linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: davem@davemloft.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>, Xi Wang <xii@google.com>,
	"Michael S . Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH net V2] tuntap: correctly wake up process during uninit
Date: Thu, 19 May 2016 13:36:51 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1463636211-3573-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com> (raw)

We used to check dev->reg_state against NETREG_REGISTERED after each
time we are woke up. But after commit 9e641bdcfa4e ("net-tun:
restructure tun_do_read for better sleep/wakeup efficiency"), it uses
skb_recv_datagram() which does not check dev->reg_state. This will
result if we delete a tun/tap device after a process is blocked in the
reading. The device will wait for the reference count which was held
by that process for ever.

Fixes this by using RCV_SHUTDOWN which will be checked during
sk_recv_datagram() before trying to wake up the process during uninit.

Fixes: 9e641bdcfa4e ("net-tun: restructure tun_do_read for better
sleep/wakeup efficiency")
Cc: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: Xi Wang <xii@google.com>
Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
---
- The patch is needed for -stable.
- Changes from v1: remove unnecessary NETREG_REGISTERED check in tun_do_read()
---
 drivers/net/tun.c | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
index 425e983..e16487c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/tun.c
+++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
@@ -580,11 +580,13 @@ static void tun_detach_all(struct net_device *dev)
 	for (i = 0; i < n; i++) {
 		tfile = rtnl_dereference(tun->tfiles[i]);
 		BUG_ON(!tfile);
+		tfile->socket.sk->sk_shutdown = RCV_SHUTDOWN;
 		tfile->socket.sk->sk_data_ready(tfile->socket.sk);
 		RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
 		--tun->numqueues;
 	}
 	list_for_each_entry(tfile, &tun->disabled, next) {
+		tfile->socket.sk->sk_shutdown = RCV_SHUTDOWN;
 		tfile->socket.sk->sk_data_ready(tfile->socket.sk);
 		RCU_INIT_POINTER(tfile->tun, NULL);
 	}
@@ -641,6 +643,7 @@ static int tun_attach(struct tun_struct *tun, struct file *file, bool skip_filte
 			goto out;
 	}
 	tfile->queue_index = tun->numqueues;
+	tfile->socket.sk->sk_shutdown &= ~RCV_SHUTDOWN;
 	rcu_assign_pointer(tfile->tun, tun);
 	rcu_assign_pointer(tun->tfiles[tun->numqueues], tfile);
 	tun->numqueues++;
@@ -1491,9 +1494,6 @@ static ssize_t tun_do_read(struct tun_struct *tun, struct tun_file *tfile,
 	if (!iov_iter_count(to))
 		return 0;
 
-	if (tun->dev->reg_state != NETREG_REGISTERED)
-		return -EIO;
-
 	/* Read frames from queue */
 	skb = __skb_recv_datagram(tfile->socket.sk, noblock ? MSG_DONTWAIT : 0,
 				  &peeked, &off, &err);
-- 
2.7.4

             reply	other threads:[~2016-05-19  5:36 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-05-19  5:36 Jason Wang [this message]
2016-05-19 11:25 ` [PATCH net V2] tuntap: correctly wake up process during uninit Eric Dumazet
2016-05-19 11:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2016-05-20 23:38 ` David Miller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1463636211-3573-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com \
    --to=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=xii@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).