From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
To: Linux-MM <linux-mm@kvack.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 22/27] mm, vmscan: Only wakeup kswapd once per node for the requested classzone
Date: Tue, 23 Feb 2016 15:19:53 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160223151953.GH2854@techsingularity.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1456239890-20737-1-git-send-email-mgorman@techsingularity.net>
kswapd is woken when zones are below the low watermark but the wakeup
decision is not taking the classzone into account. Now that reclaim is
node-based, it is only required to wake kswapd once per node and only if
all zones are unbalanced for the requested classzone.
Note that one node might be checked multiple times but there is no cheap
way of tracking what nodes have already been visited for zoneslists that
be ordered by either zone or node.
Signed-off-by: Mel Gorman <mgorman@techsingularity.net>
---
mm/vmscan.c | 13 +++++++++++--
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
index 9f1492b077be..e92765eb0a1e 100644
--- a/mm/vmscan.c
+++ b/mm/vmscan.c
@@ -3411,6 +3411,7 @@ static int kswapd(void *p)
void wakeup_kswapd(struct zone *zone, int order, enum zone_type classzone_idx)
{
pg_data_t *pgdat;
+ int z;
if (!populated_zone(zone))
return;
@@ -3424,8 +3425,16 @@ void wakeup_kswapd(struct zone *zone, int order, enum zone_type classzone_idx)
pgdat->kswapd_order = max(pgdat->kswapd_order, order);
if (!waitqueue_active(&pgdat->kswapd_wait))
return;
- if (zone_balanced(zone, order, 0, 0))
- return;
+
+ /* Only wake kswapd if all zones are unbalanced */
+ for (z = 0; z <= zone_idx(zone); z++) {
+ zone = pgdat->node_zones + z;
+ if (!populated_zone(zone))
+ continue;
+
+ if (zone_balanced(zone, order, 0, classzone_idx))
+ return;
+ }
trace_mm_vmscan_wakeup_kswapd(pgdat->node_id, zone_idx(zone), order);
wake_up_interruptible(&pgdat->kswapd_wait);
--
2.6.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-02-23 15:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 56+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-02-23 15:04 [RFC PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v2 Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 01/27] mm, page_alloc: Use ac->classzone_idx instead of zone_idx(preferred_zone) Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 18:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-03-03 10:37 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 02/27] mm, vmscan: Check if cpusets are enabled during direct reclaim Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 18:06 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-03-03 11:31 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-09 11:59 ` Mel Gorman
2016-03-09 12:30 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 03/27] mm, vmstat: Add infrastructure for per-node vmstats Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 18:13 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-24 9:19 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 04/27] mm, vmscan: Move lru_lock to the node Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 18:40 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 05/27] mm, vmscan: Move LRU lists to node Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 18:42 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 06/27] mm, vmscan: Begin reclaiming pages on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 18:57 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 19:03 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-24 10:21 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 07/27] mm, vmscan: Have kswapd only scan based on the highest requested zone Mel Gorman
2016-02-25 22:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 08/27] mm, vmscan: Make kswapd reclaim in terms of nodes Mel Gorman
2016-02-28 16:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-03-03 13:46 ` Vlastimil Babka
2016-03-09 14:45 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 09/27] mm, vmscan: Simplify the logic deciding whether kswapd sleeps Mel Gorman
2016-02-28 16:16 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 10/27] mm, vmscan: By default have direct reclaim only shrink once per node Mel Gorman
2016-02-28 16:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 11/27] mm, vmscan: Clear congestion, dirty and need for compaction on a per-node basis Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 12/27] mm: vmscan: Do not reclaim from kswapd if there is any eligible zone Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 13/27] mm, vmscan: Make shrink_node decisions more node-centric Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 14/27] mm, memcg: Move memcg limit enforcement from zones to nodes Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:04 ` [PATCH 15/27] mm, workingset: Make working set detection node-aware Mel Gorman
2016-02-28 16:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 15:17 ` [PATCH 16/27] mm, page_alloc: Consider dirtyable memory in terms of nodes Mel Gorman
2016-02-28 16:17 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 15:18 ` [PATCH 17/27] mm: Move page mapped accounting to the node Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:18 ` [PATCH 18/27] mm: Rename NR_ANON_PAGES to NR_ANON_MAPPED Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:18 ` [PATCH 19/27] mm: Move most file-based accounting to the node Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:19 ` [PATCH 20/27] mm: Move vmscan writes and file write " Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:19 ` [PATCH 21/27] mm, vmscan: Update classzone_idx if buffer_heads_over_limit Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:19 ` Mel Gorman [this message]
2016-02-23 15:20 ` [PATCH 23/27] mm, vmscan: Account in vmstat for pages skipped during reclaim Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:20 ` [PATCH 24/27] mm: Convert zone_reclaim to node_reclaim Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:20 ` [PATCH 25/27] mm, vmscan: Add classzone information to tracepoints Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:21 ` [PATCH 26/27] mm, page_alloc: Remove fair zone allocation policy Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 15:21 ` [PATCH 27/27] mm: page_alloc: Cache the last node whose dirty limit is reached Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 17:15 ` [RFC PATCH 00/27] Move LRU page reclaim from zones to nodes v2 Christoph Lameter
2016-02-23 20:04 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 20:19 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-23 20:59 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-23 21:58 ` Mel Gorman
2016-02-24 0:12 ` Johannes Weiner
2016-02-24 10:46 ` Mel Gorman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160223151953.GH2854@techsingularity.net \
--to=mgorman@techsingularity.net \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).