[PATCH net-next 1/6] net: skbuff: don't use union for napi_id and sender_cpu

From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, mst@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net-next 1/6] net: skbuff: don't use union for napi_id and sender_cpu
Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2016 13:50:34 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1459403439-6011-2-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459403439-6011-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>

We use a union for napi_id and send_cpu, this is ok for most of the
cases except when we want to support busy polling for tun which needs
napi_id to be stored and passed to socket during tun_net_xmit(). In
this case, napi_id was overridden with sender_cpu before tun_net_xmit()
was called if XPS was enabled. Fixing by not using union for napi_id
and sender_cpu.

Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
 include/linux/skbuff.h | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/skbuff.h b/include/linux/skbuff.h
index 15d0df9..8aee891 100644
--- a/include/linux/skbuff.h
+++ b/include/linux/skbuff.h
@@ -743,11 +743,11 @@ struct sk_buff {
 	__u32			hash;
 	__be16			vlan_proto;
 	__u16			vlan_tci;
-#if defined(CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL) || defined(CONFIG_XPS)
-	union {
-		unsigned int	napi_id;
-		unsigned int	sender_cpu;
-	};
+#if defined(CONFIG_NET_RX_BUSY_POLL)
+	unsigned int		napi_id;
+#endif
+#if defined(CONFIG_XPS)
+	unsigned int		sender_cpu;
 #endif
 	union {
 #ifdef CONFIG_NETWORK_SECMARK
-- 
2.5.0
