Package () {
+			ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
+			Package () {
+				Package () {
+					"pwms",
+					Package () {
+						\_SB.PCI0.PWM, 0, 5000000,
+						\_SB.PCI0.PWM, 1, 4500000,
+					}
+				}
+			}
+		})
+	}
+
+In the above example, the referenced device declares a property that
+returns the number of expected arguments (here it is "#pwm-cells"). If
+no such property is given we assume that all the integers following the
+reference are arguments.
+
+In the above example PWM device expects 2 additional arguments. This
+will be validated by the ACPI property core.
+
+The additional arguments must be integers. Nothing else is supported.
+
+It is possible, as in the above example, to have multiple references
+with varying number of integer arguments. It is up to the referenced
+device to declare how many arguments it expects. The 'index' parameter
+selects which reference is returned.
+
+One can use acpi_dev_get_property_reference() as well to extract the
+information in additional parameters:
+
+	struct acpi_reference_args args;
+	struct acpi_device *adev = /* this will point to the BL device */
+	int ret;
+
+	/* extract the first reference */
+	acpi_dev_get_property_reference(adev, "pwms", "#pwm-cells", 0, &args);
+
+	BUG_ON(args.nargs != 2);
+	BUG_ON(args.args[0] != 0);
+	BUG_ON(args.args[1] != 5000000);
+
+	/* extract the second reference */
+	acpi_dev_get_property_reference(adev, "pwms", "#pwm-cells", 1, &args);
+
+	BUG_ON(args.nargs != 2);
+	BUG_ON(args.args[0] != 1);
+	BUG_ON(args.args[1] != 4500000);
+
+In addition to arguments, args.adev now points to the ACPI device that
+corresponds to \_SB.PCI0.PWM.
+
+It is intended that this function is not used directly but instead
+subsystems like pwm implement their ACPI support on top of this function
+in such way that it is hidden from the client drivers, such as via
+pwm_get().
+
+3. Device property hierarchies
+------------------------------
+Devices are organized in a tree within the Linux kernel. It follows that
+the configuration data would also be hierarchical. In order to reach
+equivalence with Device Tree, the ACPI mechanism must also provide some
+sort of tree-like representation. Fortunately, the ACPI namespace is
+already such a structure.
+
+For example, we could have the following device in ACPI namespace. The
+KEYS device is much like gpio_keys_polled.c in that it includes "pseudo"
+devices for each GPIO:
+
+	Device (KEYS)
+	{
+		Name (_CRS, ResourceTemplate () {
+			GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly,
+				"\\_SB.PCI0.LPC", 0, ResourceConsumer) {0}
+			GpioIo (Exclusive, PullUp, 0, 0, IoRestrictionInputOnly,
+				"\\_SB.PCI0.LPC", 0, ResourceConsumer) {1}
+			...
+		})
+
+		// "pseudo" devices declared under the parent device
+		Device (BTN0) {
+			Name (_DSD, Package () {
+				ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
+				Package () {
+					Package () {"label", "minnow_btn0"}
+					Package () {"gpios", Package () {^KEYS, 0, 0, 1}}
+				}
+			})
+		}
+
+		Device (BTN1) {
+			Name (_DSD, Package () {
+				ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
+				Package () {
+					Package () {"label", "minnow_btn1"}
+					Package () {"gpios", Package () {^KEYS, 1, 0, 1}}
+				}
+			})
+		}
+	}
+
+We can extract the above in gpio_keys_polled.c like:
+
+	static int gpio_keys_polled_create_button(struct device *dev, void *child,
+						  void *data)
+	{
+		struct button_data *bdata = data;
+		const char *label = NULL;
+
+		/*
+		 * We need to use device_child_ variant here to access
+		 * properties of the child.
+		 */
+		device_child_property_read_string(dev, child, "label", &label);
+		/* and so on */
+	}
+
+	static void gpio_keys_polled_probe(struct device *dev)
+	{
+		/* Properties for the KEYS device itself */
+		device_property_read(dev, ...);
+
+		/*
+		 * Iterate over button devices and extract their
+		 * firmware configuration.
+		 */
+		ret = device_for_each_child_node(dev, gpio_keys_polled_create_button,
+						 &bdata);
+		if (ret)
+			/* Handle error */
+	}
+
+Note that you still need proper error handling which is omitted in the
+above example.
+
+4. Existing Device Tree enabled drivers
+---------------------------------------
+At the time of writing this, there are ~250 existing DT enabled drivers.
+Allocating _HID/_CID for each would not be feasible. To make sure that
+those drivers can still be used on ACPI systems, we provide an
+alternative way to get these matched.
+
+There is a special _HID "PRP0001" which means that use the DT bindings
+for matching this device to a driver. The driver needs to have
+.of_match_table filled in even when !CONFIG_OF.
+
+An example device would be leds that can be controlled via GPIOs. This
+is represented as "leds-gpio" device and looks like this in the ACPI
+namespace:
+
+	Device (LEDS)
+	{
+		Name (_DSD, Package () {
+			ToUUID("daffd814-6eba-4d8c-8a91-bc9bbf4aa301"),
+			Package () {
+				Package () {"compatible", Package () {"gpio-leds"}},
+			}
+		})
+		...
+	}
+
+In order to get the existing drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c bound to this
+device, we take advantage of "PRP0001":
+
+	/* Following already exists in the driver */
+	static const struct of_device_id of_gpio_leds_match[] = {
+		{ .compatible = "gpio-leds", },
+		{},
+	};
+	MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, of_gpio_leds_match);
+
+	/* This we add to the driver to get it probed */
+	static const struct acpi_device_id acpi_gpio_leds_match[] = {
+		{ "PRP0001" }, /* Device Tree shoehorned into ACPI */
+		{},
+	};
+	MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(acpi, acpi_gpio_leds_match);
+
+	static struct platform_driver gpio_led_driver = {
+		.driver = {
+			/*
+			 * No of_match_ptr() here because we want this
+			 * table to be visible even when !CONFIG_OF to
+			 * match against "compatible" in _DSD.
+			 */
+			.of_match_table = of_gpio_leds_match,
+			.acpi_match_table = acpi_gpio_leds_match,
+		},
+	};
+
+Once ACPI core sees "PRP0001" and that the device has "compatible"
+property it will do the match using .of_match_table instead.
+
+It is preferred that new devices get a proper _HID allocated for them
+instead of inventing new DT "compatible" devices.
-- 
1.9.3


--G44BJl3Aq1QbV/QL--



  parent reply	other threads:[~2014-10-01  2:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 130+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2014-09-16 11:52 [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 01/16] ACPI: Add support for device specific properties Mika Westerberg
2014-10-06 13:50   ` Grant Likely
2014-10-06 14:32     ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-06 16:25       ` Darren Hart
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 02/16] Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Mika Westerberg
2014-09-17 18:28   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 03/16] ACPI: Allow drivers to match using Device Tree compatible property Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 04/16] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 05/16] mfd: Add ACPI support Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 21:54   ` Lee Jones
2014-09-24 12:00   ` Lee Jones
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 06/16] gpio / ACPI: Add support for _DSD device properties Mika Westerberg
2014-09-23 15:27   ` Linus Walleij
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 07/16] gpio: Add support for unified device properties interface Mika Westerberg
2014-09-23 15:25   ` Linus Walleij
2014-09-23 15:45     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-23 15:52       ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-23 16:17         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-09-23 20:31           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-23 16:25       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-23 16:26         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-23 20:47           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-24  7:55             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-24 14:08               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-23 21:15           ` Darren Hart
2014-09-24  9:12             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-24  9:38               ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-24 14:11                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-26  3:21               ` Darren Hart
2014-09-26  8:36                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-09-26 14:42                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-07 13:37                 ` Linus Walleij
2014-10-07 15:37                   ` Andy Shevchenko
2014-10-07 23:57                   ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 08/16] gpio: sch: Consolidate core and resume banks Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 09/16] leds: leds-gpio: Add support for GPIO descriptors Mika Westerberg
2014-09-19  8:18   ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-09-24  7:55   ` Linus Walleij
2014-09-24  9:42     ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 10/16] leds: leds-gpio: Make use of device property API Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 11/16] leds: leds-gpio: Add ACPI probing support Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 12/16] input: gpio_keys_polled - Add support for GPIO descriptors Mika Westerberg
2014-09-19  8:22   ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-09-24  8:02   ` Linus Walleij
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 13/16] input: gpio_keys_polled - Make use of device property API Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 14/16] input: gpio_keys_polled - Add ACPI probing support Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 15/16] misc: at25: Make use of device property API Mika Westerberg
2014-09-16 11:52 ` [RFC PATCH v2 16/16] misc: at25: Add ACPI probing support Mika Westerberg
2014-09-21  0:26 ` [RFC PATCH v2 00/16] Add ACPI _DSD and unified device properties support Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-09-24  8:34   ` Lee Jones
2014-09-24  9:45     ` Mika Westerberg
2014-09-22 23:29 ` Bryan Wu
2014-10-01  2:08 ` [PATCH v3 00/15] " Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  2:08   ` [PATCH v3 01/15] ACPI: Add support for device specific properties Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  7:38     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01  2:10   ` [PATCH v3 02/15] Driver core: Unified device properties interface for platform firmware Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  7:47     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01 22:09       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01 23:01         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-02  7:46         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 16:50           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-02  0:03     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2014-10-01  2:10   ` [PATCH v3 03/15] ACPI: Allow drivers to match using Device Tree compatible property Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  7:48     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-03 13:43     ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 17:59       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-04  0:02         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  2:11   ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2014-10-01  7:59     ` [PATCH v3 04/15] ACPI: Document ACPI device specific properties Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 10:41       ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-02 11:51         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 12:15           ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-02 12:46             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 13:36               ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-02 14:29                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02 14:38                   ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-02 14:55                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-03 13:56                       ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 15:02                         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-03 23:58                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-04 10:56                             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-05 21:40                               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-03  2:03                 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-03  8:12                   ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-03 13:58                   ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-03 14:38                     ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-03 14:35                       ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-04  0:13                         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-04 10:59                           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-05 22:26                             ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-03 13:48             ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-04  0:16               ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  2:12   ` [PATCH v3 05/15] gpio / ACPI: Add support for _DSD device properties Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  8:03     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-05 10:36       ` Alexandre Courbot
2014-10-05 21:20         ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  2:14   ` [PATCH v3 06/15] gpio: Support for unified device properties interface Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  2:15   ` [PATCH v3 07/15] gpio: sch: Consolidate core and resume banks Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  2:15   ` [PATCH v3 08/15] leds: leds-gpio: Add support for GPIO descriptors Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  8:05     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01  2:16   ` [PATCH v3 09/15] leds: leds-gpio: Make use of device property API Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-03 14:07     ` Mark Rutland
2014-10-04  0:18       ` Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  2:17   ` [PATCH v3 10/15] leds: leds-gpio: Add ACPI probing support Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  8:13     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01  9:13       ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-01 10:01         ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01 11:59           ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-01 13:52             ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01 14:04               ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-01 14:14                 ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-02  9:55                   ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-02 10:44                     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01 16:30       ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-01 18:11         ` Darren Hart
2014-10-01 18:21           ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-01 18:22           ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01  2:17   ` [PATCH v3 11/15] input: gpio_keys_polled - Add support for GPIO descriptors Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  8:13     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01  2:20   ` [PATCH v3 12/15] input: gpio_keys_polled - Make use of device property API Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  2:20   ` [PATCH v3 13/15] input: gpio_keys_polled - Add ACPI probing support Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  7:48     ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-01  9:15       ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-01 16:28         ` Dmitry Torokhov
2014-10-02  9:53           ` Mika Westerberg
2014-10-01  2:21   ` [PATCH v3 14/15] misc: at25: Make use of device property API Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  8:14     ` Arnd Bergmann
2014-10-01  2:22   ` [PATCH v3 15/15] misc: at25: Add ACPI probing support Rafael J. Wysocki
2014-10-01  8:15     ` Arnd Bergmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5597683.oi0VxOogFu@vostro.rjw.lan \
    --to=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
    --cc=aaron.lu@intel.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=cooloney@gmail.com \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
    --cc=dvhart@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=gnurou@gmail.com \
    --cc=grant.likely@linaro.org \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=lee.jones@linaro.org \
    --cc=linus.walleij@linaro.org \
    --cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).