linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: zhao ya <marywangran0627@gmail.com>
To: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	Alexey Kuznetsov <kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru>,
	James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>,
	Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org>,
	Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] IPIP tunnel performance improvement
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 12:40:55 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <56D128D7.3090009@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <56D12752.7080303@gmail.com>

From: Zhao Ya <marywangran0627@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Feb 2016 10:06:44 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] IPIP tunnel performance improvement

bypass the logic of each packet's own neighbour creation when using 
pointopint or loopback device.

Recently, in our tests, met a performance problem.
In a large number of packets with different target IP address through 
ipip tunnel, PPS will decrease sharply.

The output of perf top are as follows, __write_lock_failed is of the first:
  - 5.89% [kernel]		[k] __write_lock_failed
   -__write_lock_failed 					a
   -_raw_write_lock_bh						a
   -__neigh_create						a
   -ip_finish_output						a
   -ip_output							a
   -ip_local_out						a

The neighbour subsystem will create a neighbour object for each target 
when using pointopint device. When massive amounts of packets with diff-
erent target IP address to be xmit through a pointopint device, these 
packets will suffer the bottleneck at write_lock_bh(&tbl->lock) after 
creating the neighbour object and then inserting it into a hash-table 
at the same time. 

This patch correct it. Only one or little amounts of neighbour objects 
will be created when massive amounts of packets with different target IP 
address through ipip tunnel. 

As the result, performance will be improved.


Signed-off-by: Zhao Ya <marywangran0627@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Zhaoya <gaiuszhao@tencent.com>
---
 net/ipv4/ip_output.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
index 64878ef..d7c0594 100644
--- a/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/ip_output.c
@@ -202,6 +202,8 @@ static int ip_finish_output2(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *s
 
 	rcu_read_lock_bh();
 	nexthop = (__force u32) rt_nexthop(rt, ip_hdr(skb)->daddr);
+	if (dev->flags & (IFF_LOOPBACK | IFF_POINTOPOINT))
+		nexthop = 0;
 	neigh = __ipv4_neigh_lookup_noref(dev, nexthop);
 	if (unlikely(!neigh))
 		neigh = __neigh_create(&arp_tbl, &nexthop, dev, false);

       reply	other threads:[~2016-02-27  4:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <56D12752.7080303@gmail.com>
2016-02-27  4:40 ` zhao ya [this message]
2016-02-27  4:52   ` [PATCH] IPIP tunnel performance improvement zhao ya
2016-02-27  6:29   ` Cong Wang
2016-02-27  7:06     ` zhao ya

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=56D128D7.3090009@gmail.com \
    --to=marywangran0627@gmail.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=jmorris@namei.org \
    --cc=kaber@trash.net \
    --cc=kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).